Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313378613> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4313378613 endingPage "e071966" @default.
- W4313378613 startingPage "e071966" @default.
- W4313378613 abstract "Abstract Objective To determine the efficacy and safety of awake prone positioning versus usual care in non-intubated adults with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to covid-19. Design Systematic review with frequentist and bayesian meta-analyses. Study eligibility Randomized trials comparing awake prone positioning versus usual care in adults with covid-19 related hypoxemic respiratory failure. Information sources were Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 4 March 2022. Data extraction and synthesis Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Random effects meta-analyses were performed for the primary and secondary outcomes. Bayesian meta-analyses were performed for endotracheal intubation and mortality outcomes. GRADE certainty of evidence was assessed for outcomes. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was endotracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes were mortality, ventilator-free days, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, escalation of oxygen modality, change in oxygenation and respiratory rate, and adverse events. Results 17 trials (2931 patients) met the eligibility criteria. 12 trials were at low risk of bias, three had some concerns, and two were at high risk. Awake prone positioning reduced the risk of endotracheal intubation compared with usual care (crude average 24.2% v 29.8%, relative risk 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.73 to 0.94; high certainty). This translates to 55 fewer intubations per 1000 patients (95% confidence interval 87 to 19 fewer intubations). Awake prone positioning did not significantly affect secondary outcomes, including mortality (15.6% v 17.2%, relative risk 0.90, 0.76 to 1.07; high certainty), ventilator-free days (mean difference 0.97 days, 95% confidence interval −0.5 to 3.4; low certainty), ICU length of stay (−2.1 days, −4.5 to 0.4; low certainty), hospital length of stay (−0.09 days, −0.69 to 0.51; moderate certainty), and escalation of oxygen modality (21.4% v 23.0%, relative risk 1.04, 0.74 to 1.44; low certainty). Adverse events related to awake prone positioning were uncommon. Bayesian meta-analysis showed a high probability of benefit with awake prone positioning for endotracheal intubation (non-informative prior, mean relative risk 0.83, 95% credible interval 0.70 to 0.97; posterior probability for relative risk <0.95=96%) but lower probability for mortality (0.90, 0.73 to 1.13; <0.95=68%). Conclusions Awake prone positioning compared with usual care reduces the risk of endotracheal intubation in adults with hypoxemic respiratory failure due to covid-19 but probably has little to no effect on mortality or other outcomes. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42022314856." @default.
- W4313378613 created "2023-01-06" @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5008220062 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5012744558 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5019000744 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5020157030 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5021195825 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5021200051 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5039476533 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5043292385 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5045762489 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5048091736 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5049402910 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5063521931 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5066508335 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5071333786 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5076099839 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5076208728 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5077428434 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5079201163 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5084752934 @default.
- W4313378613 creator A5087369553 @default.
- W4313378613 date "2022-12-07" @default.
- W4313378613 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W4313378613 title "Efficacy of awake prone positioning in patients with covid-19 related hypoxemic respiratory failure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials" @default.
- W4313378613 cites W1857542727 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W1987609279 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W2089785792 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W2093043874 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W2106923828 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W2157823046 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W2165010366 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W2170892587 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W2593363470 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W2736912844 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W2766327047 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W2885675882 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W2985332844 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3001897055 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3004318991 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3008028633 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3049076699 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3080199550 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3115608267 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3117227254 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3123893780 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3128057618 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3131505812 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3132646146 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3135277573 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3136205089 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3157469179 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3161997411 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3184686845 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W3207204826 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W4220724255 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W4220930964 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W4224125394 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W4226026007 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W4226317263 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W4280613900 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W4280644695 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W4285719527 @default.
- W4313378613 cites W4287338625 @default.
- W4313378613 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-071966" @default.
- W4313378613 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36740866" @default.
- W4313378613 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4313378613 type Work @default.
- W4313378613 citedByCount "13" @default.
- W4313378613 countsByYear W43133786132022 @default.
- W4313378613 countsByYear W43133786132023 @default.
- W4313378613 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5008220062 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5012744558 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5019000744 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5020157030 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5021195825 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5021200051 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5039476533 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5043292385 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5045762489 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5048091736 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5049402910 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5063521931 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5066508335 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5071333786 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5076099839 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5076208728 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5077428434 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5079201163 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5084752934 @default.
- W4313378613 hasAuthorship W4313378613A5087369553 @default.
- W4313378613 hasBestOaLocation W43133786131 @default.
- W4313378613 hasConcept C121117317 @default.
- W4313378613 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4313378613 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W4313378613 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
- W4313378613 hasConcept C194828623 @default.