FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4310713030> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4310713030 endingPage "1693" @default.
• W4310713030 startingPage "1693" @default.
• W4310713030 abstract "From the Editor-In-Chief Health AffairsVol. 41, No. 12: Equitable Social Supports & More Equitable Social Supports And MoreAlan R. WeilPUBLISHED:December 2022Free Accesshttps://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01480AboutSectionsView PDFPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsDownload Exhibits TOPICSHealth equitySocial determinants of healthAccess to careHospital performancePaymentLow incomeThe December 2022 issue of Health Affairs includes research funded through the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s Equity-Focused Policy Research program. In an introductory analysis, Daniel Finkelstein and colleagues describe the relationship between income and health. Although various government programs provide a financial safety net, the authors point out that “there is inequitable access to these programs, which can exacerbate health disparities.”Equitable Social SupportsThe Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) is associated with improved health outcomes, but about one in five eligible families do not receive the benefit. In interviews with EITC-eligible Californians, Rita Hamad and coauthors find gaps in awareness of the program, confusion about complex eligibility requirements, and language barriers to obtaining needed information.Dana Thomson and coauthors examine EITC receipt among eligible Hispanic families. They find “lower odds of EITC receipt among income-eligible families with a self-employed parent, families with a parent who had lower English language proficiency, and families living with relatives.”Enrollees in Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) face sanctions if they do not comply with various program requirements. Quantitative analysis of Illinois data conducted by Kathryn Kaplan and coauthors shows that “Black and multiracial families enrolled in TANF were more likely to be sanctioned compared with families of other races.” Qualitative interviews highlight the role of child support cooperation requirements, which the authors refer to as “an outdated and institutionally racist operating model that takes away money from families that are already struggling to achieve economic stability.”Donna Ginther and Michelle Johnson-Motoyama examine the association between state TANF policies and child welfare. As economic resources are correlated with child maltreatment, the authors find that state TANF policies that restrict access to benefits yield “statistically significant increases in neglect victims, total foster care placements, and foster care placements for reasons of neglect.”Policy makers worry that benefits “cliffs,” where a small increase in income can reduce or eliminate eligibility, serve as disincentives to work or advancement. In interviews with low-income parents in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Kess Ballentine and coauthors find little evidence of this response. Rather, they report, “In the context of a limited social welfare system and a labor market rife with jobs with low pay, meager fringe benefits, and little flexibility, parents focused on securing the right balance of resources, including money, time, energy, and in-kind resources, to promote family well-being.”Community HealthIn a Policy Insight, Anthony Iton and coauthors argue that population health interventions intended to promote equity and reduce disparities must shift from a “technocratic” approach with a “focus on individuals’ behaviors, genes, or access to health care” to one based on communities exercising power. The work of health equity, the authors state, “requires enhancing the quality of democracy to change the status quo power balance in communities throughout the US.”Stephen Trinidad and coauthors analyze fifteen indices of area-based socioeconomic deprivation, identified through a systematic scoping review, and find variation in the data used to define deprivation, the geographic boundaries used to define each area, and whether or not the indices rank areas.Access To CareThe Colorado Family Planning Initiative expanded access to contraceptives in 2009 by allowing all clients of Title X clinics to choose any contraceptive method approved by the Food and Drug Administration at low or no cost to the client. Sara Yeatman and coauthors find that the initiative led to a 6–12 percent increase in on-time college completion among women.Drawing upon Germany’s reference pricing for anti-inflammatory biosimilars, James Robinson explains that it is “administratively feasible, clinically acceptable to patients, and financially beneficial to purchasers” to group biologics and biosimilars into a single category for payment, as advocated by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.Using national data from the period 2011–15, Paula Chatterjee and coauthors find that up to 31.6 percent of Medicaid disproportionate share hospital payments, which subsidize hospitals serving low-income patients and providing uncompensated care, have gone to hospitals that “demonstrated low orientation toward caring for low-income populations.”AcknowledgmentsHealth Affairs thanks the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation for its financial support of the equitable social supports articles. As the year comes to a close, I express my deep gratitude to Sarah Kolk and Ndidi Anekwe for preparing excellent drafts of the article summaries that appear in each month’s From The Editor-In-Chief. Loading Comments... Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. DetailsExhibitsReferencesRelated Article Metrics History Published online 5 December 2022 Information© 2022 Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.PDF download" @default.
• W4310713030 created "2022-12-16" @default.
• W4310713030 creator A5030004017 @default.
• W4310713030 date "2022-12-01" @default.
• W4310713030 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W4310713030 title "Equitable Social Supports And More" @default.
• W4310713030 doi "https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01480" @default.
• W4310713030 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36469815" @default.
• W4310713030 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4310713030 type Work @default.
• W4310713030 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4310713030 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4310713030 hasAuthorship W4310713030A5030004017 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C100243477 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C143095724 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C19159745 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C199728807 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C2250968 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C2777281377 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C2778069335 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C2778216598 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C2778979077 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C78491826 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C100243477 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C121955636 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C126322002 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C138885662 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C143095724 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C144024400 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C144133560 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C151956035 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C160735492 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C17744445 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C19159745 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C199539241 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C199728807 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C2250968 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C2777281377 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C2778069335 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C2778137410 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C2778216598 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C2778979077 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C41895202 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C71924100 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C78491826 @default.
• W4310713030 hasConceptScore W4310713030C99454951 @default.
• W4310713030 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W4310713030 hasLocation W43107130301 @default.
• W4310713030 hasLocation W43107130302 @default.
• W4310713030 hasOpenAccess W4310713030 @default.
• W4310713030 hasPrimaryLocation W43107130301 @default.
• W4310713030 hasRelatedWork W1482697141 @default.
• W4310713030 hasRelatedWork W1850034482 @default.
• W4310713030 hasRelatedWork W2028686211 @default.
• W4310713030 hasRelatedWork W2149250530 @default.
• W4310713030 hasRelatedWork W2150516580 @default.
• W4310713030 hasRelatedWork W2313467026 @default.
• W4310713030 hasRelatedWork W2953254557 @default.
• W4310713030 hasRelatedWork W3123201288 @default.
• W4310713030 hasRelatedWork W4205622970 @default.
• W4310713030 hasRelatedWork W4314445984 @default.
• W4310713030 hasVolume "41" @default.
• W4310713030 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4310713030 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4310713030 workType "article" @default.