Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4315486264> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4315486264 endingPage "285" @default.
- W4315486264 startingPage "285" @default.
- W4315486264 abstract "Monoculture forests formed by Fagus sylvatica L. belong to one of the most sensitive forest ecosystems, mainly at low altitudes. Cultivation of this species in mixed stands should reduce its sensitivity to drought in the vegetation period, which is why we researched the water balance in one pure-beech (i.e., monoculture) and one beech–oak–linden (i.e., mixed) forest. This research was carried out in Drahanská vrchovina in the Czech Republic in the period 2019–2021. The total precipitation was measured, together with its partitions (i.e., throughfall and stemflow), and the crown interception was also calculated. The total forest transpiration was calculated from the values measured on the sample trees. The values of each rainfall partition and transpiration (and their percentages) were compared. The rainfall partitions in the monoculture forest differed from those in the mixed forest. While, on average, the annual percentages of the throughfall, stemflow and crown interception in the monoculture forest were 63%, 6% and 31%, respectively, these partitions in the mixed forest were 76%, 2% and 22%, respectively. The crown interception was greater in the monoculture (31% of precipitation) and the effective precipitation (i.e., the sum of throughfall and stemflow) was greater in the mixed forest (78% of precipitation). The greatest differences (in each rainfall partition) between the monoculture and mixed forest were in the summer and winter. The throughfall was greater in the mixed forest (ca. 22% in the summer and ca. 12% in the winter), and the stemflow was greater in the monoculture forest (ca. 66% in the summer and ca. 51% in the winter). The mean annual transpiration was 318 (±52) mm in the monoculture and 451 (±58) mm in the mixed forest, i.e., about 99 (±65) mm more in the mixed forest than in the monoculture forest. The transpiration, in comparison with the effective precipitation, made up, on average, 70% of the effective precipitation in the monoculture forest. On the other hand, the transpiration reached 71% (in 2019), 74% (in 2020) and even 100% (in 2021) of the effective precipitation in the mixed forest. Our results show that an oak–beech–linden mixed forest can manage water better than a beech monoculture because more precipitation leaked through the mixed forest onto the soil than through the monoculture, especially via the throughfall in the summer. On the other hand, the amount of water that transpired was greater in the mixed forest than in the monoculture. However, the utilisation of the effective precipitation by trees was very similar in the monoculture in all three years, while, in the mixed forest, the utilisation of the effective water by trees increased, which may have been caused by the saturation of the deeper soil layers with water in the first two years of measurement. We can, Therefore, say that, at lower altitudes, it will be more suitable in the future to cultivate beech in mixed forests because of the assumed lack of water (mainly in early spring and summer)." @default.
- W4315486264 created "2023-01-11" @default.
- W4315486264 creator A5027488229 @default.
- W4315486264 creator A5035716805 @default.
- W4315486264 creator A5050739109 @default.
- W4315486264 creator A5072120933 @default.
- W4315486264 creator A5081341233 @default.
- W4315486264 creator A5084484027 @default.
- W4315486264 date "2023-01-09" @default.
- W4315486264 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W4315486264 title "Comparison of Rainfall Partitioning and Estimation of the Utilisation of Available Water in a Monoculture Beech Forest and a Mixed Beech-Oak-Linden Forest" @default.
- W4315486264 cites W151102513 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W1893994717 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W1979637435 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W1983955113 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W1994942390 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2007373388 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2018043145 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2025163636 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2025492372 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2028544935 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2035151623 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2036862178 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2038544278 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2041881370 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2055116952 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2056859580 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2061523216 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2084425467 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2094505438 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2100956064 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2101914480 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2105284044 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2112931509 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2119788488 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2122327042 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2122406789 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2140131090 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2147218933 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2148989614 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2151013015 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2163527291 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2168969772 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2334744162 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2531683728 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2755735529 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2790808327 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2884055931 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W2922449990 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W3019222606 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W3097668509 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W3112229143 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W3212766504 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W4200559125 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W4280571726 @default.
- W4315486264 cites W957437612 @default.
- W4315486264 doi "https://doi.org/10.3390/w15020285" @default.
- W4315486264 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4315486264 type Work @default.
- W4315486264 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W4315486264 countsByYear W43154862642023 @default.
- W4315486264 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4315486264 hasAuthorship W4315486264A5027488229 @default.
- W4315486264 hasAuthorship W4315486264A5035716805 @default.
- W4315486264 hasAuthorship W4315486264A5050739109 @default.
- W4315486264 hasAuthorship W4315486264A5072120933 @default.
- W4315486264 hasAuthorship W4315486264A5081341233 @default.
- W4315486264 hasAuthorship W4315486264A5084484027 @default.
- W4315486264 hasBestOaLocation W43154862641 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C107054158 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C110872660 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C153294291 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C157005057 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C159390177 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C159750122 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C2776440620 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C2776500793 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C2779705648 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C2780144066 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C54286561 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C55157361 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C61270487 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C6557445 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C73935091 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C76886044 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C91354502 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConcept C97137747 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConceptScore W4315486264C107054158 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConceptScore W4315486264C110872660 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConceptScore W4315486264C127313418 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConceptScore W4315486264C153294291 @default.
- W4315486264 hasConceptScore W4315486264C157005057 @default.