FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4311898032> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4311898032 endingPage "413" @default.
• W4311898032 startingPage "413" @default.
• W4311898032 abstract "Introduction: Intubation in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) involves teamwork between a proceduralist and team leader. Improved team dynamics may minimize harm to patients during this high-risk procedure. Video laryngoscopy (VL) allows multiple team members to view the glottic anatomy. Although VL use has increased, little is known about its influence on team dynamics. Our aim was to compare cognitive load, team member stress, and provision of feedback during VL versus direct laryngoscopy (DL) intubations. Methods: We prospectively studied intubations performed by the critical care team for children < 18 years old in an academic PICU from November 2021 to May 2022. Proceduralists and team leaders completed brief surveys after each intubation. We defined cognitive load using the validated Paas scale (range: 0-9) and the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX, range: 0-100 on each of six domains). Team members were also queried regarding stress levels, perceptions of feedback, and confidence in endotracheal tube placement. Chi squared analysis was used to compare DL and VL. Results: Among 45 intubations during the study period, 41 surveys were completed by the proceduralist and 39 surveys were completed by the team leader. When measured using the Paas scale, cognitive load did not differ between VL and DL for the proceduralist or the team leader (P>0.05). When measured using NASA-TLX, cognitive load only differed for the proceduralist in 2 domains: increased effort (62.7 with VL vs. 49.4 with DL, P=0.017) and reduced performance (41.9 with VL vs. 17.4 with DL, P=0.044). Stress levels did not differ between VL and DL (P>0.05). The proceduralist received feedback more often with VL than DL (100% vs. 68%, p=0.005), however the team lead did not perceive a difference in ease of giving feedback with VL versus DL (P>0.05). The team leader had increased confidence in correct endotracheal tube placement using VL versus DL (3 vs. 2.84, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Although VL allows for a shared mental model during intubation by projecting glottic anatomy onto a screen, its use does not reduce team stress or cognitive load. Furthermore, the proceduralist finds VL to require more effort and decrease performance compared to DL. This may be due to less familiarity with VL or use of VL in more clinically stressful situations." @default.
• W4311898032 created "2023-01-02" @default.
• W4311898032 creator A5007950138 @default.
• W4311898032 creator A5038200389 @default.
• W4311898032 date "2022-12-15" @default.
• W4311898032 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4311898032 title "843: VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPY AND TEAM DYNAMICS DURING INTUBATION" @default.
• W4311898032 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000909100.38857.4f" @default.
• W4311898032 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4311898032 type Work @default.
• W4311898032 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4311898032 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4311898032 hasAuthorship W4311898032A5007950138 @default.
• W4311898032 hasAuthorship W4311898032A5038200389 @default.
• W4311898032 hasBestOaLocation W43118980321 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C111226992 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C2776376669 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C2776888792 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C2777363581 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C3019038464 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C111226992 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C118552586 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C15744967 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C169900460 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C17744445 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C177713679 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C194828623 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C199539241 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C2776376669 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C2776888792 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C2777363581 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C2778716859 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C3019038464 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C42219234 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C545542383 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C71924100 @default.
• W4311898032 hasConceptScore W4311898032C77805123 @default.
• W4311898032 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4311898032 hasLocation W43118980321 @default.
• W4311898032 hasLocation W43118980322 @default.
• W4311898032 hasOpenAccess W4311898032 @default.
• W4311898032 hasPrimaryLocation W43118980321 @default.
• W4311898032 hasRelatedWork W2085118770 @default.
• W4311898032 hasRelatedWork W2128992667 @default.
• W4311898032 hasRelatedWork W2166295305 @default.
• W4311898032 hasRelatedWork W2349271831 @default.
• W4311898032 hasRelatedWork W2410378743 @default.
• W4311898032 hasRelatedWork W2415317982 @default.
• W4311898032 hasRelatedWork W2983302711 @default.
• W4311898032 hasRelatedWork W3033033710 @default.
• W4311898032 hasRelatedWork W3034882672 @default.
• W4311898032 hasRelatedWork W3089602614 @default.
• W4311898032 hasVolume "51" @default.
• W4311898032 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4311898032 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4311898032 workType "article" @default.