FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4312841057> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4312841057 abstract "In continuation of the judicial reform that has been taking place in Ukraine since 2014, the issue of introducing magistrates’ institutions stays relevant. Investigation of the history of the introduction and genesis of magistrates’ courts after the reform of 1864 in Ukrainian territory allow decisively saying “yes” to the institution of justices of the peace in Ukraine and improving the time-tested models of magistrate justice. The purpose of this study was to identify and generalise positive steps and conclusions from the mistakes of the past, including the need to unify the structure of magistrates’ courts, improve the mechanisms of their effective work and strengthen confidence in the judiciary to implement them in the modern legislative procedure. To fulfil this purpose, historical, historical-comparative, historical-system, comparative-legal research methods were used. The paper analysed the prerequisites, creation, and development of peace institutions on Ukrainian lands after the introduction of the reform of 1864. The structure of the newly formed world institutions and the category of cases under their jurisdiction were outlined. The features of the formation of the judicial corps of justices of the peace (features of appointment and dismissal, requirements for candidates, rights, duties, and responsibilities of justices of the peace) were clarified. Attention is focused on the impact that the world justice system experienced after the reform of 1864. The expected consequences of the work of peace institutions, positive results and real shortcomings of their activities were highlighted. The necessity of creating magistrates’ institutions in Ukraine is justified, since they will contribute to the further introduction of direct democracy, reduce the burden on courts of general jurisdiction, improve legal awareness of citizens and strengthen the effectiveness of judicial proceedings through the widespread introduction of the institution of reconciliation (mediation). It was noted that further legislative, administrative-organisational, and modern electronic support is needed for the issue of jurisdiction of the magistrates’ courts, selection, qualification, application of management methods, and a clear definition of the responsibility of judges. A partial solution to these issues was proposed. These results of this study can be used in the development of the Draft Law of Ukraine “On Magistrates’ Courts”." @default.
• W4312841057 created "2023-01-05" @default.
• W4312841057 creator A5030541936 @default.
• W4312841057 date "2022-01-01" @default.
• W4312841057 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4312841057 title "The Institution of Justices of the Peace Through the Lens of the Judicial Reform of 1864" @default.
• W4312841057 cites W2046315321 @default.
• W4312841057 cites W3000393946 @default.
• W4312841057 cites W3128067072 @default.
• W4312841057 cites W3132679495 @default.
• W4312841057 cites W3136579552 @default.
• W4312841057 cites W3149289111 @default.
• W4312841057 cites W4213260239 @default.
• W4312841057 cites W4312386760 @default.
• W4312841057 doi "https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2022-5-2-23-30" @default.
• W4312841057 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4312841057 type Work @default.
• W4312841057 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4312841057 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4312841057 hasAuthorship W4312841057A5030541936 @default.
• W4312841057 hasBestOaLocation W43128410571 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConcept C21931767 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConcept C2778063847 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConcept C2778145024 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConcept C2779583194 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConcept C2780510313 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConceptScore W4312841057C127413603 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConceptScore W4312841057C138885662 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConceptScore W4312841057C139621336 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConceptScore W4312841057C17744445 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConceptScore W4312841057C18762648 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConceptScore W4312841057C199539241 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConceptScore W4312841057C21931767 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConceptScore W4312841057C2776949292 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConceptScore W4312841057C2778063847 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConceptScore W4312841057C2778145024 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConceptScore W4312841057C2779583194 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConceptScore W4312841057C2780510313 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConceptScore W4312841057C3116431 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConceptScore W4312841057C41895202 @default.
• W4312841057 hasConceptScore W4312841057C78519656 @default.
• W4312841057 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4312841057 hasLocation W43128410571 @default.
• W4312841057 hasOpenAccess W4312841057 @default.
• W4312841057 hasPrimaryLocation W43128410571 @default.
• W4312841057 hasRelatedWork W1692402323 @default.
• W4312841057 hasRelatedWork W2049431570 @default.
• W4312841057 hasRelatedWork W2143148771 @default.
• W4312841057 hasRelatedWork W2351154152 @default.
• W4312841057 hasRelatedWork W2358868376 @default.
• W4312841057 hasRelatedWork W2501054313 @default.
• W4312841057 hasRelatedWork W2767500963 @default.
• W4312841057 hasRelatedWork W2916368571 @default.
• W4312841057 hasRelatedWork W2917992351 @default.
• W4312841057 hasRelatedWork W3177755069 @default.
• W4312841057 hasVolume "5" @default.
• W4312841057 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4312841057 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4312841057 workType "article" @default.