Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313302457> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 75 of
75
with 100 items per page.
- W4313302457 endingPage "551" @default.
- W4313302457 startingPage "551" @default.
- W4313302457 abstract "Aim: To compare the cutting efficiency, cyclic fatigue, corrosion resistance, and autoclave cycle effects of ProTaper Gold, TruNatomy, and WaveOne Gold file systems. Materials and Methods: Thirty mesiobuccal roots of extracted maxillary first molars were randomly divided into three groups (10 specimens each) for testing cutting efficiency: Groups A, B, and C: ProTaper Gold, TruNatomy-Prime, and WaveOne Gold-Primary, respectively. Root canal instrumentation was carried out in each root accordingly. Specimens’ weights were measured and micro-computed tomography was used to scan the samples before and after root canal preparation. For cyclic-fatigue, corrosion-resistance, and autoclave-cycle-effects testing, 30 files were allocated into three groups at random, Groups A, B, and C: ProTaper Gold-F2, TruNatomy-Prime, and WaveOne Gold-Primary (10 specimens each). For cyclic-fatigue testing, the instruments were firmly held in a stainless steel block with an artificial canal without pressure. The time (s) was calculated until fracture. For the corrosion-resistance test, SEM surface-topographical analysis was carried out in response to 5.25% NaOCl, 2% CHX, and 17% EDTA. For evaluation of autoclave cycle effects, SEM surface-topographical analysis was carried out for 1, 5, and 10 autoclave cycles. Data were analyzed statistically using one-way analysis of variance followed by multiple comparisons with Bonferroni’s test at P<0.05. Results: TruNatomy was the most resistant to cyclic fatigue and ProTaper Gold the least. WaveOne Gold removed significantly more dentin and had the least corrosion resistance and highest autoclave cycle effects. Conclusion: TruNatomy can be considered as a better file system compared with WaveOne Gold and has comparable efficiency with that of ProTaper Gold." @default.
- W4313302457 created "2023-01-06" @default.
- W4313302457 creator A5033516410 @default.
- W4313302457 creator A5058783738 @default.
- W4313302457 date "2022-01-01" @default.
- W4313302457 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W4313302457 title "Comparative evaluation of cutting efficiency, cyclic fatigue, corrosion resistance, and autoclave cycle effects of three different file systems: An in-vitro micro-CT and metallurgy analysis" @default.
- W4313302457 cites W2070627662 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W2074819264 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W2163757813 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W2298666251 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W2469563453 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W2777531654 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W2787408667 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W2805737994 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W2914316222 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W2928879622 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W2944269748 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W2976772006 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W2996873447 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W3004849037 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W3008621217 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W3014468260 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W3022220806 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W3036946042 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W3129001917 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W3138046291 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W3144851616 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W3205509201 @default.
- W4313302457 cites W2965213655 @default.
- W4313302457 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/jioh.jioh_91_22" @default.
- W4313302457 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4313302457 type Work @default.
- W4313302457 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4313302457 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4313302457 hasAuthorship W4313302457A5033516410 @default.
- W4313302457 hasAuthorship W4313302457A5058783738 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConcept C20625102 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConcept C2779747767 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConcept C43088074 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConcept C61039299 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConceptScore W4313302457C191897082 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConceptScore W4313302457C192562407 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConceptScore W4313302457C199343813 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConceptScore W4313302457C202271784 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConceptScore W4313302457C20625102 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConceptScore W4313302457C2779747767 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConceptScore W4313302457C43088074 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConceptScore W4313302457C61039299 @default.
- W4313302457 hasConceptScore W4313302457C71924100 @default.
- W4313302457 hasIssue "6" @default.
- W4313302457 hasLocation W43133024571 @default.
- W4313302457 hasOpenAccess W4313302457 @default.
- W4313302457 hasPrimaryLocation W43133024571 @default.
- W4313302457 hasRelatedWork W1120284227 @default.
- W4313302457 hasRelatedWork W2047794115 @default.
- W4313302457 hasRelatedWork W2059234480 @default.
- W4313302457 hasRelatedWork W2347990307 @default.
- W4313302457 hasRelatedWork W2371380409 @default.
- W4313302457 hasRelatedWork W2384995831 @default.
- W4313302457 hasRelatedWork W2393263245 @default.
- W4313302457 hasRelatedWork W2393614059 @default.
- W4313302457 hasRelatedWork W3031113233 @default.
- W4313302457 hasRelatedWork W3097783663 @default.
- W4313302457 hasVolume "14" @default.
- W4313302457 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4313302457 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4313302457 workType "article" @default.