FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313595962> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4313595962 endingPage "229" @default.
• W4313595962 startingPage "215" @default.
• W4313595962 abstract "The objective of the present work was to study the effects of contamination on the reflective properties of groundcovers used for enhancing fruit colouration in the orchard. Contamination also affects longevity and possible sustainable re-use of materials. A white, woven textile (polypropylene Lumilys™) and silver aluminium foil were experimentally contaminated with soil, similar to the situation after an autumn storm in a fruit orchard. Clean material served as control.Using a spectrophotometer (StellarNet; Tampa, FL, USA), vertically directed (0°) and diffuse (45°) light reflection in the range of 500-850 nm was compared from clean and contaminated groundcover in the laboratory. Reflection from vertically directed aluminium foil exceeded that of Lumilys™; however, the highest reflection in all spectral measurements was at 45° (diffuse) from the clean woven textile, i.e., in all directions, and exceeded that of aluminium foil. In contrast, the contaminated vertically directed (0°) aluminium foil reflected less light than the clear foil but, surprisingly, reflected much more light at 45° than the clean foil. Both materials showed reflection peaks at 625-640 nm; light spectra and peaks remained unchanged irrespective of soil contamination.Light reflection in the visible range (PAR, 400-700 nm) was concomitantly measured in the field at CKA Klein-Altendorf near Bonn (50°N), Germany, at 0.5 m and 1 m height using a portable TRP‑3 light sensor (PP-Systems, Amesbury, MA, USA) on sunny and cloudy days at a solar angle of 49°. Surprisingly, in these field measurements, Lumilys and aluminium foil reflected most light in both directions (0° and 45°) when slightly to moderately contaminated. Only with heavy contamination did the reflection decrease. Both groundcovers reflected more light than the grass in alleyways of fruit orchards or open soil under the trees.UV‑B reflection (280-315 nm) was examined in parallel in the field using an X1 optometer (Gigahertz Optik, Türkenfels, Deutschland), as it enhances anthocyanin biosynthesis and red fruit colouration in combination with PAR and low temperature. Straight (0°) UV‑B reflection from aluminium foil exceeded that from white woven textile (Lumilys™) on both clear and overcast autumn days. As expected, straight (0°) UV‑B reflection from aluminium foil decreased with soil contamination to a certain extent, but it unexpectedly increased from the woven textile with soil contamination.Surface roughness in dependence of contamination was measured non-destructively by a profilometer type VR5200 (Keyence, Osaka, Japan). The roughness index, Sa, increased from 22 to 28 µm with soil contamination of the woven textile and from to 2 to 11 µm with aluminium foil, possibly explaining differences in the observed reflectivity.Overall, the expected severe decline in light reflection (PAR and UV-B) was not seen. In contrast, light (2-3 g soil/m2) and moderate (4-12 g soil/m2) contamination improved light reflection of PAR (400-700 nm) and UV‑B (280-315 nm) by woven textile (Lumilys™) and aluminum foil. Thus, with slight contamination the materials can be reused, whereas severe contamination (24-51 g soil/m2) reduces light reflection." @default.
• W4313595962 created "2023-01-06" @default.
• W4313595962 creator A5014179512 @default.
• W4313595962 creator A5055301478 @default.
• W4313595962 creator A5079184252 @default.
• W4313595962 creator A5083091215 @default.
• W4313595962 date "2023-01-04" @default.
• W4313595962 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4313595962 title "Einfluss der Verschmutzung von Reflexionsfolien auf ihr Reflexionsverhalten" @default.
• W4313595962 cites W1581193770 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W1832433295 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W1873187452 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W1964687677 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W1998587460 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W2003138919 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W2049895323 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W2064710811 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W2077264896 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W2098241686 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W2115567773 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W2206905114 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W2510501291 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W2590060643 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W2765615092 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W2890113331 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W2906387238 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W3172569386 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W4307278202 @default.
• W4313595962 cites W587859063 @default.
• W4313595962 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10341-022-00799-z" @default.
• W4313595962 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37006815" @default.
• W4313595962 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4313595962 type Work @default.
• W4313595962 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4313595962 countsByYear W43135959622023 @default.
• W4313595962 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4313595962 hasAuthorship W4313595962A5014179512 @default.
• W4313595962 hasAuthorship W4313595962A5055301478 @default.
• W4313595962 hasAuthorship W4313595962A5079184252 @default.
• W4313595962 hasAuthorship W4313595962A5083091215 @default.
• W4313595962 hasBestOaLocation W43135959621 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConcept C199289684 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConcept C2776477544 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConcept C2992077724 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConcept C513153333 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConcept C7363328 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConceptScore W4313595962C120665830 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConceptScore W4313595962C121332964 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConceptScore W4313595962C159985019 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConceptScore W4313595962C185592680 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConceptScore W4313595962C191897082 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConceptScore W4313595962C192562407 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConceptScore W4313595962C199289684 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConceptScore W4313595962C2776477544 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConceptScore W4313595962C2779227376 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConceptScore W4313595962C2992077724 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConceptScore W4313595962C513153333 @default.
• W4313595962 hasConceptScore W4313595962C7363328 @default.
• W4313595962 hasFunder F4320324900 @default.
• W4313595962 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4313595962 hasLocation W43135959621 @default.
• W4313595962 hasLocation W43135959622 @default.
• W4313595962 hasLocation W43135959623 @default.
• W4313595962 hasOpenAccess W4313595962 @default.
• W4313595962 hasPrimaryLocation W43135959621 @default.
• W4313595962 hasRelatedWork W1994304187 @default.
• W4313595962 hasRelatedWork W2078504260 @default.
• W4313595962 hasRelatedWork W2315099416 @default.
• W4313595962 hasRelatedWork W2351642328 @default.
• W4313595962 hasRelatedWork W2354888973 @default.
• W4313595962 hasRelatedWork W2376312325 @default.
• W4313595962 hasRelatedWork W2377696635 @default.
• W4313595962 hasRelatedWork W2387173216 @default.
• W4313595962 hasRelatedWork W2388156348 @default.
• W4313595962 hasRelatedWork W2390880319 @default.
• W4313595962 hasVolume "65" @default.
• W4313595962 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4313595962 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4313595962 workType "article" @default.