FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4312094899> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4312094899 endingPage "587" @default.
• W4312094899 startingPage "572" @default.
• W4312094899 abstract "Objectives: The ability to adapt to subtle variations in acoustic input is a necessary skill for successful speech perception. Cochlear implant (CI) users tend to show speech perception benefits from the maintenance of their residual acoustic hearing. However, previous studies often compare CI users in different listening conditions within-subjects (i.e., in their typical Acoustic + Electric configuration compared with Acoustic-only or Electric-only configurations) and comparisons among different groups of CI users do not always reflect an Acoustic + Electric benefit. Existing work suggests that CI users with residual acoustic hearing perform similarly to Electric-only listeners on phonetic voicing contrasts and unexpectedly poorer with fricative contrasts which have little energy in the range of the Acoustic + Electric listeners’ acoustic hearing. To further investigate how residual acoustic hearing impacts sensitivity to phonetic ambiguity, we examined whether device configuration, age, and device experience influenced phonetic categorization in a large individual differences study. Design: CI users with various device configurations (Electric-only N = 41; Acoustic + Electric N = 95) categorized tokens from five /b-p/ and five /s-ʃ/ minimal pair continua (e.g., bet-pet; sock-shock). We investigated age, device experience, and when applicable, residual acoustic hearing (pure tone hearing thresholds) as predictors of categorization. We also examined the relationship between phonetic categorization and clinical outcomes (CNC, AzBio) in a subset of our sample. Results: Acoustic + Electric CI users were better able to categorize along the voicing contrast (steeper categorization slope) compared with Electric-only users, but there was no group-level difference for fricatives. There were differences within the subgroups for fricatives: bilateral users showed better categorization than unilateral users and bimodal users had better categorization than hybrid users. Age was a significant factor for voicing, while device experience was significant for fricatives. Critically, within the Acoustic + Electric group, hybrid CI users had shallower slopes than bimodal CI users. Conclusions: Our findings suggest residual acoustic hearing is beneficial for categorizing stop voicing, but not frication. Age impacts the categorization of voicing, while device experience matters for fricatives. For CI users with ipsilateral residual acoustic hearing, those with better hearing thresholds may be over-relying on their acoustic hearing rather than extracting as much information as possible from their CI, and thus have shallower fricative categorization." @default.
• W4312094899 created "2023-01-04" @default.
• W4312094899 creator A5005718268 @default.
• W4312094899 creator A5027472084 @default.
• W4312094899 creator A5057641915 @default.
• W4312094899 date "2022-12-21" @default.
• W4312094899 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4312094899 title "Audiological and Demographic Factors that Impact the Precision of Speech Categorization in Cochlear Implant Users" @default.
• W4312094899 cites W1272428283 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W1601683761 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W1966395315 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W1987289325 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2006571108 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2016399083 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2023969516 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2025277442 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2031022810 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2031821475 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2035171148 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2044197434 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2070407610 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2078417517 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2079840563 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2110472081 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2111376597 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2114555589 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2119871874 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2135342477 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2137027522 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2137767367 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2140789293 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2149904637 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2157280730 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2606188279 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2766325617 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W2776941264 @default.
• W4312094899 cites W3163134504 @default.
• W4312094899 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001307" @default.
• W4312094899 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36542839" @default.
• W4312094899 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4312094899 type Work @default.
• W4312094899 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4312094899 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4312094899 hasAuthorship W4312094899A5005718268 @default.
• W4312094899 hasAuthorship W4312094899A5027472084 @default.
• W4312094899 hasAuthorship W4312094899A5057641915 @default.
• W4312094899 hasBestOaLocation W43120948992 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C177291462 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C24890656 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C2776502983 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C2778882171 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C2780493683 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C28490314 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C552089266 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C94124525 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConcept C99209842 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C121332964 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C154945302 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C15744967 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C169760540 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C177291462 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C24890656 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C26760741 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C2776502983 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C2778882171 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C2780493683 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C28490314 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C41008148 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C46312422 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C548259974 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C552089266 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C71924100 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C94124525 @default.
• W4312094899 hasConceptScore W4312094899C99209842 @default.
• W4312094899 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4312094899 hasLocation W43120948991 @default.
• W4312094899 hasLocation W43120948992 @default.
• W4312094899 hasLocation W43120948993 @default.
• W4312094899 hasLocation W43120948994 @default.
• W4312094899 hasOpenAccess W4312094899 @default.
• W4312094899 hasPrimaryLocation W43120948991 @default.
• W4312094899 hasRelatedWork W1781684163 @default.
• W4312094899 hasRelatedWork W191642352 @default.
• W4312094899 hasRelatedWork W1976205004 @default.
• W4312094899 hasRelatedWork W2088035774 @default.
• W4312094899 hasRelatedWork W2092692231 @default.
• W4312094899 hasRelatedWork W2095143797 @default.
• W4312094899 hasRelatedWork W2295668095 @default.
• W4312094899 hasRelatedWork W2386885324 @default.

• next