FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4311596069> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4311596069 endingPage "115356" @default.
• W4311596069 startingPage "115356" @default.
• W4311596069 abstract "For assessment and design of post installed reinforcing bar (rebar) anchorages in reinforced concrete (RC) construction, two different approaches (i) conventional RC approach and (ii) fastening technology approach, coexist. For high strength adhesive systems, it is likely that the design anchorage lengths obtained using the fastening technology approach are significantly smaller in comparison to that obtained using the conventional RC approach. The main reason for this gap between the two approaches is, that while conventional RC approach considers qualified post installed (PI) systems as equivalent to cast in straight systems (CIS), PI systems are considered to be system specific in fastening technology. The system specific consideration of PI rebar anchorages in fastening technology makes it possible to take advantage of the higher bond strengths of the innovative adhesive systems, which is not possible in conventional RC design. This paper considers a comparison of the available approaches for assessment of rebar end anchorages in RC column foundation joints (CFJ). To this end, the benchmark test data generated by the authors [1] is used for the comparative discussions in the background of possible modes of failure. To include system specific definition of bond resistance in conventional RC approach, the potential of the system specific bond model in fastening technology to replace the general bond model in conventional RC practice for rebar anchorages is discussed. The alternate possibility of evolving the existing bond model in RC practice for including system specific consideration is also discussed. It is observed that the system specific definition of bond resistance within the framework of RC design practice is more suitable for rebar end anchorages. A proposal for failure hierarchy based assessment approach employing this system specific definition is made in this paper. The proposed approach is successfully validated to demonstrate its capability to assess both the failure loads and failure modes in a realistic manner, irrespective of the type of anchorage (cast in or post installed). The proposed approach is in concurrence with RC design practice and at the same time does not conflict with fastening technology. The presented is thus, a comprehensive breakthrough towards harmonizing the coexisting design concepts for rebar end anchorages." @default.
• W4311596069 created "2022-12-27" @default.
• W4311596069 creator A5025773676 @default.
• W4311596069 creator A5042208216 @default.
• W4311596069 creator A5046623160 @default.
• W4311596069 date "2023-02-01" @default.
• W4311596069 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4311596069 title "Cast-in and post-installed rebar anchorage systems in RC column foundation joints: System specific assessment and design" @default.
• W4311596069 cites W2298027384 @default.
• W4311596069 cites W2992416818 @default.
• W4311596069 cites W824359354 @default.
• W4311596069 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115356" @default.
• W4311596069 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4311596069 type Work @default.
• W4311596069 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4311596069 countsByYear W43115960692023 @default.
• W4311596069 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4311596069 hasAuthorship W4311596069A5025773676 @default.
• W4311596069 hasAuthorship W4311596069A5042208216 @default.
• W4311596069 hasAuthorship W4311596069A5046623160 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConcept C13280743 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConcept C13355873 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConcept C153294291 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConcept C185798385 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConcept C188721877 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConcept C2778664469 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConcept C2780551164 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConcept C2780966255 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConcept C2988805333 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConceptScore W4311596069C121332964 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConceptScore W4311596069C127413603 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConceptScore W4311596069C13280743 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConceptScore W4311596069C13355873 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConceptScore W4311596069C153294291 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConceptScore W4311596069C166957645 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConceptScore W4311596069C185798385 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConceptScore W4311596069C188721877 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConceptScore W4311596069C205649164 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConceptScore W4311596069C2778664469 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConceptScore W4311596069C2780551164 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConceptScore W4311596069C2780966255 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConceptScore W4311596069C2988805333 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConceptScore W4311596069C66938386 @default.
• W4311596069 hasConceptScore W4311596069C95457728 @default.
• W4311596069 hasLocation W43115960691 @default.
• W4311596069 hasOpenAccess W4311596069 @default.
• W4311596069 hasPrimaryLocation W43115960691 @default.
• W4311596069 hasRelatedWork W1974490852 @default.
• W4311596069 hasRelatedWork W2358821173 @default.
• W4311596069 hasRelatedWork W2362902511 @default.
• W4311596069 hasRelatedWork W2364307650 @default.
• W4311596069 hasRelatedWork W2381911573 @default.
• W4311596069 hasRelatedWork W2583766079 @default.
• W4311596069 hasRelatedWork W2914003376 @default.
• W4311596069 hasRelatedWork W2977651226 @default.
• W4311596069 hasRelatedWork W4313392706 @default.
• W4311596069 hasRelatedWork W584428121 @default.
• W4311596069 hasVolume "276" @default.
• W4311596069 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4311596069 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4311596069 workType "article" @default.