FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4312156946> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4312156946 endingPage "369" @default.
• W4312156946 startingPage "364" @default.
• W4312156946 abstract "Despite technical advancement, elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction is a challenging procedure due to the limitations regarding the challenging tunnel placement and potential injury to the ulnar nerve. Furthermore, current techniques for reconstruction and repair are inferior functionally and biomechanically when compared to native UCL tissue. A modified docking technique using a single-tunnel proximal suspensory fixation may reduce complications and potentially provide a technique for UCL reconstruction that is biomechanically superior. Decreasing the number of bone tunnels decreases the number of places that bone tear through could occur. The purpose was to evaluate and compare the biomechanical performances for 2 elbow UCL reconstruction techniques: (1) standard docking technique (SD) and (2) a proximal single tunnel (PST) technique using a suspensory fixation. We hypothesized that the PST technique would be biomechanically superior to the SD technique.Twelve matched pairs of cadaveric elbows were dissected and fixed at 70 degrees for biomechanical testing. Gracilis grafts were used for a docking reconstruction and the modified reconstruction with a PST suspensory fixation. A cyclic valgus torque protocol was used to precondition specimens for either reconstruction technique and the ulnohumeral gapping was then assessed. Following gapping measurements, postsurgical specimens underwent a valgus rotation applied at a rate of 5°/s until the anterior band of the UCL failed or fracture occurred. Ultimate load to failure, stiffness, and mode of failure were recorded.There were no statistical differences between the two groups. Mean rotational stiffness of the SD (2.3 ± 0.6 Nm/deg) compared to the PST (1.9 ± 0.7 Nm/deg) (P = .41) and mean ultimate failure torque of the SD (30.5 ± 9.2 Nm) compared to the PST (30.9 ± 8.6 Nm) (P = .86) were similar. There was also no statistically significant difference (P = .83) when comparing the native UCL ulnohumeral gapping (6.0 ± 2.0 mm) to the mean ulnohumeral gapping of the SD reconstruction (6.0 ± 1.8 mm).This study compares the biomechanical strength of elbow UCL reconstructions performed using the SP technique to that of a PST technique. Among all tested parameters, including ultimate failure torque, stiffness, and ulnohumeral gapping, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 techniques." @default.
• W4312156946 created "2023-01-04" @default.
• W4312156946 creator A5004076506 @default.
• W4312156946 creator A5008297890 @default.
• W4312156946 creator A5018136532 @default.
• W4312156946 creator A5019286054 @default.
• W4312156946 creator A5021510603 @default.
• W4312156946 creator A5034715220 @default.
• W4312156946 creator A5043375730 @default.
• W4312156946 creator A5073795888 @default.
• W4312156946 creator A5085609995 @default.
• W4312156946 creator A5088994384 @default.
• W4312156946 date "2023-03-01" @default.
• W4312156946 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4312156946 title "Biomechanical comparison of ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction with single-tunnel proximal suspensory fixation versus modified docking technique" @default.
• W4312156946 cites W1894504304 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W1908739859 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W1922761220 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W1929849824 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2004949161 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2011421828 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2054569839 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2072091646 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2078736653 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2090005925 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2090726495 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2091470788 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2113174343 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2140070794 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2141041002 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2149741010 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2168647011 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2205913768 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2208276687 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2229632662 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2233078610 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2253997415 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2324140197 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2402173573 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2520596127 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2553848174 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2741291700 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2797335551 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2799636939 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2802188637 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2897797179 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2961683579 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2962978653 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W2970120546 @default.
• W4312156946 cites W3049237773 @default.
• W4312156946 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.12.012" @default.
• W4312156946 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36911780" @default.
• W4312156946 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4312156946 type Work @default.
• W4312156946 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4312156946 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4312156946 hasAuthorship W4312156946A5004076506 @default.
• W4312156946 hasAuthorship W4312156946A5008297890 @default.
• W4312156946 hasAuthorship W4312156946A5018136532 @default.
• W4312156946 hasAuthorship W4312156946A5019286054 @default.
• W4312156946 hasAuthorship W4312156946A5021510603 @default.
• W4312156946 hasAuthorship W4312156946A5034715220 @default.
• W4312156946 hasAuthorship W4312156946A5043375730 @default.
• W4312156946 hasAuthorship W4312156946A5073795888 @default.
• W4312156946 hasAuthorship W4312156946A5085609995 @default.
• W4312156946 hasAuthorship W4312156946A5088994384 @default.
• W4312156946 hasBestOaLocation W43121569461 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConcept C170700871 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConcept C2776392104 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConcept C2781017183 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConcept C91762617 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConceptScore W4312156946C105702510 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConceptScore W4312156946C136229726 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConceptScore W4312156946C141071460 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConceptScore W4312156946C146249460 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConceptScore W4312156946C170700871 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConceptScore W4312156946C175696284 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConceptScore W4312156946C2776392104 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConceptScore W4312156946C2781017183 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConceptScore W4312156946C2781184374 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConceptScore W4312156946C2908647359 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConceptScore W4312156946C29694066 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConceptScore W4312156946C71924100 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConceptScore W4312156946C91762617 @default.
• W4312156946 hasConceptScore W4312156946C99454951 @default.
• W4312156946 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4312156946 hasLocation W43121569461 @default.
• W4312156946 hasLocation W43121569462 @default.

• next