FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313561560> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4313561560 endingPage "1206" @default.
• W4313561560 startingPage "1196" @default.
• W4313561560 abstract "Injuries of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon are a prevalent source of anterior shoulder pain and are commonly treated with tenodesis. Not only a stable fixation of the LHB but also anatomic restoration of the length-tension relationship plays a central role in providing satisfactory functional and cosmetic outcomes, especially in young patients. We report the clinical outcomes of 2 different subpectoral tenodesis techniques using unicortical button fixation.Patients aged ≤ 50 years who were treated between April 2015 and January 2020 with 1 of the 2 following subpectoral tenodesis techniques were retrospectively selected and enrolled to undergo a follow-up examination at least 2 years after surgery: subpectoral in situ tenodesis followed by resection of the intra-articular portion leaving a residual tendon stump in the bicipital groove (group I) vs. tenotomy followed by resection of the stump and subpectoral tenodesis (group II). Patients who underwent concomitant rotator cuff repair, subsequent shoulder surgery, or contralateral biceps surgery were excluded. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the LHB score and the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), as well as measurements of isometric elbow flexion and forearm supination strength. Sonographic evaluation included assessment of the integrity of the LHB and tenodesis, examination for signs of inflammation within the sulcus or around the tendon, and measurements of the distalization of the myotendinous junction of the LHB compared with the nonoperative side.A total of 34 patients comprising group I (24 men; mean age at time of surgery, 40.3 years; mean follow-up period, 57.2 months) and 24 patients comprising group II (19 men; mean age at time of surgery, 39.8 years; mean follow-up period, 51.9 months) were evaluated. The total CMS, as well as the scores for each CMS subcategory, did not reveal significant differences between the groups. The overall LHB score was on average 10 points higher in group I (mean, 94 points) than in group II (mean, 84 points) (P = .016). Regarding the LHB score subcategories, group I showed significantly better results for patient-dependent cosmesis (mean, 15 points in group I vs. 12 points in group II; P = .005) and examiner-dependent cosmesis (mean, 14 points in group I vs. 10 points in group II; P = .001). This finding was substantiated by a significantly higher distalization of the myotendinous junction in group II (mean, 3.0 cm in group I vs. 3.8 cm in group II; P = .030).This study shows that subpectoral in situ tenodesis of the LHB followed by arthroscopic resection of the intra-articular portion provides higher LHB scores and better cosmetic outcomes compared with proximal intra-articular tenotomy followed by subpectoral tenodesis." @default.
• W4313561560 created "2023-01-06" @default.
• W4313561560 creator A5004270853 @default.
• W4313561560 creator A5010958698 @default.
• W4313561560 creator A5034701002 @default.
• W4313561560 creator A5040951638 @default.
• W4313561560 creator A5042834570 @default.
• W4313561560 creator A5052074837 @default.
• W4313561560 creator A5055175391 @default.
• W4313561560 creator A5090726689 @default.
• W4313561560 date "2023-06-01" @default.
• W4313561560 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4313561560 title "Subpectoral biceps tenodesis with BicepsButton fixation in the young population: which technique works best?" @default.
• W4313561560 cites W1277135126 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W1928464816 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W1968020298 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2002496824 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2008269874 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2012241439 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2037405274 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2037845629 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2046655005 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2069777685 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2073791390 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2081985815 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2086652156 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2088573655 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2090223913 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2093274439 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2097843668 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2099099079 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2103474012 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2116998212 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2124615378 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2125052056 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2126049444 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2130651489 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2168013714 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2168185129 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2200596503 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2213857165 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2232942360 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2346956889 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2416985409 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2430603966 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2535566991 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2560969325 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2728881156 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2736437007 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W2947353304 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W3002645008 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W3013094074 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W3026310834 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W3113112997 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W3117981011 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W3123708156 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W3129533818 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W3163488193 @default.
• W4313561560 cites W4221013507 @default.
• W4313561560 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2022.12.008" @default.
• W4313561560 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36621749" @default.
• W4313561560 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4313561560 type Work @default.
• W4313561560 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4313561560 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4313561560 hasAuthorship W4313561560A5004270853 @default.
• W4313561560 hasAuthorship W4313561560A5010958698 @default.
• W4313561560 hasAuthorship W4313561560A5034701002 @default.
• W4313561560 hasAuthorship W4313561560A5040951638 @default.
• W4313561560 hasAuthorship W4313561560A5042834570 @default.
• W4313561560 hasAuthorship W4313561560A5052074837 @default.
• W4313561560 hasAuthorship W4313561560A5055175391 @default.
• W4313561560 hasAuthorship W4313561560A5090726689 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConcept C2776470705 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConcept C2776511800 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConcept C2780105995 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConcept C2781425419 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConceptScore W4313561560C141071460 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConceptScore W4313561560C146249460 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConceptScore W4313561560C2776470705 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConceptScore W4313561560C2776511800 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConceptScore W4313561560C2780105995 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConceptScore W4313561560C2781184374 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConceptScore W4313561560C2781425419 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConceptScore W4313561560C2908647359 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConceptScore W4313561560C71924100 @default.
• W4313561560 hasConceptScore W4313561560C99454951 @default.
• W4313561560 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W4313561560 hasLocation W43135615601 @default.
• W4313561560 hasLocation W43135615602 @default.
• W4313561560 hasOpenAccess W4313561560 @default.
• W4313561560 hasPrimaryLocation W43135615601 @default.

• next