FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313307020> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4313307020 endingPage "557" @default.
• W4313307020 startingPage "531" @default.
• W4313307020 abstract "The fact that the absolute is only God, and therefore, God is the first to come to mind when perfection is mentioned, is a common occurrence among believers. Perfectionism was also associated with God by the early personality theorists, moved away from its religious meaning over time, and its relationship with piety was little taken into account until recently. The fact that perfectionism, which has a religious motif in its essence, came to life in the field of religious sciences in general and psychology of religion in particular, in other words, bringing the concept of religious perfectionism into the literature became possible by a limited number of measurement attempts made after 2010. In this study, religious perfectionism, which is based on setting high standards for religious life, was discussed as a whole with order, discipline, inadequacy of one's self, perfect religious expectations and generalizations about others. Our study aims to fill the gap in the relevant literature by making the operational definition of religious perfectionism and measuring it. After determining the need for scale development and literature review, multidimensional perfectionism scales were reviewed and an item pool was created. Some features of perfectionism, such as discipline, generalization, and performance control, which are not dimensioned in multidimensional scales, were also adapted to piety. Previously developed religious perfectionism scales were also examined and, unlike them, we attempted to emphasize both the individual's religious life and the perfect God perception. The opinions of five experts in the field of Psychology of Religion were consulted about the adequacy of the items, so the first form of the scale was prepared for the pilot scheme. The study group consists of 610 Muslim participants who live in Turkey, believe in Allah (God), and regularly perform at least one worship. A total of 254 people, 192 (75.6%) of whom were female and 62 (24.4%) were male, participated in the pilot scheme. A total of 356 participants, 242 (68%) of whom were women and 114 (32%) were men, participated in the main study. The participants' educational background was undergraduate or postgraduate, and most were between the ages of 18-30. In order to determine the validity of the scale, construct validity and criterion-related validity were examined. Explanatory Factor Analysis (n=254) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (n=356) were used for construct validity and correlation analysis was performed for criterion-related validity. In addition, the differences between the item mean scores of the lower 27% and upper 27% groups were tested with the unrelated T-test for item discrimination. The reliability of the scale was determined by Cronbach's Alpha (a) and test-retest methods. As a result of Explanatory Factor Analysis, the scale was divided into two factors as Positive Religious perfectionism and Negative Religious perfectionism, as designed. The positive dimension of the scale included items that included the very high standards that the person set about God and his religious life, the order and discipline shown in worship. In the negative dimension of the scale, items such as finding the worship inadequate, doubting the actions, and worrying about making mistakes, as well as the general acceptances that the individual has about himself, God, or others, were included. The total score of the dimensions showed the general religious perfectionism level, and as the score gets higher, so does the religious perfectionism level. The scale can be used to measure the general religious perfectionism level based on the total score in the studies to be carried out. It can also be used by dividing it into its positive and negative factors. The internal consistency coefficient of Positive Religious perfectionism was 0.913; it was 0.876 for Negative Religious perfectionism, and the overall reliability for the 22-item structure of the scale was 0.904. As a result of the test-retest performed with a new study group of 95 people with an interval of 14 days, a significant positive correlation was found between the pretest and retest levels (r=0.960 p&lt;0.01). In addition, it was determined that the participants' lower 27% and upper 27% values were significant for all items (p&lt;0.01). As a result of the correlation analysis for criterion-related validity, significant positive relationships were found between religious perfectionism and perfectionism, and intrinsic religious motivation. Finally, the values obtained as a result of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis performed to confirm the factor structure were found to be in the range of acceptable (X2/df=3,306; RMSEA=0,079; GFI=0,92; AGFI=0,90; RMR=0,068; SRMR=0,052) and perfect fit criteria (CFI=0,96; NNFI=0,96; NFI=0,96). All these findings revealed that the scale was a valid and reliable measurement tool that measures religious perfectionism." @default.
• W4313307020 created "2023-01-06" @default.
• W4313307020 creator A5034728312 @default.
• W4313307020 creator A5037386441 @default.
• W4313307020 date "2022-12-30" @default.
• W4313307020 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W4313307020 title "Mükemmeliyetçi Dindarlık Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi ve Geçerliği-Türkçe Versiyon (MDÖ-T)" @default.
• W4313307020 cites W1964653764 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W1969358189 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W1980210769 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W1980761772 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W1981782934 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W1982706919 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W1983161292 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W1991073166 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W1994156738 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2022549610 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2026578463 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2039399590 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2068879080 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2069563297 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2088501617 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2108833122 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2114641024 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2138492108 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2157029742 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2162577283 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2165636910 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2335623894 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2407112597 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2487180385 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2610647060 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2731029129 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2763888519 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2790462630 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2790656687 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2793676433 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W2915774972 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W4239426612 @default.
• W4313307020 cites W89427840 @default.
• W4313307020 doi "https://doi.org/10.33420/marife.1187500" @default.
• W4313307020 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4313307020 type Work @default.
• W4313307020 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4313307020 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4313307020 hasAuthorship W4313307020A5034728312 @default.
• W4313307020 hasAuthorship W4313307020A5037386441 @default.
• W4313307020 hasBestOaLocation W43133070201 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConcept C187288502 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConcept C24667770 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConcept C2777278965 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConcept C2778897741 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConceptScore W4313307020C111472728 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConceptScore W4313307020C138885662 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConceptScore W4313307020C15744967 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConceptScore W4313307020C169760540 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConceptScore W4313307020C187288502 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConceptScore W4313307020C24667770 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConceptScore W4313307020C26760741 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConceptScore W4313307020C2777278965 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConceptScore W4313307020C2778897741 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConceptScore W4313307020C2780876879 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConceptScore W4313307020C542102704 @default.
• W4313307020 hasConceptScore W4313307020C77805123 @default.
• W4313307020 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4313307020 hasLocation W43133070201 @default.
• W4313307020 hasLocation W43133070202 @default.
• W4313307020 hasOpenAccess W4313307020 @default.
• W4313307020 hasPrimaryLocation W43133070201 @default.
• W4313307020 hasRelatedWork W1482144426 @default.
• W4313307020 hasRelatedWork W2027998085 @default.
• W4313307020 hasRelatedWork W2035593921 @default.
• W4313307020 hasRelatedWork W2125547112 @default.
• W4313307020 hasRelatedWork W2147023152 @default.
• W4313307020 hasRelatedWork W2265138510 @default.
• W4313307020 hasRelatedWork W2293633609 @default.
• W4313307020 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4313307020 hasRelatedWork W2888081776 @default.
• W4313307020 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4313307020 hasVolume "22" @default.
• W4313307020 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4313307020 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4313307020 workType "article" @default.