FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313446899> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4313446899 endingPage "101" @default.
• W4313446899 startingPage "87" @default.
• W4313446899 abstract "I analyze the oeuvre of contemporary Japanese photographer Rinko Kawauchi through the notion of imperfection. An approach that gives precedence to process over product and combines conceptual art with vernacular traditions makes her pictures happily imperfect. Departing from Kawauchi’s transmedial concept of the image, often lying between word and image and mainly materialized through photo books, I propose that Kawauchi’s photographs are imperfectthanks to her experimentation with technical mistakes, the vernacular subject-matter of everyday snapshots, seriality, sequencing, and format variation, elliptical visibility, the aesthetics of color, and a non-linear temporality. Imperfection emphasizes the materiality of the medium, and positions photography far removed from the referent-centered documentary domain by way of aisthethic, rather than semiotic, significance. Imperfection also activates reception as it kindles emotional involvement and participant viewing. The question remains: What is perfect then? ”Imperfect” compared to what kind of standards? Are there such? My article proposes a notion of “imperfect” defined against a received norm of technical mistakes, the vernacular subject-matter of everyday snapshots, seriality, sequencing, and format variation, elliptical visibility, the aesthetics of color, and a non-linear temporality. The text is not centered on perfection, yet the term appears defined against boundaries, temporal culmination or the single individual shot configured a la Cartier-Bresson. My entire essay pivots around the imperfection concept. I believe the reader is eventually convinced that the concept works very well - if not perfectly! for reading Kawauchi’s work. What is a mistake after all? For sure some of them are mistakes, if we have standards based on photography technique guides. But fine art photography has seldom followed these rules. My text progressively unpacks the notion of “mistake”. At this point (abstract), the text seeks to present ideas and call upon a common usage of terms to communicate with readers easily. Complications come in the development. As you also remarked, “mistake” will later appear in my text between quotation marks. Do these really make the pictures imperfect, like this sentence suggests? Is it really imperfection that activates reception? Or is it perhaps intimate/limited viewpoint and restrictions of the frame and camera technique?" @default.
• W4313446899 created "2023-01-06" @default.
• W4313446899 creator A5002366521 @default.
• W4313446899 date "2022-01-01" @default.
• W4313446899 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W4313446899 title "Rinko Kawauchi: Imperfect Photographs" @default.
• W4313446899 doi "https://doi.org/10.51427/com.jcs.2022.0017" @default.
• W4313446899 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4313446899 type Work @default.
• W4313446899 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4313446899 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4313446899 hasAuthorship W4313446899A5002366521 @default.
• W4313446899 hasBestOaLocation W43134468991 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConcept C119657128 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConcept C123307717 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConcept C141679102 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConcept C2777096784 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConcept C2777179996 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConcept C2780310539 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConcept C2780386941 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConceptScore W4313446899C107038049 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConceptScore W4313446899C111472728 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConceptScore W4313446899C119657128 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConceptScore W4313446899C123307717 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConceptScore W4313446899C124952713 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConceptScore W4313446899C138885662 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConceptScore W4313446899C141679102 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConceptScore W4313446899C142362112 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConceptScore W4313446899C153349607 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConceptScore W4313446899C17744445 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConceptScore W4313446899C199539241 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConceptScore W4313446899C2777096784 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConceptScore W4313446899C2777179996 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConceptScore W4313446899C2780310539 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConceptScore W4313446899C2780386941 @default.
• W4313446899 hasConceptScore W4313446899C41895202 @default.
• W4313446899 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4313446899 hasLocation W43134468991 @default.
• W4313446899 hasLocation W43134468992 @default.
• W4313446899 hasLocation W43134468993 @default.
• W4313446899 hasLocation W43134468994 @default.
• W4313446899 hasOpenAccess W4313446899 @default.
• W4313446899 hasPrimaryLocation W43134468991 @default.
• W4313446899 hasRelatedWork W1990600944 @default.
• W4313446899 hasRelatedWork W2980367130 @default.
• W4313446899 hasRelatedWork W3003432125 @default.
• W4313446899 hasRelatedWork W3209856229 @default.
• W4313446899 hasRelatedWork W4253576829 @default.
• W4313446899 hasRelatedWork W4293558177 @default.
• W4313446899 hasRelatedWork W4313446899 @default.
• W4313446899 hasRelatedWork W4321783450 @default.
• W4313446899 hasRelatedWork W2279484096 @default.
• W4313446899 hasRelatedWork W2982638749 @default.
• W4313446899 hasVolume "1" @default.
• W4313446899 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4313446899 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4313446899 workType "article" @default.