FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4311773705> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4311773705 endingPage "253" @default.
• W4311773705 startingPage "252" @default.
• W4311773705 abstract "We thank Li et al for their comments1Li Z Hu Y Li Q et al.In regard to Koulahdouzan et al.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023; 115: 251-252Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1) Google Scholar on our article “Low-Dose Whole Lung Irradiation for Treatment of COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.”2Kolahdouzan K Chavoshi M Bayani R Darzikolaee NM. Low-dose whole lung irradiation for treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022; 113: 946-959Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar The authors note important issues that we will respond to in this letter. First, as we mentioned in the article, our search included studies that were published before February 2022; the studies noted by the authors as not having been included in our systematic review all were published after this time point. Also, the final results of the LOWRAD-Cov19 trial3Sanmamed N Alcantara P Gómez S et al.Low-dose radiation therapy in the management of COVID-19 pneumonia (LOWRAD-Cov19): Final results of a prospective phase I-II trial.Radiother Oncol. 2022; 171: 25-29Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar were detected during the peer review process of our manuscript and were subsequently included in the final publication. Second, regarding the search strategy of our study, we chose the 2 most robust databases (PubMed and Scopus), and there have been no missing articles associated with COVID-19 whole lung irradiation (WLI) published until our last search date. Moreover, both MeSH and free-text terms were used for our search. Third, all ongoing trials on the subject that were registered at clinicaltrials.gov were presented as a supplementary table. We are also very eager to find out the results of these trials so that an updated meta-analysis might bring more light to the matter after the publication of these studies. Fourth, performing a sensitivity analysis for the overall survival rate outcome would have been futile, because it is not a comparative outcome and merely reports the rate of surviving patients who received WLI. Fifth, considering the risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, and publication bias as per grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations certainty assessment requirements,4Higgins JPT Thomas J Chandler J et al.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane, Chichester (UK)2022http://www.training.cochrane.org/handbookGoogle Scholar the upcoming results of the ongoing trials are likely to affect the confidence in the estimates of effect for the outcomes reported in our meta-analysis, and therefore, the quality of evidence might not be higher than moderate.5Guyatt GH Oxman AD Vist GE et al.GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.BMJ. 2008; 336: 924-926Crossref PubMed Google Scholar We clearly stated these factors within the article. Finally, we should once again emphasize that our meta-analysis did not demonstrate a significant benefit of WLI for COVID-19 patients with moderate to severe pneumonia, and therefore, it does not support evidence for routine implementation of WLI in this population. Similar to Li et al, we believe that an updated meta-analysis after the publication of the major trials in this regard might provide new information, although it is very unlikely to change the current COVID-19 management strategies with the major vaccination programs and novel therapeutics available." @default.
• W4311773705 created "2022-12-28" @default.
• W4311773705 creator A5009060599 @default.
• W4311773705 creator A5066527193 @default.
• W4311773705 creator A5080518677 @default.
• W4311773705 creator A5083224968 @default.
• W4311773705 date "2023-01-01" @default.
• W4311773705 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4311773705 title "In Reply to Li et al." @default.
• W4311773705 cites W2165010366 @default.
• W4311773705 cites W2978795816 @default.
• W4311773705 cites W4220812614 @default.
• W4311773705 cites W4229055085 @default.
• W4311773705 cites W4311773306 @default.
• W4311773705 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.053" @default.
• W4311773705 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36526388" @default.
• W4311773705 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4311773705 type Work @default.
• W4311773705 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4311773705 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4311773705 hasAuthorship W4311773705A5009060599 @default.
• W4311773705 hasAuthorship W4311773705A5066527193 @default.
• W4311773705 hasAuthorship W4311773705A5080518677 @default.
• W4311773705 hasAuthorship W4311773705A5083224968 @default.
• W4311773705 hasBestOaLocation W43117737051 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConcept C2777914695 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConcept C3008058167 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConcept C3020774429 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConcept C524204448 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConceptScore W4311773705C126322002 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConceptScore W4311773705C17744445 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConceptScore W4311773705C189708586 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConceptScore W4311773705C199539241 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConceptScore W4311773705C2777914695 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConceptScore W4311773705C2779134260 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConceptScore W4311773705C2779473830 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConceptScore W4311773705C3008058167 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConceptScore W4311773705C3020774429 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConceptScore W4311773705C524204448 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConceptScore W4311773705C71924100 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConceptScore W4311773705C83867959 @default.
• W4311773705 hasConceptScore W4311773705C95190672 @default.
• W4311773705 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4311773705 hasLocation W43117737051 @default.
• W4311773705 hasLocation W43117737052 @default.
• W4311773705 hasLocation W43117737053 @default.
• W4311773705 hasOpenAccess W4311773705 @default.
• W4311773705 hasPrimaryLocation W43117737051 @default.
• W4311773705 hasRelatedWork W2735972601 @default.
• W4311773705 hasRelatedWork W2903008839 @default.
• W4311773705 hasRelatedWork W3027459656 @default.
• W4311773705 hasRelatedWork W3118464259 @default.
• W4311773705 hasRelatedWork W3134414398 @default.
• W4311773705 hasRelatedWork W3142180870 @default.
• W4311773705 hasRelatedWork W3159663348 @default.
• W4311773705 hasRelatedWork W4224227176 @default.
• W4311773705 hasRelatedWork W4304775918 @default.
• W4311773705 hasRelatedWork W4315436681 @default.
• W4311773705 hasVolume "115" @default.
• W4311773705 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4311773705 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4311773705 workType "article" @default.