Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313236639> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4313236639 endingPage "120" @default.
- W4313236639 startingPage "120" @default.
- W4313236639 abstract "Importance Laparoscopic gastrectomy is rapidly being adopted worldwide as an alternative to open gastrectomy to treat gastric cancer. However, laparoscopic gastrectomy might be more expensive as a result of longer operating times and more expensive surgical materials. To date, the cost-effectiveness of both procedures has not been prospectively evaluated in a randomized clinical trial. Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic compared with open gastrectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants In this multicenter randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing total or distal gastrectomy in 10 Dutch tertiary referral centers, cost-effectiveness data were collected alongside a multicenter randomized clinical trial on laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy for resectable gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-4aN0-3bM0). A modified societal perspective and 1-year time horizon were used. Costs were calculated on the individual patient level by using hospital registry data and medical consumption and productivity loss questionnaires. The unit costs of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy were calculated bottom-up. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated with the EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire, in which a value of 0 indicates death and 1 indicates perfect health. Missing questionnaire data were imputed with multiple imputation. Bootstrapping was performed to estimate the uncertainty surrounding the cost-effectiveness. The study was conducted from March 17, 2015, to August 20, 2018. Data analyses were performed between September 1, 2020, and November 17, 2021. Interventions Laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures Evaluations in this cost-effectiveness analysis included total costs and QALYs. Results Between 2015 and 2018, 227 patients were included. Mean (SD) age was 67.5 (11.7) years, and 140 were male (61.7%). Unit costs for initial surgery were calculated to be €8124 (US $8087) for laparoscopic total gastrectomy, €7353 (US $7320) for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, €6584 (US $6554) for open total gastrectomy, and €5893 (US $5866) for open distal gastrectomy. Mean total costs after 1-year follow-up were €26 084 (US $25 965) in the laparoscopic group and €25 332 (US $25 216) in the open group (difference, €752 [US $749; 3.0%]). Mean (SD) QALY contributions during 1 year were 0.665 (0.298) in the laparoscopic group and 0.686 (0.288) in the open group (difference, −0.021). Bootstrapping showed that these differences between treatment groups were relatively small compared with the uncertainty of the analysis. Conclusions and Relevance Although the laparoscopic gastrectomy itself was more expensive, after 1-year follow-up, results suggest that differences in both total costs and effectiveness were limited between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy. These results support centers’ choosing, based on their own preference, whether to (de)implement laparoscopic gastrectomy as an alternative to open gastrectomy." @default.
- W4313236639 created "2023-01-06" @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5006089129 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5007311016 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5007361135 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5010065978 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5012050627 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5022594489 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5023539341 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5029194915 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5029196683 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5032096648 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5046588150 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5052145533 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5053269718 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5056059665 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5057147534 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5060616254 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5064280092 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5068617987 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5070469723 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5070922178 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5077774354 @default.
- W4313236639 creator A5091660968 @default.
- W4313236639 date "2023-02-01" @default.
- W4313236639 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
- W4313236639 title "Cost-effectiveness of Laparoscopic vs Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer" @default.
- W4313236639 cites W1817451959 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W1982200091 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W1990166011 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2007195218 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2007370115 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2039969544 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2051468376 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2065946578 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2069633955 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2167571044 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2334353679 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2528857721 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2586797882 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2587074836 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2612587561 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2736849407 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2904732182 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2921101885 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2938774982 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W2947509101 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W3047594669 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W3120877185 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W3121332653 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W3165594099 @default.
- W4313236639 cites W4243550142 @default.
- W4313236639 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6337" @default.
- W4313236639 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36576822" @default.
- W4313236639 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4313236639 type Work @default.
- W4313236639 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W4313236639 countsByYear W43132366392023 @default.
- W4313236639 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5006089129 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5007311016 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5007361135 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5010065978 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5012050627 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5022594489 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5023539341 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5029194915 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5029196683 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5032096648 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5046588150 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5052145533 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5053269718 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5056059665 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5057147534 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5060616254 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5064280092 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5068617987 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5070469723 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5070922178 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5077774354 @default.
- W4313236639 hasAuthorship W4313236639A5091660968 @default.
- W4313236639 hasBestOaLocation W43132366392 @default.
- W4313236639 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
- W4313236639 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W4313236639 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4313236639 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W4313236639 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W4313236639 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
- W4313236639 hasConcept C2780470880 @default.
- W4313236639 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
- W4313236639 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
- W4313236639 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
- W4313236639 hasConcept C64332521 @default.
- W4313236639 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4313236639 hasConceptScore W4313236639C112930515 @default.
- W4313236639 hasConceptScore W4313236639C121608353 @default.
- W4313236639 hasConceptScore W4313236639C126322002 @default.
- W4313236639 hasConceptScore W4313236639C141071460 @default.