FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4312499498> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4312499498 endingPage "434" @default.
• W4312499498 startingPage "429" @default.
• W4312499498 abstract "Introduction: Since the first laparoscopic-assisted colon resection was introduced in 1991 by Jacobs et al., it has gradually become popular. Increasingly more colorectal surgeons admit that the laparoscopic technique leads to quicker functional recovery and improved short-term results when compared with the open approach. However, the laparoscopic technique has not previously been proven to gain significant benefits in colorectal surgeries. Recently, oncologic outcomes of colorectal cancer resection, in terms of lymph node harvest number and excision safety margin lengths, achieved under laparoscopy could be comparable to those obtained using the conventional open technique. However, the curability of colorectal cancer under the laparoscopic technique remains controversial because of the uncertainty about the overall recurrence rate. Objective: To study the outcome of colorectal surgeries in our department in order to compare laparoscopic surgery (LS) versus open surgery (OS) of colorectal cancer procedures in terms of operations duration, blood loss, intra and post-operative complications. Methods: Review of all colorectal cancer patients who underwent open and laparoscopic procedures between January 2014 and January 2020. Excluding patients, those have non-malignant tumors. Included in data collection are the patients’ demographic information, type of surgery, diagnostic test, complications, operative time, and hospital admission period. We will take the information from files of patients and our documentations during clinic visits. Results: A total of 101 patients underwent colorectal cancer surgery at King Salman Armed Forces Hospital from 1/1/2014 till 1/1/2020. Of these, 63 were male (62.3%). Of these colon cancer 68 cases (67%). The mean age was 47.2 years. Comorbidities included diabetes 13 (12%), hypertension 10 (9.9%), IHD 16 (15%), ESRD 4 (3.9%). Of these 41 were smokers (40.5%). Mean Body Mass Index (BMI) was 31.2 kg/m2. Mean hospital stay 7 ± 2 days for OS and 5 ± 2 for LS. Fifty nine patients (58.4%) underwent OS. 7 cases (6.9%) of LR had conversion. Conclusion: LS of colorectal cancer has better short-term results than OS but longer operative time." @default.
• W4312499498 created "2023-01-05" @default.
• W4312499498 creator A5050156033 @default.
• W4312499498 creator A5051847242 @default.
• W4312499498 creator A5057831427 @default.
• W4312499498 creator A5070440431 @default.
• W4312499498 creator A5086092680 @default.
• W4312499498 date "2022-01-01" @default.
• W4312499498 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4312499498 title "Outcome of Laparoscopic versus Open Colorectal Cancer Surgery" @default.
• W4312499498 cites W1979169814 @default.
• W4312499498 cites W1981433546 @default.
• W4312499498 cites W1994675564 @default.
• W4312499498 cites W2033016420 @default.
• W4312499498 cites W2062627924 @default.
• W4312499498 cites W2067774586 @default.
• W4312499498 cites W2094296372 @default.
• W4312499498 cites W2110287688 @default.
• W4312499498 cites W2185791496 @default.
• W4312499498 doi "https://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2022.139051" @default.
• W4312499498 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4312499498 type Work @default.
• W4312499498 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4312499498 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4312499498 hasAuthorship W4312499498A5050156033 @default.
• W4312499498 hasAuthorship W4312499498A5051847242 @default.
• W4312499498 hasAuthorship W4312499498A5057831427 @default.
• W4312499498 hasAuthorship W4312499498A5070440431 @default.
• W4312499498 hasAuthorship W4312499498A5086092680 @default.
• W4312499498 hasBestOaLocation W43124994981 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConcept C2776111594 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConcept C2780849966 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConcept C3018900477 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConceptScore W4312499498C121608353 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConceptScore W4312499498C126322002 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConceptScore W4312499498C141071460 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConceptScore W4312499498C2776111594 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConceptScore W4312499498C2780047204 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConceptScore W4312499498C2780849966 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConceptScore W4312499498C3018900477 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConceptScore W4312499498C526805850 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConceptScore W4312499498C61434518 @default.
• W4312499498 hasConceptScore W4312499498C71924100 @default.
• W4312499498 hasIssue "09" @default.
• W4312499498 hasLocation W43124994981 @default.
• W4312499498 hasOpenAccess W4312499498 @default.
• W4312499498 hasPrimaryLocation W43124994981 @default.
• W4312499498 hasRelatedWork W1968328386 @default.
• W4312499498 hasRelatedWork W2018970378 @default.
• W4312499498 hasRelatedWork W2366278841 @default.
• W4312499498 hasRelatedWork W2369159867 @default.
• W4312499498 hasRelatedWork W2377190525 @default.
• W4312499498 hasRelatedWork W2379504747 @default.
• W4312499498 hasRelatedWork W2485776510 @default.
• W4312499498 hasRelatedWork W2740936504 @default.
• W4312499498 hasRelatedWork W2773050483 @default.
• W4312499498 hasRelatedWork W4283779772 @default.
• W4312499498 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W4312499498 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4312499498 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4312499498 workType "article" @default.