FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4312811353> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4312811353 endingPage "92" @default.
• W4312811353 startingPage "86" @default.
• W4312811353 abstract "Summary: The article determines the effectiveness of civil procedural regulation of certain court procedures in martial law and temporary occupation on the basis of scientific and practical analysis of the procedure for changing territorial jurisdiction due to the termination of the court hearing of case and the mechanism for resuming lost proceedings. These procedures will in many cases be used in combination and have become key to ensuring that citizens exercise their constitutional right on access to justice. The urgency of the application of these procedures today is due to the imposition of martial law, in connection with which the courts in some areas have stopped working. A description of the procedure for transferring the case to another court on this basis is given. An overview of the provisions of the Laws “On the Legal Regime of Martial Law” and “On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges”, which defines the mechanism for changing the territorial jurisdiction of cases considered by courts in the territory where martial law is imposed. It is considered a situation when the case materials in paper form cannot be transferred for objective reasons (the court that stopped working is in the temporarily occupied territory or the territory of hostilities, or the case materials were destroyed or lost during the transfer). It turns out that this does not preclude the transfer of the case as a procedure for changing jurisdiction, as the case is transferred as a relevant legal dispute or other legal issue on which civil proceedings have been initiated with a single unique number. It is argued the conclusion that the transfer of case under jurisdiction will be considered completed from the moment the new court accepts such a case for proceedings, and not from the moment of the decision to change jurisdiction. It is justified, if in connection with the change of jurisdiction the unfinished case was not transferred to another court and (or) was not accepted by the new court for proceedings to continue its consideration, then after the restoration of jurisdiction such case should be continued by the court whose work was resumed. It is noted that during transfer of the case under jurisdiction it may also be addressed the issue of resumption of lost proceedings in connection with the loss of case materials. It is emphasized that in contrast to the goal of restoring lost “completed” court proceedings, which pursues individual procedural goals, the goal of restoring lost yet unfinished court proceedings will be to provide a real opportunity to exercise all components of the constitutional right to justice, including access to justice and the whole set of procedural rights that arose to the parties of the case in connection with the filing of a lawsuit and the opening of proceedings in a case reviewed by a court whose territorial jurisdiction has changed. It is substantiated the feasibility of introducing a mechanism for resuming lost but still unfinished court proceedings in order to ensure the continuation of consideration of a previously initiated case by a new court. Key words: civil proceedings, court, civil case, jurisdiction, lost proceedings, martial law, temporary occupation" @default.
• W4312811353 created "2023-01-05" @default.
• W4312811353 creator A5063608255 @default.
• W4312811353 date "2022-10-01" @default.
• W4312811353 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4312811353 title "Efficiency of civil and procedural regulation of certain judicial procedures in connection with the martial law and temporary occupation" @default.
• W4312811353 doi "https://doi.org/10.33663/2524-017x-2022-13-13" @default.
• W4312811353 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4312811353 type Work @default.
• W4312811353 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4312811353 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4312811353 hasAuthorship W4312811353A5063608255 @default.
• W4312811353 hasBestOaLocation W43128113531 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConcept C170706310 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConcept C177986884 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConcept C2777452007 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConcept C2780677400 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConcept C538833194 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConceptScore W4312811353C170706310 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConceptScore W4312811353C17744445 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConceptScore W4312811353C177986884 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConceptScore W4312811353C199539241 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConceptScore W4312811353C2776949292 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConceptScore W4312811353C2777452007 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConceptScore W4312811353C2780677400 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConceptScore W4312811353C538833194 @default.
• W4312811353 hasConceptScore W4312811353C94625758 @default.
• W4312811353 hasIssue "13" @default.
• W4312811353 hasLocation W43128113531 @default.
• W4312811353 hasOpenAccess W4312811353 @default.
• W4312811353 hasPrimaryLocation W43128113531 @default.
• W4312811353 hasRelatedWork W1977646453 @default.
• W4312811353 hasRelatedWork W2134344897 @default.
• W4312811353 hasRelatedWork W2254758165 @default.
• W4312811353 hasRelatedWork W2376816510 @default.
• W4312811353 hasRelatedWork W2787824470 @default.
• W4312811353 hasRelatedWork W2884381740 @default.
• W4312811353 hasRelatedWork W3107223030 @default.
• W4312811353 hasRelatedWork W3201352030 @default.
• W4312811353 hasRelatedWork W4283268348 @default.
• W4312811353 hasRelatedWork W49453911 @default.
• W4312811353 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4312811353 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4312811353 workType "article" @default.