FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313237010> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4313237010 endingPage "4377" @default.
• W4313237010 startingPage "4367" @default.
• W4313237010 abstract "To compare four previously published methods for rectal tumor response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy on MRI. Twenty-two radiologists (5 rectal MRI experts, 17 general/abdominal radiologists) retrospectively reviewed the post-chemoradiotherapy MRIs of 90 patients, scanned at 10 centers (with non-standardized protocols). They applied four response methods; two based on T2W-MRI only (MRI tumor regression grade (mrTRG); split-scar sign), and two based on T2W-MRI+DWI (modified-mrTRG; DWI-patterns). Image quality was graded using a 0–6-point score (including slice thickness and in-plane resolution; sequence angulation; DWI b-values, signal-to-noise, and artefacts); scores < 4 were classified below average. Mixed model linear regression was used to calculate average sensitivity/specificity/accuracy to predict a complete response (versus residual tumor) and assess the impact of reader experience and image quality. Group interobserver agreement (IOA) was calculated using Krippendorff’s alpha. Readers were asked to indicate their preferred scoring method(s). Average sensitivity/specificity/accuracy was 57%/64%/62% (mrTRG), 36%/79%/66% (split-scar), 40%/79%/67% (modified-mrTRG), and 37%/82%/68% (DWI-patterns); mrTRG showed higher sensitivity but lower specificity and accuracy (p < 0.001) compared to the other methods. IOA was lower for the split scar method (0.18 vs. 0.39–0.43). Higher reader experience had a significant positive effect on diagnostic performance and IOA (except for the split scar sign); below-average imaging quality had a significant negative effect on diagnostic performance. DWI pattern was selected as the preferred method by 73% of readers. Methods incorporating DWI showed the most favorable results when combining diagnostic performance, IOA, and reader preference. Reader experience and image quality clearly impacted diagnostic performance emphasizing the need for state-of-the-art imaging and dedicated radiologist training. • In a multireader study comparing 4 MRI methods for rectal tumor response evaluation, those incorporating DWI showed the best results when combining diagnostic performance, IOA, and reader preference. • The most preferred method (by 73% of readers) was the “DWI patterns” approach with an accuracy of 68%, high specificity of 82%, and group IOA of 0.43. • Reader experience level and MRI quality had an evident effect on diagnostic performance and IOA." @default.
• W4313237010 created "2023-01-06" @default.
• W4313237010 creator A5005226197 @default.
• W4313237010 creator A5020071712 @default.
• W4313237010 creator A5026388653 @default.
• W4313237010 creator A5028105973 @default.
• W4313237010 creator A5040025434 @default.
• W4313237010 creator A5042395430 @default.
• W4313237010 creator A5055560086 @default.
• W4313237010 creator A5064985555 @default.
• W4313237010 creator A5083240185 @default.
• W4313237010 creator A5085740912 @default.
• W4313237010 date "2022-12-28" @default.
• W4313237010 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W4313237010 title "Comparison of MRI response evaluation methods in rectal cancer: a multicentre and multireader validation study" @default.
• W4313237010 cites W1764231357 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W1977468182 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2014274213 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2050167685 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2053154970 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2061504941 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2097734786 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2149221817 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2165131707 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2171123209 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2250745056 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2462214508 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2512215200 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2760816909 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2776332562 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2790499524 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2809278331 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2900615077 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2921248694 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2966492900 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W2998918992 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W3008394279 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W3011062394 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W3018760686 @default.
• W4313237010 cites W3155524248 @default.
• W4313237010 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09342-w" @default.
• W4313237010 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36576549" @default.
• W4313237010 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4313237010 type Work @default.
• W4313237010 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W4313237010 countsByYear W43132370102023 @default.
• W4313237010 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4313237010 hasAuthorship W4313237010A5005226197 @default.
• W4313237010 hasAuthorship W4313237010A5020071712 @default.
• W4313237010 hasAuthorship W4313237010A5026388653 @default.
• W4313237010 hasAuthorship W4313237010A5028105973 @default.
• W4313237010 hasAuthorship W4313237010A5040025434 @default.
• W4313237010 hasAuthorship W4313237010A5042395430 @default.
• W4313237010 hasAuthorship W4313237010A5055560086 @default.
• W4313237010 hasAuthorship W4313237010A5064985555 @default.
• W4313237010 hasAuthorship W4313237010A5083240185 @default.
• W4313237010 hasAuthorship W4313237010A5085740912 @default.
• W4313237010 hasBestOaLocation W43132370102 @default.
• W4313237010 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4313237010 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W4313237010 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W4313237010 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W4313237010 hasConcept C16568411 @default.
• W4313237010 hasConcept C2779889316 @default.
• W4313237010 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W4313237010 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4313237010 hasConceptScore W4313237010C118552586 @default.
• W4313237010 hasConceptScore W4313237010C126838900 @default.
• W4313237010 hasConceptScore W4313237010C143409427 @default.
• W4313237010 hasConceptScore W4313237010C143753070 @default.
• W4313237010 hasConceptScore W4313237010C16568411 @default.
• W4313237010 hasConceptScore W4313237010C2779889316 @default.
• W4313237010 hasConceptScore W4313237010C2989005 @default.
• W4313237010 hasConceptScore W4313237010C71924100 @default.
• W4313237010 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W4313237010 hasLocation W43132370101 @default.
• W4313237010 hasLocation W43132370102 @default.
• W4313237010 hasLocation W43132370103 @default.
• W4313237010 hasLocation W43132370104 @default.
• W4313237010 hasOpenAccess W4313237010 @default.
• W4313237010 hasPrimaryLocation W43132370101 @default.
• W4313237010 hasRelatedWork W2007715178 @default.
• W4313237010 hasRelatedWork W2008737768 @default.
• W4313237010 hasRelatedWork W2039649766 @default.
• W4313237010 hasRelatedWork W2096150699 @default.
• W4313237010 hasRelatedWork W2158469081 @default.
• W4313237010 hasRelatedWork W2793433761 @default.
• W4313237010 hasRelatedWork W2798310738 @default.
• W4313237010 hasRelatedWork W3170934895 @default.
• W4313237010 hasRelatedWork W4306849910 @default.
• W4313237010 hasRelatedWork W48426095 @default.
• W4313237010 hasVolume "33" @default.
• W4313237010 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4313237010 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4313237010 workType "article" @default.