Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4312156288> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 67 of
67
with 100 items per page.
- W4312156288 endingPage "S76" @default.
- W4312156288 startingPage "S76" @default.
- W4312156288 abstract "Introduction The constant evolution of high-priced hospital drugs with large uncertainties are increasingly challenging the sustainability of many healthcare reimbursement systems. Consequently, more attention is paid to exploring innovative payment and reimbursement models that may contribute to sustainable healthcare funding mechanisms yet still ensure timely patient access to health intervention. However, more insight is needed into the experiences of stakeholders involved in making payment and reimbursement arrangements as they may play an essential part in successfully implementing innovative reimbursement and payment models in the future. Methods Between May and July 2021, a survey was sent out to Dutch stakeholders directly or indirectly involved in payment and reimbursement agreements. The survey questioned the current use of and future preferences for reimbursement and payment models for high priced hospital drugs using Likert scales. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results Our inquiry shows that currently financial-based reimbursement models are applied most often, especially discounts due to their simplicity. In the future, outcome-based reimbursement models are preferred more, particularly pay-for-outcome. The main challenge for implementation is generating evidence in practice. Upfront payment is currently the most frequently applied payment model, according to the respondents, whereas delayed payment models are preferred to be applied more often. Particularly payment at outcome-achieved models are preferred but they can be administratively difficult to arrange. The respondents are moderately satisfied with the payment and reimbursing system in the Netherlands, arguing that especially transparency about the final agreement and mutual trust could be improved. Conclusions Despite the preference healthcare payers have for using outcome-based reimbursement models and delayed payment models, currently they are rarely applied. The insights from our survey can provide Dutch stakeholders with future direction when implementing innovative reimbursement and payment models. Attention should be paid to which barriers are currently perceived and how policy structures can facilitate implementation. Further research should focus on exploring which combinations of reimbursement and payment models are most likely to be successful in the Netherlands." @default.
- W4312156288 created "2023-01-04" @default.
- W4312156288 creator A5022725827 @default.
- W4312156288 creator A5026358497 @default.
- W4312156288 creator A5041722553 @default.
- W4312156288 creator A5074465511 @default.
- W4312156288 date "2022-12-01" @default.
- W4312156288 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W4312156288 title "PP111 Reimbursement And Payment Models: A Survey Of Stakeholders’ Current Experiences And Future Outlook Within The Dutch Policy Setting" @default.
- W4312156288 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462322002343" @default.
- W4312156288 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4312156288 type Work @default.
- W4312156288 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4312156288 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4312156288 hasAuthorship W4312156288A5022725827 @default.
- W4312156288 hasAuthorship W4312156288A5026358497 @default.
- W4312156288 hasAuthorship W4312156288A5041722553 @default.
- W4312156288 hasAuthorship W4312156288A5074465511 @default.
- W4312156288 hasBestOaLocation W43121562881 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConcept C145097563 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConcept C2779703844 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConcept C2780233690 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConcept C39896193 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConceptScore W4312156288C10138342 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConceptScore W4312156288C105795698 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConceptScore W4312156288C144133560 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConceptScore W4312156288C145097563 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConceptScore W4312156288C160735492 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConceptScore W4312156288C162118730 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConceptScore W4312156288C162324750 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConceptScore W4312156288C2779703844 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConceptScore W4312156288C2780233690 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConceptScore W4312156288C33923547 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConceptScore W4312156288C38652104 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConceptScore W4312156288C39896193 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConceptScore W4312156288C41008148 @default.
- W4312156288 hasConceptScore W4312156288C50522688 @default.
- W4312156288 hasIssue "S1" @default.
- W4312156288 hasLocation W43121562881 @default.
- W4312156288 hasOpenAccess W4312156288 @default.
- W4312156288 hasPrimaryLocation W43121562881 @default.
- W4312156288 hasRelatedWork W2099726527 @default.
- W4312156288 hasRelatedWork W2105001751 @default.
- W4312156288 hasRelatedWork W215892325 @default.
- W4312156288 hasRelatedWork W2166521090 @default.
- W4312156288 hasRelatedWork W2284427628 @default.
- W4312156288 hasRelatedWork W2291059624 @default.
- W4312156288 hasRelatedWork W2409942798 @default.
- W4312156288 hasRelatedWork W2887091436 @default.
- W4312156288 hasRelatedWork W3124174472 @default.
- W4312156288 hasRelatedWork W4220896693 @default.
- W4312156288 hasVolume "38" @default.
- W4312156288 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4312156288 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4312156288 workType "article" @default.