FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313210116> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4313210116 endingPage "140" @default.
• W4313210116 startingPage "1" @default.
• W4313210116 abstract "Background Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation decisions have been widely criticised. The Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) process was developed to facilitate shared decisions between patients and clinicians in relation to emergency treatments, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Objective To explore how, when and why ReSPECT plans are made and what effects the plans have on patient outcomes. Design A mixed-methods evaluation, comprising (1) a qualitative study of ReSPECT decision-making processes, (2) an interrupted time series examining process and survival outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest and (3) a retrospective observational study examining factors associated with ReSPECT recommendations and patient outcomes. Setting NHS acute hospitals and primary care and community services in England (2017–2020). Participants Hospital doctors, general practitioners, nurses, patients and families. Data sources The following sources were used: (1) observations of ReSPECT conversations at six hospitals and conversations with clinicians, patient, families and general practitioners, (2) survey and freedom of information data from hospitals participating in the National Cardiac Arrest Audit and (3) a review of inpatient medical records, ReSPECT forms and NHS Safety Thermometer data. Results By December 2019, the ReSPECT process was being used in 40 of 186 (22%) acute hospitals. In total, 792 of 3439 (23%) inpatients, usually those identified at risk of deterioration, had a ReSPECT form. Involvement of the patient and/or family was recorded on 513 of 706 (73%) ReSPECT forms reviewed. Clinicians said that lack of time prevented more conversations. Observed conversations focused on resuscitation, but also included other treatments and the patient’s values and preferences. Conversation types included open-ended conversations, with clinicians actively eliciting the patients’ wishes and preferences, a persuasive approach, swaying the conversation towards a decision aligned with medical opinion, and simply informing the patient/relative about a medical decision that had already been made. The frequency of harms reported on the NHS Safety Thermometer was similar among patients with or without a ReSPECT form. Hospital doctors and general practitioners gave different views on the purpose of the ReSPECT process and the type of recommendations they would record. Limitations The research was undertaken within the first 2 years following the implementation of ReSPECT. Local policies meant that doctors led these conversations. Most patients were seriously ill, which limited opportunities for interviews. Incomplete adoption of the ReSPECT process and problems associated with the NHS Safety Thermometer tool affected the evaluation on clinical outcomes. Conclusions Patients and families were involved in most ReSPECT conversations. Conversations focused on resuscitation, but also included other emergency treatments. Respect for patient autonomy and duty to protect from harm informed clinicians’ approach to varying degrees, depending on the clinical situation and their views of ReSPECT as a shared decision-making process. The complexity of these conversations and the clinical, emotional and organisational barriers observed suggest that a nuanced and multifaceted approach will be necessary to support good ReSPECT processes. Future work Further research is needed to understand the advantages and disadvantages to the adoption of a national emergency care and treatment plan system, the most effective national and local implementation approaches, and whether or not shared decision-making approaches in the context of emergency care and treatment plans could further enhance patient and family engagement. Study registration This study is registered as ISRCTN11112933. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research ; Vol. 10, No. 40. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information." @default.
• W4313210116 created "2023-01-06" @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5002166110 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5010336667 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5010398085 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5013095601 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5021333985 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5021617334 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5025327684 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5026911622 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5027760373 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5029977491 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5030562736 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5034230626 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5037266861 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5046150733 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5050958004 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5059870439 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5063352888 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5065910712 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5076853909 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5083394058 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5089550458 @default.
• W4313210116 creator A5091369661 @default.
• W4313210116 date "2022-12-01" @default.
• W4313210116 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4313210116 title "Recommended summary plan for emergency care and treatment: ReSPECT a mixed-methods study" @default.
• W4313210116 cites W1530888396 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W1970663200 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W1977313155 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W1988427393 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W1995891857 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2000445173 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2012143077 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2034685926 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2035980393 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2035987436 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2044003032 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2069811848 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2070065956 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2070139134 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2076750321 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2079815087 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2089383499 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2090665020 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2093613917 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2095240855 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2103726863 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2107968267 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2108121898 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2113354881 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2113862172 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2114914691 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2117515855 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2127845357 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2134842875 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2137623631 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2138211313 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2139699892 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2154050409 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2161945862 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2165091848 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2165357274 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2170519763 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2295728812 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2331705907 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2405655405 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2471877895 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2594630979 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2767867182 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2775406568 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2801677840 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2885917915 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2899075422 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2936336997 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2939043544 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2945231007 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2946470836 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2991606160 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W2998834742 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W3001962923 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W3024224135 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W3025331847 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W3045005105 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W3070445843 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W3117909644 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W3121475895 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W3190639902 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W4220981661 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W4255300425 @default.
• W4313210116 cites W4283799314 @default.
• W4313210116 doi "https://doi.org/10.3310/lfpe3627" @default.
• W4313210116 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4313210116 type Work @default.
• W4313210116 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4313210116 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4313210116 hasAuthorship W4313210116A5002166110 @default.

• next