FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313346053> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4313346053 endingPage "188" @default.
• W4313346053 startingPage "180" @default.
• W4313346053 abstract "Background: Intellectual Property (IP) management is a fundamental element in putting intellectual property to work for the public good. This study aimed at assessing the perception of the research community on intellectual Property Management (IPM) capacity in universities of health and allied sciences, and health research institutions in Tanzania. Methods: A total of 148 respondents which included scientists, researchers and postgraduate students from 18 institutions in Tanzania returned the filled in self-administered online questionnaire (59.4% response rate). Results: Most respondents (76.5%) were of the view that social and economic development are the priorities of their institutions but not intellectual property (IP) commercialisation as only a few (18%) reported that their institutions have arrangement with local industries and 22% said that their institutions have functioning intellectual Property Management Office (IPMO). About 30% of the respondents reported that IP policies exist in their institutions. In most cases, respondents were of the view that the need for effective management of IP (86.7%) triggered the institution’s decision to have IP policy. Among the respondents who stated that their institutions have IP policy, slightly over one third to a half acknowledged that their institutions’ IP policies intend to regulate mechanisms for benefit sharing and IP ownership. Among those who reported that their institutions had IP policies, only 12.8% indicated that the policies were being implemented. Majority of respondents (80.4%) knew the existence of employment contracts but, only 28.4% signed the contract and 12.8% were well informed that they had been employed to invent. Over 20% of respondents said that their institutions had the capacity to exploit and manage IP and only a quarter of respondents reported to have capacity for IP management. Less than 40% of respondents admitted that their institutions had entrepreneurship capacity and 30% affirmed that their institutions were capable of establishing IPMO. Conclusion: Opinions of the respondents indicate that universities and health research institutions in Tanzania have inadequate capacity for IPM due to inadequate or lack of frameworks, mechanisms, structures and resources for protection of generated IP. Technical and financial support are needed to strengthen capacity for IPM in universities and health research institutions in Tanzania." @default.
• W4313346053 created "2023-01-06" @default.
• W4313346053 creator A5052949326 @default.
• W4313346053 date "2022-12-15" @default.
• W4313346053 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4313346053 title "Intellectual Property Management Capacity in Tanzania: Perception of Researchers in Academia and Research Institutions of Health and Allied Sciences" @default.
• W4313346053 doi "https://doi.org/10.24248/eahrj.v6i2.697" @default.
• W4313346053 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36751679" @default.
• W4313346053 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4313346053 type Work @default.
• W4313346053 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4313346053 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4313346053 hasAuthorship W4313346053A5052949326 @default.
• W4313346053 hasBestOaLocation W43133460531 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConcept C200288055 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConcept C2779357621 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConcept C2780510313 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConcept C34974158 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConcept C45355965 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConceptScore W4313346053C127413603 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConceptScore W4313346053C144133560 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConceptScore W4313346053C162324750 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConceptScore W4313346053C17744445 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConceptScore W4313346053C18762648 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConceptScore W4313346053C199539241 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConceptScore W4313346053C200288055 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConceptScore W4313346053C2779357621 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConceptScore W4313346053C2780510313 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConceptScore W4313346053C34974158 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConceptScore W4313346053C39549134 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConceptScore W4313346053C45355965 @default.
• W4313346053 hasConceptScore W4313346053C78519656 @default.
• W4313346053 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4313346053 hasLocation W43133460531 @default.
• W4313346053 hasLocation W43133460532 @default.
• W4313346053 hasLocation W43133460533 @default.
• W4313346053 hasOpenAccess W4313346053 @default.
• W4313346053 hasPrimaryLocation W43133460531 @default.
• W4313346053 hasRelatedWork W1945206430 @default.
• W4313346053 hasRelatedWork W2125791409 @default.
• W4313346053 hasRelatedWork W2358679595 @default.
• W4313346053 hasRelatedWork W2362052023 @default.
• W4313346053 hasRelatedWork W2376046878 @default.
• W4313346053 hasRelatedWork W2382428016 @default.
• W4313346053 hasRelatedWork W2730022312 @default.
• W4313346053 hasRelatedWork W4312421364 @default.
• W4313346053 hasRelatedWork W4312605604 @default.
• W4313346053 hasRelatedWork W600993083 @default.
• W4313346053 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W4313346053 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4313346053 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4313346053 workType "article" @default.