FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4312114969> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4312114969 endingPage "238146832211437" @default.
• W4312114969 startingPage "238146832211437" @default.
• W4312114969 abstract "Background. Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia who are facing a lower-limb amputation often require a transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) or a transtibial amputation (TTA). A TMA preserves more of the patient's limb and may provide better mobility but has a lower probability of primary wound healing relative to a TTA and may result in additional amputation surgeries. Understanding the differences in how patients and providers prioritize key outcomes may enhance the amputation decisional process. Purpose. To develop and pilot test a multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tool to elicit patient values around amputation-level selection and compare those with provider perceptions of patient values. Methods. We conducted literature reviews to identify and measure the performance of criteria important to patients. Because the quantitative literature was sparse, we developed a Sheffield elicitation framework exercise to elicit criteria performance from subject matter experts. We piloted our MCDA among patients and providers to understand tool acceptability and preliminarily assess differences in patient and provider priorities. Results. Five criteria of importance were identified: ability to walk, healing after amputation surgery, rehabilitation intensity, limb length, and prosthetic/orthotic device ease. Patients and providers successfully completed the MCDA and identified challenges in doing so. We propose potential solutions to these challenges. The results of the pilot test suggest differences in patient and provider outcome priorities. Limitations. The pilot test study enrolled a small sample of providers and patients. Conclusions. We successfully implemented the pilot study to patients and providers, received helpful feedback, and identified solutions to improve the tool. Implications. Once modified, our MCDA tool will be suitable for wider rollout.Patients and providers have successfully completed our MCDA, and patients feel the MCDA may be useful in clinical practice.We encountered several methodologic challenges and identified approaches to ease participant burden.When data are sparse, using the Sheffield elicitation framework is helpful in creating a performance matrix, although patients relied largely on their amputation experiences to complete the exercise. Blinding the alternatives may help patients better understand the process." @default.
• W4312114969 created "2023-01-04" @default.
• W4312114969 creator A5008934716 @default.
• W4312114969 creator A5046147795 @default.
• W4312114969 creator A5069626566 @default.
• W4312114969 creator A5077227000 @default.
• W4312114969 creator A5088202095 @default.
• W4312114969 creator A5091498231 @default.
• W4312114969 date "2022-07-01" @default.
• W4312114969 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4312114969 title "The Development and Pilot Study of a Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to Compare Patient and Provider Priorities around Amputation-Level Outcomes" @default.
• W4312114969 cites W14564450 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W1549526039 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W1553038629 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W158950929 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W1974868221 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W1992692645 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2000481181 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2007302599 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2010264540 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2014565523 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2016430712 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2029278175 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2040823653 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2045734328 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2051585752 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2053073741 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2065560066 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2075675981 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2080447961 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2098345046 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2099892962 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2121713767 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2141848606 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2146392373 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2154664434 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2155897259 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2239810687 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2294402265 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2307258287 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2339282435 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2486391763 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2573694657 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2596830302 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2614176145 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2772957492 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2801034992 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2902742382 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2903390663 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2914863039 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2921547145 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2946019021 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2947691792 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W2949242381 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W3048460571 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W3092985072 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W4230507407 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W4233433085 @default.
• W4312114969 cites W59413458 @default.
• W4312114969 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683221143765" @default.
• W4312114969 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36545397" @default.
• W4312114969 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4312114969 type Work @default.
• W4312114969 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4312114969 countsByYear W43121149692023 @default.
• W4312114969 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4312114969 hasAuthorship W4312114969A5008934716 @default.
• W4312114969 hasAuthorship W4312114969A5046147795 @default.
• W4312114969 hasAuthorship W4312114969A5069626566 @default.
• W4312114969 hasAuthorship W4312114969A5077227000 @default.
• W4312114969 hasAuthorship W4312114969A5088202095 @default.
• W4312114969 hasAuthorship W4312114969A5091498231 @default.
• W4312114969 hasBestOaLocation W43121149692 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConcept C11105738 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConcept C2776204877 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConcept C2910402577 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConceptScore W4312114969C11105738 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConceptScore W4312114969C127413603 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConceptScore W4312114969C141071460 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConceptScore W4312114969C151730666 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConceptScore W4312114969C1862650 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConceptScore W4312114969C2776204877 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConceptScore W4312114969C2777267654 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConceptScore W4312114969C2778818304 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConceptScore W4312114969C2910402577 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConceptScore W4312114969C42475967 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConceptScore W4312114969C71924100 @default.
• W4312114969 hasConceptScore W4312114969C86803240 @default.

• next