FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313306420> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4313306420 endingPage "e0279808" @default.
• W4313306420 startingPage "e0279808" @default.
• W4313306420 abstract "Background The United States health care sector is one of the largest polluting industries, which has significant adverse effects on human health. Medical device reprocessing (MDR) is a sustainability solution that has the potential to decrease hospital waste, cut carbon emissions, reduce spending, and improve supply chain resiliency; however, only a small proportion of FDA-approved devices are actually reprocessed. Thus, we conducted a qualitative study to understand barriers and facilitators of scaling up MDR. Methods and findings We conducted in-depth interviews with 17 stakeholders (exceeding thematic saturation) at a large academic health system in New England and national MDR organizations. We also collected observations through site visits at the health system. We recruited participants from June 2021 to April 2022 through purposive sampling. Using an analytic approach guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we applied inductive and deductive codes related to key implementation constructs. We then conducted a thematic analysis and identified five overarching themes related to barriers and facilitators of MDR. First, respondents explained that regulatory bodies and original equipment manufacturers determine which devices can be reprocessed. For example, some respondents described that original equipment manufacturers use tactics of forced obsolescence that prevent their devices from being reprocessed. Second, respondents explained that MDR has variable compatibility with hospital priorities; for example, the potential cost savings of MDR is compatible with their priorities, while the perception of decreased functionality of reprocessed medical devices is incompatible. Third, respondents described that physician preferences influence which reprocessed devices get ordered. Fourth, respondents explained that variable staff knowledge and beliefs about MDR influence their motivations to select and collect reprocessable devices. Lastly, respondents emphasized that there was a lack of infrastructure for evaluating and maintaining MDR programs within their health system. Conclusions Based on our findings, we have outlined a number of recommendations that target these barriers and facilitators so that the environmental and financial benefits of MDR can be realized at this health system and nationally. For example, implementing federal policies that prevent original equipment manufacturers from using tactics of forced obsolescence can facilitate the scale-up of MDR nationally. Additionally, providing life cycle assessments that compare the environmental effects of single-use disposable, reprocessable disposable, and reusable devices could facilitate health systems’ purchasing decisions. Creating and disseminating audit and feedback reports to hospital staff might also facilitate their continued engagement in the program. Lastly, hiring a full-time program manager that leads MDR programs within health systems could improve program sustainability." @default.
• W4313306420 created "2023-01-06" @default.
• W4313306420 creator A5029647197 @default.
• W4313306420 creator A5043235525 @default.
• W4313306420 creator A5067702970 @default.
• W4313306420 date "2022-12-30" @default.
• W4313306420 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4313306420 title "Stakeholder perspectives on scaling up medical device reprocessing: A qualitative study" @default.
• W4313306420 cites W1968261191 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W2020155291 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W2068303762 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W2085028749 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W2105501846 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W2129660502 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W2138664283 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W2398003476 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W2417491767 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W2480519764 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W2766230600 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W2936403767 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W2987568643 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W3111129731 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W3113201814 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W3126645058 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W3137471091 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W3178381409 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W4241870873 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W4243196202 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W4253307816 @default.
• W4313306420 cites W4361865413 @default.
• W4313306420 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279808" @default.
• W4313306420 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36584081" @default.
• W4313306420 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4313306420 type Work @default.
• W4313306420 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4313306420 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4313306420 hasAuthorship W4313306420A5029647197 @default.
• W4313306420 hasAuthorship W4313306420A5043235525 @default.
• W4313306420 hasAuthorship W4313306420A5067702970 @default.
• W4313306420 hasBestOaLocation W43133064201 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C100363876 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C201305675 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C30795975 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C74196892 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C100363876 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C127413603 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C144024400 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C144133560 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C159110408 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C160735492 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C162853370 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C17744445 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C190248442 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C199539241 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C201305675 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C21547014 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C2908647359 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C30795975 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C36289849 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C39549134 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C71924100 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C74196892 @default.
• W4313306420 hasConceptScore W4313306420C99454951 @default.
• W4313306420 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W4313306420 hasLocation W43133064201 @default.
• W4313306420 hasLocation W43133064202 @default.
• W4313306420 hasLocation W43133064203 @default.
• W4313306420 hasOpenAccess W4313306420 @default.
• W4313306420 hasPrimaryLocation W43133064201 @default.
• W4313306420 hasRelatedWork W1982702875 @default.
• W4313306420 hasRelatedWork W2766730175 @default.
• W4313306420 hasRelatedWork W2886771484 @default.
• W4313306420 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4313306420 hasRelatedWork W2909132643 @default.
• W4313306420 hasRelatedWork W2966336311 @default.
• W4313306420 hasRelatedWork W3034139276 @default.
• W4313306420 hasRelatedWork W3215048339 @default.
• W4313306420 hasRelatedWork W4289518665 @default.
• W4313306420 hasRelatedWork W4386127129 @default.
• W4313306420 hasVolume "17" @default.
• W4313306420 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4313306420 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next