Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313225519> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 77 of
77
with 100 items per page.
- W4313225519 endingPage "55" @default.
- W4313225519 startingPage "53" @default.
- W4313225519 abstract "Background: Patients use online physician ratings to select an orthopaedic surgeon. The objectives of this paper were to investigate whether ratings are concordant among online review sites rating orthopaedic surgeons and examine physician practice characteristics associated with higher physician ratings. Methods: Orthopaedic surgeons in Illinois who accepted Medicare patients in 2015 were included in this study. Physician practice characteristics, demographics, and information regarding their Medicare volume were obtained for each surgeon. Information regarding each surgeon’s average and number of ratings was collected from Yelp, Healthgrades, Google, and Vitals.com. The authors examined concordance between sites by investigating how many physicians were given high ratings on one site (>4/5), but low ratings on another site (<2 .5/5). Finally, a multivariable regression model was developed to investigate the association between physician characteristics and online ratings. Results: Two hundred ninety-five orthopaedic surgeons were included in the study sample. The number of reviews per physician varied greatly, with some surgeons having as high as 300 and many having no reviews. Of the physicians reviewed as low-performing on one site, 65.9% were rated as high-performing on another site. Physicians were more likely to have better ratings if they graduated after 1995 (P<0.05) or performed a higher volume of Medicare services (P<0.05). Total number of reviews had a statistically significant positive correlation with average rating (r=0.26, P<0.001). Conclusions: The discordance among review sites for orthopaedic surgeons suggests that patients should exercise caution when using online reviews. As their use increases, the healthcare community should take a closer look at standardizing reviews. Level of Evidence: Level III" @default.
- W4313225519 created "2023-01-06" @default.
- W4313225519 creator A5040297741 @default.
- W4313225519 creator A5075304786 @default.
- W4313225519 date "2022-11-15" @default.
- W4313225519 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W4313225519 title "Discordance in online commercial ratings of orthopaedic surgeons: a retrospective review of online rating scores" @default.
- W4313225519 cites W1975505844 @default.
- W4313225519 cites W2081307860 @default.
- W4313225519 cites W2146540122 @default.
- W4313225519 cites W2160817070 @default.
- W4313225519 cites W2226872032 @default.
- W4313225519 cites W2315671882 @default.
- W4313225519 cites W2562065761 @default.
- W4313225519 cites W2567958018 @default.
- W4313225519 cites W2762564373 @default.
- W4313225519 cites W2785126133 @default.
- W4313225519 cites W2794688099 @default.
- W4313225519 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/bco.0000000000001190" @default.
- W4313225519 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4313225519 type Work @default.
- W4313225519 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4313225519 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4313225519 hasAuthorship W4313225519A5040297741 @default.
- W4313225519 hasAuthorship W4313225519A5075304786 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConcept C134560507 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConcept C160798450 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConcept C2780084366 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConcept C2988118254 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConceptScore W4313225519C126322002 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConceptScore W4313225519C134560507 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConceptScore W4313225519C141071460 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConceptScore W4313225519C144024400 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConceptScore W4313225519C149923435 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConceptScore W4313225519C160798450 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConceptScore W4313225519C162324750 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConceptScore W4313225519C17744445 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConceptScore W4313225519C1862650 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConceptScore W4313225519C199539241 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConceptScore W4313225519C2779473830 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConceptScore W4313225519C2780084366 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConceptScore W4313225519C2988118254 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConceptScore W4313225519C512399662 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConceptScore W4313225519C68312169 @default.
- W4313225519 hasConceptScore W4313225519C71924100 @default.
- W4313225519 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W4313225519 hasLocation W43132255191 @default.
- W4313225519 hasOpenAccess W4313225519 @default.
- W4313225519 hasPrimaryLocation W43132255191 @default.
- W4313225519 hasRelatedWork W2003523823 @default.
- W4313225519 hasRelatedWork W2010452176 @default.
- W4313225519 hasRelatedWork W2089006872 @default.
- W4313225519 hasRelatedWork W2094085418 @default.
- W4313225519 hasRelatedWork W2143598137 @default.
- W4313225519 hasRelatedWork W214433981 @default.
- W4313225519 hasRelatedWork W4206422284 @default.
- W4313225519 hasRelatedWork W4311068385 @default.
- W4313225519 hasRelatedWork W4322728551 @default.
- W4313225519 hasRelatedWork W4322729359 @default.
- W4313225519 hasVolume "34" @default.
- W4313225519 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4313225519 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4313225519 workType "article" @default.