FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4311499701> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4311499701 endingPage "116896" @default.
• W4311499701 startingPage "116896" @default.
• W4311499701 abstract "Biological control (BC) of invasive alien plants (IAP) can be an effective environmental management approach. It has only very recently been adopted in Europe and is underutilized compared to other continents where this method has been successfully implemented for over a century. This is in sharp contrast to the BC of invertebrate pests, which has been taken up widely within Europe. It has been suggested that this is related to the risk-adverse attitude of Europeans towards weed BC. Scientific and public perception have a major influence on environmental policy actions. Public perception and knowledge regarding BC is an understudied subject despite its relevance for the application of this management alternative. We aimed to assess the knowledge and perception of BC of IAP among European professionals compared with their peers from other continents. To this end we conducted an online survey including multiple choice and open questions among over 700 people professionally engaged with managing the natural environment, of which approximately half were from Europe (EU) and the others from outside (non-EU). We assessed relationships between the geographical location of the respondents and their knowledge, and perceptions of BC of weeds versus BC of invertebrate pests. We found that respondents' location influenced both perceptions and knowledge of BC for weeds. Compared to non-EU respondents, EU professionals showed less appreciation for BC (e.g., regarding safety, sustainability, and cost-effectiveness), and perceived it as a riskier method, particularly in the case of practitioners and researchers. More profoundly insect pest BC tended to be considered less safe than weed BC for non-EU respondents. Confidence in weed BC as a method, as well as in the validity of the associated pre-release risk assessments, strongly increased with the level of expertise in weed BC. While a much higher proportion of non-EU respondents were correctly aware of the presence/absence of BC in their own countries and identified successful examples of BC accurately, both groups of respondents were similarly aware of unsuccessful BC examples, including BC agents against animals, stressing the bias of EU respondents towards examples of BC failure. The appreciation of weed BC in Europe could be elevated by a combination of increasing knowledge of the technique and pre-release risk assessment and promoting successful examples of weed BC, which may bring major benefits for the management of IAP across the region." @default.
• W4311499701 created "2022-12-26" @default.
• W4311499701 creator A5031044561 @default.
• W4311499701 creator A5036940270 @default.
• W4311499701 creator A5051808960 @default.
• W4311499701 creator A5059540928 @default.
• W4311499701 creator A5064653724 @default.
• W4311499701 date "2023-02-01" @default.
• W4311499701 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W4311499701 title "Knowledge and perceptions of invasive plant biocontrol in Europe versus the rest of the world" @default.
• W4311499701 cites W1981879749 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W1989667138 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2045306190 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2053609378 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2058851661 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2073781719 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2081482888 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2104139302 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2116767319 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2118628325 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2151689935 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2296215753 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2496254742 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2606228880 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2739547366 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2765572013 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2779190931 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2792336322 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2793860071 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2802473481 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2805837315 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2885722172 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2895847515 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W2980819838 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W3014436138 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W3144689495 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W3152637304 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W3206775418 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W4210431172 @default.
• W4311499701 cites W4221072716 @default.
• W4311499701 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116896" @default.
• W4311499701 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36470190" @default.
• W4311499701 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4311499701 type Work @default.
• W4311499701 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4311499701 countsByYear W43114997012023 @default.
• W4311499701 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4311499701 hasAuthorship W4311499701A5031044561 @default.
• W4311499701 hasAuthorship W4311499701A5036940270 @default.
• W4311499701 hasAuthorship W4311499701A5051808960 @default.
• W4311499701 hasAuthorship W4311499701A5059540928 @default.
• W4311499701 hasAuthorship W4311499701A5064653724 @default.
• W4311499701 hasBestOaLocation W43114997011 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConcept C123963621 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConcept C136020623 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConcept C163355716 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConcept C45355965 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConcept C66204764 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConcept C91375879 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConceptScore W4311499701C107826830 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConceptScore W4311499701C123963621 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConceptScore W4311499701C136020623 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConceptScore W4311499701C144024400 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConceptScore W4311499701C15744967 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConceptScore W4311499701C163355716 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConceptScore W4311499701C169760540 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConceptScore W4311499701C18903297 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConceptScore W4311499701C205649164 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConceptScore W4311499701C26760741 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConceptScore W4311499701C39432304 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConceptScore W4311499701C45355965 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConceptScore W4311499701C66204764 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConceptScore W4311499701C86803240 @default.
• W4311499701 hasConceptScore W4311499701C91375879 @default.
• W4311499701 hasFunder F4320315701 @default.
• W4311499701 hasFunder F4320322736 @default.
• W4311499701 hasFunder F4320323642 @default.
• W4311499701 hasFunder F4320332770 @default.
• W4311499701 hasFunder F4320334595 @default.
• W4311499701 hasFunder F4320334709 @default.
• W4311499701 hasFunder F4320334779 @default.
• W4311499701 hasFunder F4320335254 @default.
• W4311499701 hasFunder F4320338337 @default.
• W4311499701 hasLocation W43114997011 @default.
• W4311499701 hasLocation W43114997012 @default.
• W4311499701 hasLocation W43114997013 @default.
• W4311499701 hasOpenAccess W4311499701 @default.
• W4311499701 hasPrimaryLocation W43114997011 @default.
• W4311499701 hasRelatedWork W1546896275 @default.

• next