FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4313651024> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4313651024 endingPage "505" @default.
• W4313651024 startingPage "494" @default.
• W4313651024 abstract "Objective: A prospective, longitudinal, randomized controlled trial with an original crossover design for 1 year was conducted to compare manual fitting to artificial intelligence-based fitting in newly implanted patients. Design: Twenty-four patients who received their first cochlear implant (CI) were randomly assigned to the manual or Fitting to Outcome eXpert (FOX) arm; they followed the corresponding fitting procedures for 1 year. After 1 year, each patient was switched to another arm. The number of fittings, auditory outcomes (pure-tone thresholds, loudness scaling curves, spectral discrimination scores, bisyllabic word recognition in quiet and noise, and speech tracking), fitting session questionnaire, and CI parameters (T level, C level, Threshold Sound Pressure Level (T-SPL), Comfortable Sound Pressure Level (C-SPL), and loudness growth value) were compared between the two groups. Differences between the two groups were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test, and Holm corrections were applied for multiple statistical tests. At the end of the crossover session, patients were offered the choice to continue with their old or new map. Results: As early as 3 mo postactivation, the FOX group showed less variability and significantly better speech intelligibility in quiet conditions at 40 and 55 dB SPL and noise ( p < 0.05) with median phoneme scores of 50%, 70%, and 50% at 55, 70, and 85 dB SPL compared with 45%, 50%, and 40%, respectively. This group showed better results at 12 mo postactivation ( p < 0.05). In the manual group, 100% of the patients decided to keep the new FOX map, and 82% performed better with the FOX map. In the FOX group, 63% of the patients decided to keep the manual map, although the measurable outcome had not improved. In this group, participants reported to prefer the manual map because it felt more comfortable, even if the FOX map gave better measured outcome. Conclusion: Although the study size remains relatively small, the AI-FOX approach was equivalent to or even outperformed the manual approach in hearing performance, comfort, and resources. Furthermore, FOX is a tool capable of continuous improvement by comparing its predictions with observed results and is continuously learning from clinicians’ practice, which is why this technology promises major advances in the future." @default.
• W4313651024 created "2023-01-07" @default.
• W4313651024 creator A5021248526 @default.
• W4313651024 creator A5027368168 @default.
• W4313651024 creator A5032937800 @default.
• W4313651024 creator A5050661064 @default.
• W4313651024 creator A5050950183 @default.
• W4313651024 creator A5076253843 @default.
• W4313651024 creator A5077444265 @default.
• W4313651024 date "2022-12-21" @default.
• W4313651024 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4313651024 title "Prospective Comparison Between Manual and Computer-Assisted (FOX) Cochlear Implant Fitting in Newly Implanted Patients" @default.
• W4313651024 cites W1980753005 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2003348160 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2025518054 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2025830946 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2085410502 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2133135172 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2147170001 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2334892031 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2562867489 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2614104307 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2744996849 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2751540837 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2757170129 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2789959442 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2885000689 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2886632330 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2974839256 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W2997106309 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W3011060819 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W3025066323 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W3037410840 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W3053287441 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W3091905512 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W3121052103 @default.
• W4313651024 cites W3133723897 @default.
• W4313651024 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001314" @default.
• W4313651024 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36607743" @default.
• W4313651024 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4313651024 type Work @default.
• W4313651024 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4313651024 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4313651024 hasAuthorship W4313651024A5021248526 @default.
• W4313651024 hasAuthorship W4313651024A5027368168 @default.
• W4313651024 hasAuthorship W4313651024A5032937800 @default.
• W4313651024 hasAuthorship W4313651024A5050661064 @default.
• W4313651024 hasAuthorship W4313651024A5050950183 @default.
• W4313651024 hasAuthorship W4313651024A5076253843 @default.
• W4313651024 hasAuthorship W4313651024A5077444265 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConcept C12868164 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConcept C27081682 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConcept C2776992516 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConcept C2777185736 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConcept C2778882171 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConcept C79018884 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConcept C87813604 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConceptScore W4313651024C121332964 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConceptScore W4313651024C126322002 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConceptScore W4313651024C12868164 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConceptScore W4313651024C142724271 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConceptScore W4313651024C204787440 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConceptScore W4313651024C27081682 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConceptScore W4313651024C2776992516 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConceptScore W4313651024C2777185736 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConceptScore W4313651024C2778882171 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConceptScore W4313651024C548259974 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConceptScore W4313651024C62520636 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConceptScore W4313651024C71924100 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConceptScore W4313651024C79018884 @default.
• W4313651024 hasConceptScore W4313651024C87813604 @default.
• W4313651024 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4313651024 hasLocation W43136510241 @default.
• W4313651024 hasLocation W43136510242 @default.
• W4313651024 hasOpenAccess W4313651024 @default.
• W4313651024 hasPrimaryLocation W43136510241 @default.
• W4313651024 hasRelatedWork W1971958216 @default.
• W4313651024 hasRelatedWork W1986778439 @default.
• W4313651024 hasRelatedWork W2015691606 @default.
• W4313651024 hasRelatedWork W2045937423 @default.
• W4313651024 hasRelatedWork W2062350703 @default.
• W4313651024 hasRelatedWork W2160258024 @default.
• W4313651024 hasRelatedWork W2315798324 @default.
• W4313651024 hasRelatedWork W4237245648 @default.
• W4313651024 hasRelatedWork W4283454420 @default.
• W4313651024 hasRelatedWork W4311418311 @default.
• W4313651024 hasVolume "44" @default.
• W4313651024 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4313651024 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4313651024 workType "article" @default.