FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4311892899> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4311892899 endingPage "318" @default.
• W4311892899 startingPage "313" @default.
• W4311892899 abstract "The two most common revision options available for the management of loose pedicle screws are larger-diameter screws and cement augmentation into the vertebral body for secondary fixation. An alternative revision method is impaction grafting (pedicoplasty) of the failed pedicle screw track. This technique uses the impaction of corticocancellous bone into the pedicle and vertebral body through a series of custom funnels to reconstitute a new pedicle wall and a neomedullary canal. The goal of this study was to compare the biomechanics of screws inserted after pedicoplasty (impaction grafting) of a pedicle defect to those of an upsized screw and a cement-augmented screw.For this biomechanical cadaveric study the investigators used 10 vertebral bodies (L1-5) that were free of metastatic disease or primary bone disease. Following initial screw insertion, each screw was subjected to a pullout force that was applied axially along the screw trajectory at 5 mm per minute until failure. Each specimen was instrumented with a pedicoplasty revision using the original screw diameter, and on the contralateral side either a fenestrated screw with cement augmentation or a screw upsized by 1 mm was inserted in a randomized fashion. These revisions were then pulled out using the previously mentioned methods.Initial screw pullout values for the paired upsized screw and pedicoplasty were 717 ± 511 N and 774 ± 414 N, respectively (p = 0.747) (n = 14). Revised pullout values for the paired upsized screw and pedicoplasty were 775 ± 461 N and 762 ± 320 N, respectively (p = 0.932). Initial pullout values for the paired cement augmentation and pedicoplasty were 792 ± 434 N and 880 ± 558 N, respectively (p = 0.649). Revised pullout values for the paired cement augmentation and pedicoplasty were 1159 ± 300 N and 687 ± 213 N, respectively (p < 0.001).Pedicle defects are difficult to manage. Reconstitution of the pedicle and creation of a neomedullary canal appears to be possible through the use of pedicoplasty. Biomechanically, screws that have been used in pedicoplasty have equivalent pullout strength to an upsized screw, and have greater insertional torques than those with the same diameter that have not been used in pedicoplasty, yet they are not superior to cement augmentation. This study suggests that although cement augmentation appears to have superior pullout force, the novel pedicoplasty technique offers promise as a viable biological revision option for the management of failed pedicle screws compared with the option of standard upsized screws in a cadaveric model. These findings will ultimately need to be further assessed in a clinical setting." @default.
• W4311892899 created "2023-01-02" @default.
• W4311892899 creator A5010965740 @default.
• W4311892899 creator A5011933014 @default.
• W4311892899 creator A5015203185 @default.
• W4311892899 creator A5020116581 @default.
• W4311892899 creator A5026655397 @default.
• W4311892899 creator A5039281024 @default.
• W4311892899 creator A5044739753 @default.
• W4311892899 creator A5055322528 @default.
• W4311892899 date "2023-03-01" @default.
• W4311892899 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W4311892899 title "Impaction grafting of lumbar pedicle defects: a biomechanical study of a novel technique for pedicle screw revision" @default.
• W4311892899 cites W1966804963 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W1993147295 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W2028096427 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W2029636776 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W2030967154 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W2054202041 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W2081258070 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W2092361562 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W2100968284 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W2122128171 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W2131731048 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W2134136356 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W2148581086 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W2578837154 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W2589833424 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W2767869767 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W2800276069 @default.
• W4311892899 cites W3204192258 @default.
• W4311892899 doi "https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.10.spine22351" @default.
• W4311892899 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36683188" @default.
• W4311892899 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4311892899 type Work @default.
• W4311892899 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4311892899 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4311892899 hasAuthorship W4311892899A5010965740 @default.
• W4311892899 hasAuthorship W4311892899A5011933014 @default.
• W4311892899 hasAuthorship W4311892899A5015203185 @default.
• W4311892899 hasAuthorship W4311892899A5020116581 @default.
• W4311892899 hasAuthorship W4311892899A5026655397 @default.
• W4311892899 hasAuthorship W4311892899A5039281024 @default.
• W4311892899 hasAuthorship W4311892899A5044739753 @default.
• W4311892899 hasAuthorship W4311892899A5055322528 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConcept C170700871 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConcept C2776337968 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConcept C2779835254 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConcept C2780051367 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConceptScore W4311892899C105702510 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConceptScore W4311892899C141071460 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConceptScore W4311892899C146249460 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConceptScore W4311892899C170700871 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConceptScore W4311892899C175696284 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConceptScore W4311892899C2776337968 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConceptScore W4311892899C2779835254 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConceptScore W4311892899C2780051367 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConceptScore W4311892899C2908647359 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConceptScore W4311892899C29694066 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConceptScore W4311892899C44575665 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConceptScore W4311892899C71924100 @default.
• W4311892899 hasConceptScore W4311892899C99454951 @default.
• W4311892899 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4311892899 hasLocation W43118928991 @default.
• W4311892899 hasLocation W43118928992 @default.
• W4311892899 hasOpenAccess W4311892899 @default.
• W4311892899 hasPrimaryLocation W43118928991 @default.
• W4311892899 hasRelatedWork W2049524729 @default.
• W4311892899 hasRelatedWork W2073005182 @default.
• W4311892899 hasRelatedWork W2087965305 @default.
• W4311892899 hasRelatedWork W2091636588 @default.
• W4311892899 hasRelatedWork W2345078034 @default.
• W4311892899 hasRelatedWork W2765248861 @default.
• W4311892899 hasRelatedWork W2989817448 @default.
• W4311892899 hasRelatedWork W3029125209 @default.
• W4311892899 hasRelatedWork W3164641224 @default.
• W4311892899 hasRelatedWork W4311892899 @default.
• W4311892899 hasVolume "38" @default.
• W4311892899 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4311892899 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4311892899 workType "article" @default.