FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4311898035> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4311898035 endingPage "411" @default.
• W4311898035 startingPage "411" @default.
• W4311898035 abstract "Introduction: Endotracheal intubation is a life-saving procedure with several indications. Successful placement of the endotracheal tube on the first attempt greatly reduces the risk of complications. The endotracheal introducer (commonly known as the bougie) and the stylet are two different devices used to facilitate orotracheal intubations in various settings. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the likelihood of successful first attempt intubation using either of the two devices. Methods: A search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science. We used the following mesh terms, “(endotracheal intubation) OR (orotracheal intubation) AND (bougie) OR (gum elastic bougie) OR (endotracheal introducer) OR (stylet)” from the 01/01/2000 to 07/15/2022. We screened 3100 articles out of which 4 randomized controlled trials comparing the use of bougie and stylet were included in this systematic review. Studies performed on cadavers/mannequins, population age less than 18, and out-of-hospital intubations were excluded from this review. Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis consisted of 4 randomized controlled trials with a total population of 1962. The mean age for the bougie group was 52.7 years and the stylet group was 52.8 years. The average body mass index for the bougie and stylet groups was 26.8 Kg/m2 and 27.1 Kg/m2, respectively. When a random effects model was applied, the metanalysis did not show any significant differences in the first attempt success rate with a risk ratio of 0.957; 95% confidence interval, 0.833 to 1.100. Reported complications included hypoxemia, esophageal intubation, pneumothorax, and cardiovascular collapse with no significant differences in the two groups. Conclusions: The bougie and stylet had comparable rates of first attempt intubation with neither being superior to the other. The healthcare provider should take into consideration their ease and comfort of intubation with each technique before opting for one during intubation." @default.
• W4311898035 created "2023-01-02" @default.
• W4311898035 creator A5005538345 @default.
• W4311898035 creator A5020086513 @default.
• W4311898035 creator A5032270852 @default.
• W4311898035 creator A5048044760 @default.
• W4311898035 date "2022-12-15" @default.
• W4311898035 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4311898035 title "840: TO BOUGIE OR NOT TO BOUGIE: META-ANALYSIS COMPARING FIRST-ATTEMPT INTUBATION WITH BOUGIE AND STYLET" @default.
• W4311898035 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000909088.52682.47" @default.
• W4311898035 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4311898035 type Work @default.
• W4311898035 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4311898035 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4311898035 hasAuthorship W4311898035A5005538345 @default.
• W4311898035 hasAuthorship W4311898035A5020086513 @default.
• W4311898035 hasAuthorship W4311898035A5032270852 @default.
• W4311898035 hasAuthorship W4311898035A5048044760 @default.
• W4311898035 hasBestOaLocation W43118980351 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConcept C2776410716 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConcept C3019038464 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConceptScore W4311898035C126322002 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConceptScore W4311898035C141071460 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConceptScore W4311898035C2776410716 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConceptScore W4311898035C2778716859 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConceptScore W4311898035C2908647359 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConceptScore W4311898035C3019038464 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConceptScore W4311898035C42219234 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConceptScore W4311898035C44249647 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConceptScore W4311898035C71924100 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConceptScore W4311898035C95190672 @default.
• W4311898035 hasConceptScore W4311898035C99454951 @default.
• W4311898035 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4311898035 hasLocation W43118980351 @default.
• W4311898035 hasLocation W43118980352 @default.
• W4311898035 hasOpenAccess W4311898035 @default.
• W4311898035 hasPrimaryLocation W43118980351 @default.
• W4311898035 hasRelatedWork W2133134420 @default.
• W4311898035 hasRelatedWork W2283921944 @default.
• W4311898035 hasRelatedWork W2464011842 @default.
• W4311898035 hasRelatedWork W2767440484 @default.
• W4311898035 hasRelatedWork W2883803686 @default.
• W4311898035 hasRelatedWork W2896605477 @default.
• W4311898035 hasRelatedWork W4221021610 @default.
• W4311898035 hasRelatedWork W4224234316 @default.
• W4311898035 hasRelatedWork W4226324266 @default.
• W4311898035 hasRelatedWork W4237592156 @default.
• W4311898035 hasVolume "51" @default.
• W4311898035 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4311898035 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4311898035 workType "article" @default.