FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4310785113> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4310785113 endingPage "775" @default.
• W4310785113 startingPage "727" @default.
• W4310785113 abstract "Abstract Objective Misoprostol is a synthetic PGE 1 analogue that is used for induction of labour. Current guidelines support the use of doses that do not exceed 25 mcg in order to limit maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. The present meta-analysis investigates the efficacy and safety of oral compared to vaginally inserted misoprostol in terms of induction of labor and adverse peripartum outcomes. Methods We searched Medline, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases from inception till April 2022. Randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of oral misoprostol (per os or sublingual) compared to vaginally inserted misoprostol. Effect sizes were calculated in R. Sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the possibility of small study effects, p-hacking. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis according to the dose of misoprostol was also investigated. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by two independent reviewers using the risk of bias 2 tool. Quality of evidence for primary outcomes was evaluated under the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework, ranging from very low to high. Results Overall, 57 studies were included that involved 10,975 parturient. Their risk of bias ranged between low-moderate. There were no differences among the routes of intake in terms of successful vaginal delivery within 24 h (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80) and cesarean section rates (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.82, 1.04). Sublingual misoprostol was superior compared to vaginal misoprostol in reducing the interval from induction to delivery (MD – 1.11 h, 95% CI – 2.06, – 0.17). On the other hand, per os misoprostol was inferior compared to vaginal misoprostol in terms of this outcome (MD 3.45 h, 95% CI 1.85, 5.06). Maternal and neonatal morbidity was not affected by the route or dose of misoprostol. Conclusion The findings of our study suggest that oral misoprostol intake is equally safe to vaginal misoprostol in terms of inducing labor at term. Sublingual intake seems to outperform the per os and vaginal routes without increasing the accompanying morbidity. Increasing the dose of misoprostol does not seem to increase its efficacy. Clinical trial registration Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/V9JHF )." @default.
• W4310785113 created "2022-12-17" @default.
• W4310785113 creator A5007685644 @default.
• W4310785113 creator A5009527248 @default.
• W4310785113 creator A5024830759 @default.
• W4310785113 creator A5045678083 @default.
• W4310785113 creator A5058146592 @default.
• W4310785113 creator A5071230258 @default.
• W4310785113 creator A5080058466 @default.
• W4310785113 creator A5084571691 @default.
• W4310785113 date "2022-12-06" @default.
• W4310785113 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4310785113 title "Efficacy and safety of oral and sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis" @default.
• W4310785113 cites W1534184002 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W1597086675 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W1813946213 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W1965003706 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W1975764315 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W1979140796 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W1982614325 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2009522523 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2017034446 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2019468372 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2019658701 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2020370551 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2021909765 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2024390650 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2032506622 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2042980323 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2051530934 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2062799778 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2063411450 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2068964852 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2070623371 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2074116747 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2091649072 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2096066196 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2099999129 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2102403128 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2109887283 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2111544860 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2112192051 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2113529708 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2114990739 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2122478732 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2122607168 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2123449208 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2125990157 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2126199667 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2129545694 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2131304366 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2147376243 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2152953196 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2165742357 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2170892587 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2171655926 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2186096243 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2271136853 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2409440760 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2428945929 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2513883627 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2576440140 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2588681363 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2608835782 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2767674602 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2790583192 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2803688724 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2914336236 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2936141566 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2943425904 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2951824850 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W2999166887 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W3023764263 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W3031781212 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W3072749419 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W3122080946 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W3149221756 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W4210365127 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W4242033181 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W4244019708 @default.
• W4310785113 cites W4293043650 @default.
• W4310785113 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06867-9" @default.
• W4310785113 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36472645" @default.
• W4310785113 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4310785113 type Work @default.
• W4310785113 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4310785113 countsByYear W43107851132023 @default.
• W4310785113 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4310785113 hasAuthorship W4310785113A5007685644 @default.
• W4310785113 hasAuthorship W4310785113A5009527248 @default.
• W4310785113 hasAuthorship W4310785113A5024830759 @default.
• W4310785113 hasAuthorship W4310785113A5045678083 @default.
• W4310785113 hasAuthorship W4310785113A5058146592 @default.
• W4310785113 hasAuthorship W4310785113A5071230258 @default.
• W4310785113 hasAuthorship W4310785113A5080058466 @default.
• W4310785113 hasAuthorship W4310785113A5084571691 @default.
• W4310785113 hasBestOaLocation W43107851131 @default.
• W4310785113 hasConcept C126322002 @default.

• next