FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313648548> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4313648548 endingPage "57" @default.
• W4313648548 startingPage "50" @default.
• W4313648548 abstract "Background: Research integrity has obtained much attention in research communities, but also in the general public. To improve research integrity is difficult as it involves complex systems of knowledge, attitudes, and practices. The objective of this study is to investigate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of cohorts of PhD candidates at one faculty (of medicine) over time and compare this to finished PhDs of the same cohorts. Material and method: Researchers (n = 186) awarded the degree PhD at the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Oslo in 2019 were invited to answer a questionnaire about knowledge, attitudes and actions related to scientific dishonesty. 94 responded (50.5%). The results were compared with results among first-year PhD candidates who responded to the same questionnaire during 2010-20 (n = 536) and to those who finished PhDs in 2016 (n = 86). Results: For the years 2010-2020 1.1% of the PhD candidates report to have engaged in severe scientific misconduct (FFP) while 0.9% report to have presented results in a misleading way. 2.3% report that they know of persons at their department who have engaged in FFP the last 12 months. In total 1.5% report to have experienced pressure to engage in severe scientific misconduct (FFP) while 2.1% report to have experienced pressure to present results in a misleading way. On average 12.8% report to have been exposed to unethical pressure concerning inclusion or ordering of authors during the last 12 months, and 28.8% report to have knowledge about their department's written policies about research integrity. While some attitudes improve over the years, attitudes in general are not much changed from 2010-2020. None of the PhDs that received a PhD from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Oslo in 2019 reported to have engaged in FFT or having experienced pressure to do so.1.1% experienced pressure to present results in other misleading ways, while 26.6% of respondents had experienced unethical pressure in relation to authorship during the course of the PhD fellowship. 4.3% knew about someone at their department who had presented results in a misleading manner. Some attitudes were not in line with traditional conceptions of research integrity, but most agreed that their research environment displayed research integrity. Conclusion: This long-term follow up study shows that few PhD-candidates report to engage in severe scientific misconduct, that they experience little pressure to do so, and with some exceptions, attitudes in in line with good research integrity. However, pressure in relation to authorship is relatively common. There is some improvement in research integrity from PhD candidates to recently finished PhDs, but in general research integrity is stable over time." @default.
• W4313648548 created "2023-01-07" @default.
• W4313648548 creator A5043353006 @default.
• W4313648548 creator A5058531157 @default.
• W4313648548 creator A5087469787 @default.
• W4313648548 date "2023-01-05" @default.
• W4313648548 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4313648548 title "Research Integrity Attitudes and Behaviors are Difficult to alter: Results from a ten Year Follow-up Study in Norway" @default.
• W4313648548 cites W1966297423 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W1985941339 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2001574413 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2121099057 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2140610793 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2142846502 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2150553571 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2152243616 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2153384714 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2214412047 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2525214189 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2525852335 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2567289819 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2738796648 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2796384986 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2803722409 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2805625340 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2805968226 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W2980989760 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W3034383191 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W3042990871 @default.
• W4313648548 cites W3183684960 @default.
• W4313648548 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646221150032" @default.
• W4313648548 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36604861" @default.
• W4313648548 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4313648548 type Work @default.
• W4313648548 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W4313648548 countsByYear W43136485482023 @default.
• W4313648548 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4313648548 hasAuthorship W4313648548A5043353006 @default.
• W4313648548 hasAuthorship W4313648548A5058531157 @default.
• W4313648548 hasAuthorship W4313648548A5087469787 @default.
• W4313648548 hasBestOaLocation W43136485481 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C109359841 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C2776603611 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C2778024590 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C2778585151 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C2779390046 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C2780587575 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C2993209047 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C2994190893 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C71008984 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConcept C95121780 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C109359841 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C127413603 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C142724271 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C15744967 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C17744445 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C199539241 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C204787440 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C2524010 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C2776603611 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C2778024590 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C2778585151 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C2779390046 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C2780587575 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C2993209047 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C2994190893 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C33923547 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C39549134 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C509550671 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C512399662 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C55587333 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C71008984 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C71924100 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C77805123 @default.
• W4313648548 hasConceptScore W4313648548C95121780 @default.
• W4313648548 hasIssue "1-2" @default.
• W4313648548 hasLocation W43136485481 @default.
• W4313648548 hasLocation W43136485482 @default.
• W4313648548 hasLocation W43136485483 @default.
• W4313648548 hasOpenAccess W4313648548 @default.
• W4313648548 hasPrimaryLocation W43136485481 @default.
• W4313648548 hasRelatedWork W1840669173 @default.
• W4313648548 hasRelatedWork W2329871427 @default.
• W4313648548 hasRelatedWork W2392025926 @default.

• next