Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313363527> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 65 of
65
with 100 items per page.
- W4313363527 endingPage "215" @default.
- W4313363527 startingPage "215" @default.
- W4313363527 abstract "At the heart of this paper are judges and their obligations to ensure that conflicts over fragmented rights are cured, that fundamental rights are stewarded, and that justice prevails. There are several respected legal theories that have never been examined together before, but when three of them are placed in a nexus of constitutional law, we find that these ideas support broad powers for courts to control the distribution and allocation of rights, enabling the resolution of conflicts at many social levels. First, a succession of scholars has identified the risks of ‘fragmenting rights’, of allocating overlapping rights to too many parties. The danger presented is that those rights-holders may lose the use of their legal rights or privileges; this outcome is known as the ‘Tragedy of the Anticommons’. Too many rights held by too many parties, a ‘fragmentation of rights’, can lead to a lack of access to rights and a lack of access to justice. Second, the legal theories of Nobel Laureate Ronald Coase, who found that initial allocations of rights across a community might have been allocated in a manner that frustrates negotiations and other means to avoid conflicts; but judges have an opportunity and an obligation to reset those allocations of rights to better enable society toflourish. Third, Yale constitutional scholar Robert Cover wrote that judges can and should terminate claims of overlapping rights so that the litigious parties, and society at large, can return to a more harmonious co-existence. Cover wrote that this methodology of ‘jurispathic’ judges was both an ethical and a robust means of solving Dworkin’s ‘hard cases’. This paper investigates the nexus of these three jurisprudences and what the impact of their nexus is for constitutional scholars. This paper delivers original theoretical legal findings and provides functional approaches to best enable the resolution of conflicts before courts and the maintenance of rights and privileges for all parties. This paper documents an argument that courts, especially constitutional courts, have more power to solve social conflicts and other conflicts arising from legal rules and culturesthan many constitutional law scholars may have previously assumed feasible." @default.
- W4313363527 created "2023-01-06" @default.
- W4313363527 creator A5044035505 @default.
- W4313363527 date "2022-12-30" @default.
- W4313363527 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W4313363527 title "Creating Rights, Terminating Rights, Overcoming Legal Conflicts" @default.
- W4313363527 doi "https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev822" @default.
- W4313363527 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4313363527 type Work @default.
- W4313363527 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W4313363527 countsByYear W43133635272023 @default.
- W4313363527 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4313363527 hasAuthorship W4313363527A5044035505 @default.
- W4313363527 hasBestOaLocation W43133635271 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConcept C22299250 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConcept C27357055 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConcept C2778447849 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConcept C36566018 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConcept C79202496 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConcept C95691615 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConcept C98965940 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConceptScore W4313363527C139621336 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConceptScore W4313363527C144024400 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConceptScore W4313363527C162324750 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConceptScore W4313363527C169437150 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConceptScore W4313363527C175444787 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConceptScore W4313363527C17744445 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConceptScore W4313363527C190253527 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConceptScore W4313363527C199539241 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConceptScore W4313363527C22299250 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConceptScore W4313363527C27357055 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConceptScore W4313363527C2778447849 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConceptScore W4313363527C36566018 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConceptScore W4313363527C79202496 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConceptScore W4313363527C95691615 @default.
- W4313363527 hasConceptScore W4313363527C98965940 @default.
- W4313363527 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W4313363527 hasLocation W43133635271 @default.
- W4313363527 hasLocation W43133635272 @default.
- W4313363527 hasOpenAccess W4313363527 @default.
- W4313363527 hasPrimaryLocation W43133635271 @default.
- W4313363527 hasRelatedWork W2369537143 @default.
- W4313363527 hasRelatedWork W2384580052 @default.
- W4313363527 hasRelatedWork W3117274530 @default.
- W4313363527 hasRelatedWork W3121164103 @default.
- W4313363527 hasRelatedWork W3147943421 @default.
- W4313363527 hasRelatedWork W3205532016 @default.
- W4313363527 hasRelatedWork W4225854375 @default.
- W4313363527 hasRelatedWork W4383104595 @default.
- W4313363527 hasRelatedWork W622702766 @default.
- W4313363527 hasRelatedWork W2905962635 @default.
- W4313363527 hasVolume "8" @default.
- W4313363527 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4313363527 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4313363527 workType "article" @default.