FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4311012012> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4311012012 abstract "Background In modern dentistry, fixed dental prostheses are often the preferred and the most complex treatment procedures. However, the success of these procedures depends to a great extent on the durability and consistency of the ongoing reconstruction. This paper aimed to compare the shear bond characteristics of conventional glass ionomer cement types, namely, Vivaglass luting cement and GC fuji 1 cement, after being subjected to two different dentin-cleaning techniques: the tungsten carbide bur and the prophy jet. This would help determine whether the castings that have been cleaned and recemented are just as tenacious as when they were initially placed. Methodology A total of 60 human teeth extracted due to periodontal disease were collected for this study. The teeth were cleaned and stored in a thymol arrangement after carefully removing any leftover fragile tissue. They were randomly grouped as follows: luted with Vivaglass cement (N = 30) in group A and GC fuji 1 cement (N = 30) in group B. Each group's debonded surfaces were arbitrarily split into three subgroups, with each containing 10 samples. This was done to comply with dentin-cleaning techniques for recementation. Results The intergroup bond strengths calculated were compared among the subgroups. The mean strength for subgroup IA was 2.78 ± 0.24 MPa, subgroup IB was 2.60 ± 0.30 MPa, subgroup IIA was 4.39 ± 0.19 MPa, subgroup IIB was 3.80 ± 0.23 MPa, subgroup III A was 4.52 ± 0.22 MPa, and subgroup IIIB was 3.63 ± 0.17 MPa. An analysis of variance test showed there was a significant difference between the subgroups (F = 117.60; P = 0.001). The results revealed that there was a significant difference between the subgroups. Shear bond strength testing was performed using common testing equipment. The results indicated that there was not any significant difference between the mean increases in the shear bond strength of the two luting cement types. However, the GC fuji 1 cement showed greater initial shear bond strength than the Vivaglass cement. Additionally, when the tungsten carbide bur was used as a cleaning technique before recementing, it showed greater shear bond strength compared to the prophy jet. Conclusions The initial shear bond strength of GC fuji 1 (Group B) luting cement was slightly higher than that of Vivaglass (Group A), and the bond strength achieved after recementation with GC fuji 1 and surface cleaning with the carbide bur was the highest among the other three groups." @default.
• W4311012012 created "2022-12-22" @default.
• W4311012012 creator A5028429892 @default.
• W4311012012 creator A5037704313 @default.
• W4311012012 creator A5041036997 @default.
• W4311012012 creator A5055522778 @default.
• W4311012012 creator A5064561207 @default.
• W4311012012 creator A5077256518 @default.
• W4311012012 date "2022-11-30" @default.
• W4311012012 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4311012012 title "Evaluation and Comparison of Two Different Cleaning Procedures on Mechanical Properties for Recemented Restoration Using Two Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement Types: An In Vitro Study" @default.
• W4311012012 cites W122932297 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W1965040877 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W1989301135 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W1997933708 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W2000336658 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W2004169637 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W2006753039 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W2011701678 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W2031711305 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W2043149829 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W2067120911 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W2075872836 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W2077813527 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W2082885562 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W2105648061 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W2124315293 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W2130672415 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W2395415211 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W2606066313 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W2800455453 @default.
• W4311012012 cites W4322574886 @default.
• W4311012012 doi "https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32044" @default.
• W4311012012 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36600847" @default.
• W4311012012 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4311012012 type Work @default.
• W4311012012 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4311012012 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4311012012 hasAuthorship W4311012012A5028429892 @default.
• W4311012012 hasAuthorship W4311012012A5037704313 @default.
• W4311012012 hasAuthorship W4311012012A5041036997 @default.
• W4311012012 hasAuthorship W4311012012A5055522778 @default.
• W4311012012 hasAuthorship W4311012012A5064561207 @default.
• W4311012012 hasAuthorship W4311012012A5077256518 @default.
• W4311012012 hasBestOaLocation W43110120121 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConcept C112950240 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConcept C159096172 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConcept C180478085 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConcept C2776189445 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConcept C2778400979 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConcept C2779263046 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConcept C51936186 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConcept C523993062 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConcept C68928338 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConceptScore W4311012012C112950240 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConceptScore W4311012012C159096172 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConceptScore W4311012012C159985019 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConceptScore W4311012012C180478085 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConceptScore W4311012012C192562407 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConceptScore W4311012012C199343813 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConceptScore W4311012012C2776189445 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConceptScore W4311012012C2778400979 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConceptScore W4311012012C2779227376 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConceptScore W4311012012C2779263046 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConceptScore W4311012012C29694066 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConceptScore W4311012012C51936186 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConceptScore W4311012012C523993062 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConceptScore W4311012012C68928338 @default.
• W4311012012 hasConceptScore W4311012012C71924100 @default.
• W4311012012 hasLocation W43110120121 @default.
• W4311012012 hasLocation W43110120122 @default.
• W4311012012 hasLocation W43110120123 @default.
• W4311012012 hasOpenAccess W4311012012 @default.
• W4311012012 hasPrimaryLocation W43110120121 @default.
• W4311012012 hasRelatedWork W1972548992 @default.
• W4311012012 hasRelatedWork W1998064659 @default.
• W4311012012 hasRelatedWork W2000632561 @default.
• W4311012012 hasRelatedWork W2087581278 @default.
• W4311012012 hasRelatedWork W2246533723 @default.
• W4311012012 hasRelatedWork W2405726240 @default.
• W4311012012 hasRelatedWork W2414241153 @default.
• W4311012012 hasRelatedWork W3036369587 @default.
• W4311012012 hasRelatedWork W4293053496 @default.
• W4311012012 hasRelatedWork W4313396551 @default.
• W4311012012 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4311012012 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4311012012 workType "article" @default.