Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4311733645> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 81 of
81
with 100 items per page.
- W4311733645 abstract "Abstract Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), is the treatment of choice for most patients with aortic stenosis. Transfemoral access remains the most widely used peripheral vascular approach for TAVR and dedicated plug-based or suture-based vascular closure devices are available to achieve femoral hemostasis. However, the comparative safety of such strategies is controversial in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR. Objectives in this study, we aimed to evaluate the rates of vascular access complications according to the use of plug-based or suture-based vascular closure in patients undergoing TAVR. Methods Data were retrospectively collected from two high-volume TAVR centers from September 2009 to March 2022. Patients were categorized according to the use of plug-based or suture-based vascular closure devices. The plug-based platform used was MANTA (Teleflex), while the suture-based devices were the Perclose ProGlide™ or the Prostar™ Systems (Abbott Vascular). Baseline demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic variables were compared between these groups using an independent-sample Student's t-test for continuous variables, presented as mean±SD, and the chi-square test for categorical or binary variables, presented as number and percentage, as appropriate. The odds ratio (OR) for vascular complications was calculated using a multivariate logistic regression model including as dependent variables all relevant baseline and procedural characteristics. The closure device variable was included in the multivariate model using the Prostar™ XL device group as reference. Vascular complications were adjudicated according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium definitions 3. Results Out of 874 patients, hemostasis was achieved with Prostar™ XL PVS in 120 (13.7%) patients, with Perclose ProGlide™ in 525 (60.1%), and with MANTA 229 (26.2%). No differences in age and common cardiovascular risk factors were observed between the group except for the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (30.6% vs. 17.0%, p<0.0001) and dyslipidemia (58.9% vs. 68.6%, p=0.01) as well as for the echo and procedural variables except for the Euroscore II that was lower in the plug-based group (6.0±5.6 vs. 5.1±4.68), and for the higher use of new generation devices (79.1% vs. 98.3%, p<0.0001). After adjustment for common cardiovascular risk factors and procedural features, no differences were observed for total vascular complications [OR: 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33 to 1.38) and OR: 0.60 (95% CI: 0.33 to 1.53), for Perclose ProGlide™ and MANTA groups, respectively]. Likewise, no substantial differences were observed for major and minor vascular complications. Conclusions Both suture-based and plug-based devices have comparable outcomes with regard to the risk of vascular complications. Further randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm this observation in high-risk sub-group patients with for example heavily calcified access or obesity." @default.
- W4311733645 created "2022-12-28" @default.
- W4311733645 creator A5000230285 @default.
- W4311733645 creator A5002280234 @default.
- W4311733645 creator A5006978796 @default.
- W4311733645 creator A5013988324 @default.
- W4311733645 creator A5023645594 @default.
- W4311733645 creator A5028411489 @default.
- W4311733645 creator A5041591497 @default.
- W4311733645 creator A5043663840 @default.
- W4311733645 creator A5058853361 @default.
- W4311733645 creator A5061115044 @default.
- W4311733645 creator A5064150868 @default.
- W4311733645 creator A5068281952 @default.
- W4311733645 creator A5068962221 @default.
- W4311733645 creator A5075595766 @default.
- W4311733645 creator A5088557482 @default.
- W4311733645 date "2022-12-14" @default.
- W4311733645 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W4311733645 title "1019 SAFETY OF PLUG-BASED AND SUTURE-BASED VASCULAR CLOSURE DEVICES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT: A MULTICENTER OBSERVATIONAL STUDY" @default.
- W4311733645 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suac121.356" @default.
- W4311733645 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4311733645 type Work @default.
- W4311733645 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4311733645 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4311733645 hasAuthorship W4311733645A5000230285 @default.
- W4311733645 hasAuthorship W4311733645A5002280234 @default.
- W4311733645 hasAuthorship W4311733645A5006978796 @default.
- W4311733645 hasAuthorship W4311733645A5013988324 @default.
- W4311733645 hasAuthorship W4311733645A5023645594 @default.
- W4311733645 hasAuthorship W4311733645A5028411489 @default.
- W4311733645 hasAuthorship W4311733645A5041591497 @default.
- W4311733645 hasAuthorship W4311733645A5043663840 @default.
- W4311733645 hasAuthorship W4311733645A5058853361 @default.
- W4311733645 hasAuthorship W4311733645A5061115044 @default.
- W4311733645 hasAuthorship W4311733645A5064150868 @default.
- W4311733645 hasAuthorship W4311733645A5068281952 @default.
- W4311733645 hasAuthorship W4311733645A5068962221 @default.
- W4311733645 hasAuthorship W4311733645A5075595766 @default.
- W4311733645 hasAuthorship W4311733645A5088557482 @default.
- W4311733645 hasBestOaLocation W43117336451 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConcept C2778589496 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConcept C2779495589 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConcept C2779723990 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConcept C2780026749 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConceptScore W4311733645C126322002 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConceptScore W4311733645C141071460 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConceptScore W4311733645C156957248 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConceptScore W4311733645C164705383 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConceptScore W4311733645C2777327002 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConceptScore W4311733645C2778589496 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConceptScore W4311733645C2779495589 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConceptScore W4311733645C2779723990 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConceptScore W4311733645C2780007028 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConceptScore W4311733645C2780026749 @default.
- W4311733645 hasConceptScore W4311733645C71924100 @default.
- W4311733645 hasIssue "Supplement_K" @default.
- W4311733645 hasLocation W43117336451 @default.
- W4311733645 hasOpenAccess W4311733645 @default.
- W4311733645 hasPrimaryLocation W43117336451 @default.
- W4311733645 hasRelatedWork W1978120312 @default.
- W4311733645 hasRelatedWork W2001477670 @default.
- W4311733645 hasRelatedWork W2019884956 @default.
- W4311733645 hasRelatedWork W2032778284 @default.
- W4311733645 hasRelatedWork W2042725010 @default.
- W4311733645 hasRelatedWork W2139946380 @default.
- W4311733645 hasRelatedWork W2155998597 @default.
- W4311733645 hasRelatedWork W2999974533 @default.
- W4311733645 hasRelatedWork W3187834643 @default.
- W4311733645 hasRelatedWork W4280548745 @default.
- W4311733645 hasVolume "24" @default.
- W4311733645 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4311733645 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4311733645 workType "article" @default.