FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313407711> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4313407711 abstract "<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Various populations with chronic conditions are at risk for decreased cognitive performance, making assessment of their cognition important. Formal mobile cognitive assessments measure cognitive performance with greater ecological validity than traditional laboratory-based testing but add to participant task demands. Given that responding to a survey is considered a cognitively demanding task itself, information that is passively collected as a by-product of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) may be a means through which people’s cognitive performance in their natural environment can be estimated when formal ambulatory cognitive assessment is not feasible. We specifically examined whether the item response times (RTs) to EMA questions (eg, mood) can serve as approximations of cognitive processing speed. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aims to investigate whether the RTs from noncognitive EMA surveys can serve as approximate indicators of between-person (BP) differences and momentary within-person (WP) variability in cognitive processing speed. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> Data from a 2-week EMA study investigating the relationships among glucose, emotion, and functioning in adults with type 1 diabetes were analyzed. Validated mobile cognitive tests assessing processing speed (Symbol Search task) and sustained attention (Go-No Go task) were administered together with noncognitive EMA surveys 5 to 6 times per day via smartphones. Multilevel modeling was used to examine the reliability of EMA RTs, their convergent validity with the Symbol Search task, and their divergent validity with the Go-No Go task. Other tests of the validity of EMA RTs included the examination of their associations with age, depression, fatigue, and the time of day. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> Overall, in BP analyses, evidence was found supporting the reliability and convergent validity of EMA question RTs from even a single repeatedly administered EMA item as a measure of average processing speed. BP correlations between the Symbol Search task and EMA RTs ranged from 0.43 to 0.58 (<i>P</i>&lt;.001). EMA RTs had significant BP associations with age (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), as expected, but not with depression (<i>P=.</i>20) or average fatigue (<i>P=.</i>18). In WP analyses, the RTs to 16 slider items and all 22 EMA items (including the 16 slider items) had acceptable (&gt;0.70) WP reliability. After correcting for unreliability in multilevel models, EMA RTs from most combinations of items showed moderate WP correlations with the Symbol Search task (ranged from 0.29 to 0.58; <i>P</i>&lt;.001) and demonstrated theoretically expected relationships with momentary fatigue and the time of day. The associations between EMA RTs and the Symbol Search task were greater than those between EMA RTs and the Go-No Go task at both the BP and WP levels, providing evidence of divergent validity. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Assessing the RTs to EMA items (eg, mood) may be a method of approximating people’s average levels of and momentary fluctuations in processing speed without adding tasks beyond the survey questions. </sec> <sec> <title>CLINICALTRIAL</title> <p /> </sec>" @default.
• W4313407711 created "2023-01-06" @default.
• W4313407711 creator A5011189768 @default.
• W4313407711 creator A5017663878 @default.
• W4313407711 creator A5031364762 @default.
• W4313407711 creator A5033740861 @default.
• W4313407711 creator A5057253599 @default.
• W4313407711 creator A5075462047 @default.
• W4313407711 creator A5078285214 @default.
• W4313407711 creator A5082334643 @default.
• W4313407711 creator A5088949935 @default.
• W4313407711 date "2022-12-20" @default.
• W4313407711 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W4313407711 title "Reliability and Validity of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Response Times as an Indicator of Cognitive Processing Speed in People’s Natural Environment: An Intensive Longitudinal Study (Preprint)" @default.
• W4313407711 cites W1973932152 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W1975291371 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W1990722975 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W1994552563 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2005101532 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2017999297 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2030054443 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2048533792 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2055274380 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2063205682 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2093220018 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2093274439 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2095629702 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2096482701 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2097809511 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2098298040 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2098342740 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2134302857 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2140291289 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2143358459 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2150469545 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2161879067 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2230094283 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2313179268 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2338364226 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2463525950 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2510607691 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2738071819 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2769827535 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2790302258 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2793036539 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2809702501 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2912030424 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2966966909 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2967156870 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2980926060 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W2998531522 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W3037449445 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W3117357215 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W3122388946 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W3193295904 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W3200875151 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W4220668195 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W4231773558 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W4281487902 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W4283396163 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W4299627282 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W4311674930 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W4376542622 @default.
• W4313407711 cites W3173212007 @default.
• W4313407711 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.45203" @default.
• W4313407711 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4313407711 type Work @default.
• W4313407711 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4313407711 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4313407711 hasAuthorship W4313407711A5011189768 @default.
• W4313407711 hasAuthorship W4313407711A5017663878 @default.
• W4313407711 hasAuthorship W4313407711A5031364762 @default.
• W4313407711 hasAuthorship W4313407711A5033740861 @default.
• W4313407711 hasAuthorship W4313407711A5057253599 @default.
• W4313407711 hasAuthorship W4313407711A5075462047 @default.
• W4313407711 hasAuthorship W4313407711A5078285214 @default.
• W4313407711 hasAuthorship W4313407711A5082334643 @default.
• W4313407711 hasAuthorship W4313407711A5088949935 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C119653847 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C121244757 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C185711340 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C190210774 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C201995342 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C2780733359 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C3018868096 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C70364389 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4313407711 hasConceptScore W4313407711C119653847 @default.

• next