Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313335762> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4313335762 endingPage "e43496" @default.
- W4313335762 startingPage "e43496" @default.
- W4313335762 abstract "Background In 2022, NHS England announced plans to ensure that all adult primary care patients in England would have full online access to new data added to their general practitioner (GP) record. However, this plan has not yet been fully implemented. Since April 2020, the GP contract in England has already committed to offering patients full online record access on a prospective basis and on request. However, there has been limited research into UK GPs’ experiences and opinions about this practice innovation. Objective This study aimed to explore the experiences and opinions of GPs in England about patients’ access to their full web-based health record, including clinicians’ free-text summaries of the consultation (so-called “open notes”). Methods In March 2022, using a convenience sample, we administered a web-based mixed methods survey of 400 GPs in the United Kingdom to explore their experiences and opinions about the impact on patients and GPs’ practices to offer patients full online access to their health records. Participants were recruited using the clinician marketing service Doctors.net.uk from registered GPs currently working in England. We conducted a qualitative descriptive analysis of written responses (“comments”) to 4 open-ended questions embedded in a web-based questionnaire. Results Of 400 GPs, 224 (56%) left comments that were classified into 4 major themes: increased strain on GP practices, the potential to harm patients, changes to documentation, and legal concerns. GPs believed that patient access would lead to extra work for them, reduced efficiency, and increased burnout. The participants also believed that access would increase patient anxiety and incur risks to patient safety. Experienced and perceived documentation changes included reduced candor and changes to record functionality. Anticipated legal concerns encompassed fears about increased litigation risks and lack of legal guidance to GPs about how to manage documentation that would be read by patients and potential third parties. Conclusions This study provides timely information on the views of GPs in England regarding patient access to their web-based health records. Overwhelmingly, GPs were skeptical about the benefits of access both for patients and to their practices. These views are similar to those expressed by clinicians in other countries, including Nordic countries and the United States before patient access. The survey was limited by the convenience sample, and it is not possible to infer that our sample was representative of the opinions of GPs in England. More extensive, qualitative research is required to understand the perspectives of patients in England after experiencing access to their web-based records. Finally, further research is needed to explore objective measures of the impact of patient access to their records on health outcomes, clinician workload, and changes to documentation." @default.
- W4313335762 created "2023-01-06" @default.
- W4313335762 creator A5014961366 @default.
- W4313335762 creator A5016273925 @default.
- W4313335762 creator A5018598333 @default.
- W4313335762 creator A5026523515 @default.
- W4313335762 creator A5028480620 @default.
- W4313335762 creator A5035055692 @default.
- W4313335762 creator A5046065519 @default.
- W4313335762 creator A5073104393 @default.
- W4313335762 creator A5077293023 @default.
- W4313335762 creator A5080445565 @default.
- W4313335762 date "2023-02-22" @default.
- W4313335762 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
- W4313335762 title "Patient Online Record Access in English Primary Care: Qualitative Survey Study of General Practitioners’ Views" @default.
- W4313335762 cites W1633821885 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W1651501403 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2068374682 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2107153681 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2124711085 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2125922179 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2142429234 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2159165123 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2466711751 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2506671495 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2712348717 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2768247694 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2783249319 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2786453996 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2803239485 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2883935706 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2892051168 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2905136983 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2905546739 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2915829155 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2924179259 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2926000164 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2943089688 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2978379478 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W2980376762 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3006030435 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3013574799 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3034019787 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3035598667 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3036312389 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3091977803 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3108933173 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3120375169 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3130214970 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3138663326 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3139283676 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3154751177 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3162190284 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3172831167 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3205513304 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3207433446 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W3210534365 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W4210328247 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W4210454256 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W4225091890 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W4226366900 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W4281486469 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W4281490262 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W4281568227 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W4285719527 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W4288066108 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W4309670038 @default.
- W4313335762 cites W4310705925 @default.
- W4313335762 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/43496" @default.
- W4313335762 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36811939" @default.
- W4313335762 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4313335762 type Work @default.
- W4313335762 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W4313335762 countsByYear W43133357622023 @default.
- W4313335762 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4313335762 hasAuthorship W4313335762A5014961366 @default.
- W4313335762 hasAuthorship W4313335762A5016273925 @default.
- W4313335762 hasAuthorship W4313335762A5018598333 @default.
- W4313335762 hasAuthorship W4313335762A5026523515 @default.
- W4313335762 hasAuthorship W4313335762A5028480620 @default.
- W4313335762 hasAuthorship W4313335762A5035055692 @default.
- W4313335762 hasAuthorship W4313335762A5046065519 @default.
- W4313335762 hasAuthorship W4313335762A5073104393 @default.
- W4313335762 hasAuthorship W4313335762A5077293023 @default.
- W4313335762 hasAuthorship W4313335762A5080445565 @default.
- W4313335762 hasBestOaLocation W43133357621 @default.
- W4313335762 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W4313335762 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W4313335762 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
- W4313335762 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
- W4313335762 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
- W4313335762 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4313335762 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W4313335762 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W4313335762 hasConcept C56666940 @default.
- W4313335762 hasConcept C60229501 @default.
- W4313335762 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4313335762 hasConcept C76155785 @default.