FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313431421> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4313431421 abstract "<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Virtual care was rapidly integrated into pediatric health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. While virtual care offers many benefits, it is necessary to better understand the experiences of those who receive, deliver, and coordinate virtual care in order to support sustainable, high-quality, and patient-centered health care. To date, methods implemented to evaluate users’ experiences of virtual care have been highly variable, making comparison and data synthesis difficult. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aims to describe evaluation strategies currently used to understand personal experiences with pediatric virtual care in Canada. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> In this mixed methods environmental scan, we first distributed a web-based questionnaire to clinical, research, and operational leaders delivering and evaluating pediatric virtual care in Canada. The questionnaire collected information about how experiences with virtual care have been or are currently being evaluated and whether these evaluations included the perspectives of children or youth, families, providers, or support staff. Second, respondents were asked to share the questions they used in their evaluations, and a content analysis was performed to identify common question categories. Third, we conducted semistructured interviews to further explore our respondents’ evaluation experiences across 4 domains—evaluation approaches, distribution methods, response rates, and lessons learned—and interest in a core set of questions for future evaluations. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> There were 72 respondents to the web-based questionnaire; among those who had conducted an evaluation, we identified 15 unique evaluations, and 14 of those provided a copy of the tools used to evaluate virtual care. These evaluations measured the virtual care experiences of parents or caregivers (n=15, 100%), children or youth (n=11, 73%), health care providers (n=11, 73%), and support staff (n=4, 27%). The most common data collection method used was electronic questionnaires distributed by email. Two respondents used validated tools; the remainder modified existing tools or developed new tools. Content analysis of the 14 submitted questionnaires revealed that the most common questions were about overall participant satisfaction, the comparison of virtual care to in-person care, and whether participants would choose virtual care options in the future. Interview findings indicate respondents frequently relied on methods used by peers and that a standardized, core set of questions to evaluate experiences with virtual care would be helpful to improve evaluation practices and support pediatric health care delivery. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> At our institution and elsewhere in Canada, experiences with pediatric virtual care have been evaluated using a variety of methods. A more consistent evaluation approach using standardized tools may enable more regular comparisons of experiences with virtual care and the synthesis of findings across health care settings. In turn, this may better inform our approach to virtual care, improve its integration into health systems, and facilitate sustainable, high-quality, patient-centered care. </sec>" @default.
• W4313431421 created "2023-01-06" @default.
• W4313431421 creator A5016004463 @default.
• W4313431421 creator A5021469009 @default.
• W4313431421 creator A5037059640 @default.
• W4313431421 creator A5047125397 @default.
• W4313431421 creator A5053814629 @default.
• W4313431421 creator A5059934947 @default.
• W4313431421 date "2022-12-23" @default.
• W4313431421 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W4313431421 title "Evaluation Strategies for Understanding Experiences with Virtual Care: Environmental Scan (Preprint)" @default.
• W4313431421 cites W1557671281 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W1924618820 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W2071044421 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W2072037675 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W2161424516 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W2217768243 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W2464964112 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W2601556514 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W2944434778 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W3068859699 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W3093065407 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W3126501536 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W3136595486 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W3138170804 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W3173198735 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W4200405421 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W4210677082 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W4229000851 @default.
• W4313431421 cites W4290462886 @default.
• W4313431421 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.45287" @default.
• W4313431421 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4313431421 type Work @default.
• W4313431421 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4313431421 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4313431421 hasAuthorship W4313431421A5016004463 @default.
• W4313431421 hasAuthorship W4313431421A5021469009 @default.
• W4313431421 hasAuthorship W4313431421A5037059640 @default.
• W4313431421 hasAuthorship W4313431421A5047125397 @default.
• W4313431421 hasAuthorship W4313431421A5053814629 @default.
• W4313431421 hasAuthorship W4313431421A5059934947 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConcept C43169469 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConceptScore W4313431421C111472728 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConceptScore W4313431421C136764020 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConceptScore W4313431421C138885662 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConceptScore W4313431421C15744967 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConceptScore W4313431421C159110408 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConceptScore W4313431421C160735492 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConceptScore W4313431421C177264268 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConceptScore W4313431421C17744445 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConceptScore W4313431421C199360897 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConceptScore W4313431421C199539241 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConceptScore W4313431421C2779530757 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConceptScore W4313431421C41008148 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConceptScore W4313431421C43169469 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConceptScore W4313431421C509550671 @default.
• W4313431421 hasConceptScore W4313431421C71924100 @default.
• W4313431421 hasLocation W43134314211 @default.
• W4313431421 hasOpenAccess W4313431421 @default.
• W4313431421 hasPrimaryLocation W43134314211 @default.
• W4313431421 hasRelatedWork W2063908860 @default.
• W4313431421 hasRelatedWork W2069116042 @default.
• W4313431421 hasRelatedWork W2102338924 @default.
• W4313431421 hasRelatedWork W2160833621 @default.
• W4313431421 hasRelatedWork W2389687086 @default.
• W4313431421 hasRelatedWork W2725851296 @default.
• W4313431421 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4313431421 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4313431421 hasRelatedWork W4225756839 @default.
• W4313431421 hasRelatedWork W4386465493 @default.
• W4313431421 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4313431421 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4313431421 workType "article" @default.