FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4311891569> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4311891569 endingPage "162" @default.
• W4311891569 startingPage "1" @default.
• W4311891569 abstract "Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. Surgery remains the main method of managing early-stage disease. Minimal-access video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery results in less tissue trauma than open surgery; however, it is not known if it improves patient outcomes.To compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy with open surgery for the treatment of lung cancer.A multicentre, superiority, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial with blinding of participants (until hospital discharge) and outcome assessors conducted in nine NHS hospitals. Adults referred for lung resection for known or suspected lung cancer, with disease suitable for both surgeries, were eligible. Participants were followed up for 1 year.Participants were randomised 1 : 1 to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy or open surgery. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery used one to four keyhole incisions without rib spreading. Open surgery used a single incision with rib spreading, with or without rib resection.The primary outcome was self-reported physical function (using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30) at 5 weeks. Secondary outcomes included upstaging to pathologic node stage 2 disease, time from surgery to hospital discharge, pain in the first 2 days, prolonged pain requiring analgesia at > 5 weeks, adverse health events, uptake of adjuvant treatment, overall and disease-free survival, quality of life (Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30, Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 and EQ-5D) at 2 and 5 weeks and 3, 6 and 12 months, and cost-effectiveness.A total of 503 patients were randomised between July 2015 and February 2019 (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, n = 247; open surgery, n = 256). One participant withdrew before surgery. The mean age of patients was 69 years; 249 (49.5%) patients were men and 242 (48.1%) did not have a confirmed diagnosis. Lobectomy was performed in 453 of 502 (90.2%) participants and complete resection was achieved in 429 of 439 (97.7%) participants. Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 physical function was better in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group than in the open-surgery group at 5 weeks (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, n = 247; open surgery, n = 255; mean difference 4.65, 95% confidence interval 1.69 to 7.61; p = 0.0089). Upstaging from clinical node stage 0 to pathologic node stage 1 and from clinical node stage 0 or 1 to pathologic node stage 2 was similar (p ≥ 0.50). Pain scores were similar on day 1, but lower in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group on day 2 (mean difference -0.54, 95% confidence interval -0.99 to -0.09; p = 0.018). Analgesic consumption was 10% lower (95% CI -20% to 1%) and the median hospital stay was less (4 vs. 5 days, hazard ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 1.09, 1.65; p = 0.006) in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group than in the open-surgery group. Prolonged pain was also less (relative risk 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 0.94; p = 0.003). Time to uptake of adjuvant treatment, overall survival and progression-free survival were similar (p ≥ 0.28). Fewer participants in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group than in the open-surgery group experienced complications before and after discharge from hospital (relative risk 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.84; p < 0.001 and relative risk 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.00; p = 0.053, respectively). Quality of life to 1 year was better across several domains in the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group than in the open-surgery group. The probability that video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year is 1.Ethnic minorities were under-represented compared with the UK population (< 5%), but the cohort reflected the lung cancer population.Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy was associated with less pain, fewer complications and better quality of life without any compromise to oncologic outcome. Use of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is highly likely to be cost-effective for the NHS.Evaluation of the efficacy of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with robotic assistance, which is being offered in many hospitals.This trial is registered as ISRCTN13472721.This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research ( NIHR ) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 48. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.Lung cancer is a common cause of cancer death worldwide. If the disease is caught early, the part of the lung containing the tumour can be removed in an operation called a lobectomy. The operation can be carried out through a large cut so that the surgeon has a full view of the lung, which is called open surgery, or using several small cuts and a camera, which is called video-assisted thoracoscopic (keyhole) surgery. It is thought that, as keyhole surgery is less invasive, patients recover quicker. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no high-quality research studies that are applicable to UK practice to support this. This study was conducted so that it could be determined, based on high-quality evidence, which operation provides the best treatment and recovery for patients.Five hundred and three adults referred for lobectomy for known or suspected lung cancer from nine hospitals in the UK.Participants were randomly allocated to either receive keyhole or open surgery. Participants were followed up for 12 months. We collected information on further treatment, hospital visits, safety information and disease progression over this period. Participants were also asked to complete questionnaires about their health and recovery.For patients with early-stage lung cancer who underwent a lobectomy, keyhole surgery led to less pain, less time in hospital and better quality of life than open surgery, without having a detrimental effect on cancer progression or survival. Keyhole surgery was found to be cost-effective and to provide excellent value for money for the NHS." @default.
• W4311891569 created "2023-01-02" @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5006052297 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5007833294 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5009968504 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5012788525 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5019408818 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5020044189 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5025849476 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5032968318 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5037865543 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5039913379 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5050226562 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5051147025 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5056372307 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5058220226 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5059252783 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5069439470 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5073437777 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5082679849 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5082910402 @default.
• W4311891569 creator A5085125702 @default.
• W4311891569 date "2022-12-01" @default.
• W4311891569 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W4311891569 title "Impact of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus open lobectomy for lung cancer on recovery assessed using self-reported physical function: VIOLET RCT" @default.
• W4311891569 cites W1841572063 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W1971883474 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W1990166011 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W1994222210 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W1997436255 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W1999605433 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2011524302 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2013333053 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2013564592 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2015805367 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2021720741 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2032541700 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2080663986 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2081859324 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2083018547 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2087810839 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2105696810 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2110065044 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2118249259 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2118502261 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2123572561 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2128614409 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2129915352 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2134843796 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2146074984 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2148456386 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2151182129 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2169376864 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2269588095 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2318485095 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2347096938 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2414442728 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2473786944 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2539317882 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2620883902 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2621322203 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2626329845 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2733091225 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2768174054 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2769011346 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2775098809 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2784969024 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2793916186 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2897175288 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2917915033 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2922139162 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W2970157210 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W3111825962 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W4206710770 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W4233016419 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W4251695993 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W4311891569 @default.
• W4311891569 cites W4967412 @default.
• W4311891569 doi "https://doi.org/10.3310/thbq1793" @default.
• W4311891569 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36524582" @default.
• W4311891569 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4311891569 type Work @default.
• W4311891569 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W4311891569 countsByYear W43118915692022 @default.
• W4311891569 countsByYear W43118915692023 @default.
• W4311891569 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4311891569 hasAuthorship W4311891569A5006052297 @default.
• W4311891569 hasAuthorship W4311891569A5007833294 @default.
• W4311891569 hasAuthorship W4311891569A5009968504 @default.
• W4311891569 hasAuthorship W4311891569A5012788525 @default.
• W4311891569 hasAuthorship W4311891569A5019408818 @default.
• W4311891569 hasAuthorship W4311891569A5020044189 @default.
• W4311891569 hasAuthorship W4311891569A5025849476 @default.
• W4311891569 hasAuthorship W4311891569A5032968318 @default.
• W4311891569 hasAuthorship W4311891569A5037865543 @default.
• W4311891569 hasAuthorship W4311891569A5039913379 @default.
• W4311891569 hasAuthorship W4311891569A5050226562 @default.
• W4311891569 hasAuthorship W4311891569A5051147025 @default.

• next