Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4312107254> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 71 of
71
with 100 items per page.
- W4312107254 endingPage "16" @default.
- W4312107254 startingPage "1" @default.
- W4312107254 abstract "Graphical perception studies typically measure visualization encoding effectiveness using the error of an “average observer”, leading to canonical rankings of encodings for numerical attributes: <italic xmlns:mml=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML xmlns:xlink=http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink>e.g.</i> , position <inline-formula xmlns:mml=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML xmlns:xlink=http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink><tex-math notation=LaTeX>$>$</tex-math></inline-formula> area <inline-formula xmlns:mml=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML xmlns:xlink=http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink><tex-math notation=LaTeX>$>$</tex-math></inline-formula> angle <inline-formula xmlns:mml=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML xmlns:xlink=http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink><tex-math notation=LaTeX>$>$</tex-math></inline-formula> volume. Yet different people may vary in their ability to read different visualization types, leading to variance in this ranking across individuals not captured by population-level metrics using “average observer” models. One way we can bridge this gap is by recasting classic visual perception tasks as tools for assessing individual performance, in addition to overall visualization performance. In this paper we replicate and extend Cleveland and McGill's graphical comparison experiment using Bayesian multilevel regression, using these models to explore individual differences in visualization skill from multiple perspectives. The results from experiments and modeling indicate that some people show patterns of accuracy that credibly deviate from the canonical rankings of visualization effectiveness. We discuss implications of these findings, such as a need for new ways to communicate visualization effectiveness to designers, how patterns in individuals' responses may show systematic biases and strategies in visualization judgment, and how recasting classic visual perception tasks as tools for assessing individual performance may offer new ways to quantify aspects of visualization literacy. Experiment data, source code, and analysis scripts are available at the following repository: <uri xmlns:mml=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML xmlns:xlink=http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink>https://osf.io/8ub7t/?view_only=9be4798797404a4397be3c6fc2a68cc0</uri> ." @default.
- W4312107254 created "2023-01-04" @default.
- W4312107254 creator A5007543898 @default.
- W4312107254 creator A5013649746 @default.
- W4312107254 creator A5028916631 @default.
- W4312107254 creator A5041775342 @default.
- W4312107254 creator A5043206563 @default.
- W4312107254 creator A5085906659 @default.
- W4312107254 creator A5087146581 @default.
- W4312107254 creator A5089605137 @default.
- W4312107254 date "2022-01-01" @default.
- W4312107254 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W4312107254 title "The Risks of Ranking: Revisiting Graphical Perception to Model Individual Differences in Visualization Performance" @default.
- W4312107254 doi "https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2022.3226463" @default.
- W4312107254 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37015487" @default.
- W4312107254 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4312107254 type Work @default.
- W4312107254 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4312107254 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4312107254 hasAuthorship W4312107254A5007543898 @default.
- W4312107254 hasAuthorship W4312107254A5013649746 @default.
- W4312107254 hasAuthorship W4312107254A5028916631 @default.
- W4312107254 hasAuthorship W4312107254A5041775342 @default.
- W4312107254 hasAuthorship W4312107254A5043206563 @default.
- W4312107254 hasAuthorship W4312107254A5085906659 @default.
- W4312107254 hasAuthorship W4312107254A5087146581 @default.
- W4312107254 hasAuthorship W4312107254A5089605137 @default.
- W4312107254 hasBestOaLocation W43121072542 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConcept C172367668 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConcept C36464697 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConcept C45357846 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConcept C94375191 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConceptScore W4312107254C144024400 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConceptScore W4312107254C149923435 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConceptScore W4312107254C154945302 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConceptScore W4312107254C172367668 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConceptScore W4312107254C189430467 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConceptScore W4312107254C2908647359 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConceptScore W4312107254C33923547 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConceptScore W4312107254C36464697 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConceptScore W4312107254C41008148 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConceptScore W4312107254C45357846 @default.
- W4312107254 hasConceptScore W4312107254C94375191 @default.
- W4312107254 hasFunder F4320306076 @default.
- W4312107254 hasLocation W43121072541 @default.
- W4312107254 hasLocation W43121072542 @default.
- W4312107254 hasLocation W43121072543 @default.
- W4312107254 hasOpenAccess W4312107254 @default.
- W4312107254 hasPrimaryLocation W43121072541 @default.
- W4312107254 hasRelatedWork W1493022169 @default.
- W4312107254 hasRelatedWork W1584304702 @default.
- W4312107254 hasRelatedWork W1604110270 @default.
- W4312107254 hasRelatedWork W1972863089 @default.
- W4312107254 hasRelatedWork W2100045884 @default.
- W4312107254 hasRelatedWork W2525150146 @default.
- W4312107254 hasRelatedWork W2792152840 @default.
- W4312107254 hasRelatedWork W3142750684 @default.
- W4312107254 hasRelatedWork W4236120004 @default.
- W4312107254 hasRelatedWork W4313428666 @default.
- W4312107254 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4312107254 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4312107254 workType "article" @default.