FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4311178143> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4311178143 abstract "<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Serious games can affect motivation and learning. However, little is known about users’ experiences through the process from design and development to implementation and evaluation of a serious game application. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> The aim of this study was to document how user insights can inform the concept and development of a serious game application in critical thinking, in addition to gather user experiences with the game application. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> This was a mixed-methods study in four successive phases with both qualitative and quantitative data collected in the period from 2020 to 2022. Qualitative data on design and development was obtained from four focus group (FG) discussions, and qualitative evaluation data was obtained from one FG interview and three open-ended questions in the game application. The quantitative data originates from user statistics. The qualitative data were analyzed thematically, and user data were analyzed using non-parametric tests. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> The first FG discussion revealed that the students’ (3 participants) assessment of whether a claim was reliable or not was limited to performing Google searches, when faced with an ad for a health intervention. Based on the acquired knowledge of the target group, the game’s prerequisites, and the technical possibilities, a pilot of the game was created, and reviewed question by question in three separate FG discussions (6 participants). After adjustments, the game was advertised at OsloMet, and 193 students tested the game. A correlation (r =0.77, P <.001) was found between number of replays and total points achieved in the game. There was no demonstrable difference (P=.073) between the total scores of students from different faculties. Seventy (36.3 %) students answered the evaluation questions in the game. They used words like “fun” and “educational” about the experiences with the game, and words like “motivating” and “engaging” related to the learning experience. The design was described as “varied” and “user-friendly”. Suggested improvements included adding references, more games and modules, more difficult questions, and an introductory text explaining the game. The results from the evaluation FG interview (4 participants) corresponded to a large extent with the results in the open-ended questions in the game. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Users can be successfully involved in all stages of the development and evaluation of a serious game that aims to engage students to think critically about health claims. Our approach can inform how such games can be designed and implemented in the development of other serious games where critical thinking about claims is important. </sec>" @default.
• W4311178143 created "2022-12-24" @default.
• W4311178143 creator A5015910858 @default.
• W4311178143 creator A5037313100 @default.
• W4311178143 creator A5045952400 @default.
• W4311178143 creator A5072115105 @default.
• W4311178143 date "2022-12-06" @default.
• W4311178143 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W4311178143 title "Development and evaluation of a serious game application to engage university students in critical thinking: a mixed-method study (Preprint)" @default.
• W4311178143 cites W1502678715 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W1508746731 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W1996240400 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2079175517 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2099460238 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2105099865 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2138076879 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2305278139 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2327798842 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2563677521 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2566186462 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2570680039 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2570796533 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2610287240 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2791702008 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2805549342 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2914415312 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2942420756 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2961080076 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2971179158 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W2982024954 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W3011856041 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W3016249157 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W3095307364 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W3175925925 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W3191036075 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W4234593178 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W4247061611 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W4254904072 @default.
• W4311178143 cites W897620132 @default.
• W4311178143 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.44831" @default.
• W4311178143 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4311178143 type Work @default.
• W4311178143 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4311178143 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4311178143 hasAuthorship W4311178143A5015910858 @default.
• W4311178143 hasAuthorship W4311178143A5037313100 @default.
• W4311178143 hasAuthorship W4311178143A5045952400 @default.
• W4311178143 hasAuthorship W4311178143A5072115105 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConcept C43169469 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConcept C49774154 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConcept C503285160 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConcept C87156501 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConceptScore W4311178143C111919701 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConceptScore W4311178143C119857082 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConceptScore W4311178143C136764020 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConceptScore W4311178143C144024400 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConceptScore W4311178143C145420912 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConceptScore W4311178143C15744967 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConceptScore W4311178143C190248442 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConceptScore W4311178143C19165224 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConceptScore W4311178143C36289849 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConceptScore W4311178143C41008148 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConceptScore W4311178143C43169469 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConceptScore W4311178143C49774154 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConceptScore W4311178143C503285160 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConceptScore W4311178143C56995899 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConceptScore W4311178143C87156501 @default.
• W4311178143 hasConceptScore W4311178143C98045186 @default.
• W4311178143 hasLocation W43111781431 @default.
• W4311178143 hasOpenAccess W4311178143 @default.
• W4311178143 hasPrimaryLocation W43111781431 @default.
• W4311178143 hasRelatedWork W1774155268 @default.
• W4311178143 hasRelatedWork W2099008892 @default.
• W4311178143 hasRelatedWork W2242527596 @default.
• W4311178143 hasRelatedWork W2470183586 @default.
• W4311178143 hasRelatedWork W2783812639 @default.
• W4311178143 hasRelatedWork W2883679753 @default.
• W4311178143 hasRelatedWork W2909083461 @default.
• W4311178143 hasRelatedWork W2932429820 @default.
• W4311178143 hasRelatedWork W2997034443 @default.
• W4311178143 hasRelatedWork W4206194399 @default.
• W4311178143 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4311178143 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4311178143 workType "article" @default.