FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4315696042> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4315696042 endingPage "68" @default.
• W4315696042 startingPage "65" @default.
• W4315696042 abstract "BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures, which has gradually evolved to become one of the safest surgeries. However, no procedure is without risk; in this context, biliary duct injury (BDI) is the most important intraoperative complication during cholecystectomy. Common bile duct injury reaches a variable incidence between 0.4 to 1.4%, which is associated with significant long-term morbidity, including stenosis and recurrent cholangitis, significant limitations in the life quality of the patient [1]. In order to reduce the incidence of BDI, several alternative procedures can be performed during a difficult cholecystectomy, among which we can list: cholecystostomy, subtotal cholecystectomy and/or conversion to open cholecystectomy. Subtotal cholecystectomy, according to several meta-analyses, minimizes the possibility of bile duct injury, however, it is associated with the persistence or development of symptomatic gallstones in the remnant of the gallbladder or cystic duct; when this occurs, it is necessary to reoperate on symptomatic patients [1,2]. It is estimated that between 5-40% of patients who have previously undergone cholecystectomy, may present episodes of abdominal pain like those that initially motivated the surgical indication, grouped under the term post-cholecystectomy syndrome (PCS) [3]. PCS is mainly caused by residual lithiasis, which represents approximately 21.3% of readmissions [4]; other causes of PCS include: stenosis or bile leak, neuroma in the scar tissue, biliary dyskinesia, Oddi sphincter dysfunction. It is also worth highlighting, within the causes, the cystic duct remnant syndrome defined as presence of a residual cystic duct greater than 1 cm that produces symptoms as a consequence of the lithiasis inside it, with a prevalence of less than 2.5% among patients that underwent cholecystectomy; however, a high index of suspicion will allow us to recognize it in the immediate postoperative period or even several years later [3,4]. The age range of onset of cystic duct remnant syndrome is from 21 to 90 years. The female preponderance of gallstones is the probable reason for greater frequency of the syndrome in this gender. Clinically, the main reason for consultation is abdominal pain in the right hypochondrium and epigastrium, which occurs in 77% of the patients; accompanied by nausea, in 44% of patients; vomiting in 31% and fever in 19% of patients [5]. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is the non-invasive technique of choice for evaluating the biliary tree, relegating endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as a strictly therapeutic technique. In addition, ERCP with sphincterotomy and possible placement of a stent to aid drainage of the main bile duct can be performed, along with definitive surgical treatment, by gallbladder and/or cystic remnant resection [3]. This case report details an experience of surgical reintervention in a patient with a remnant gallbladder and cystic duct with lithiasis." @default.
• W4315696042 created "2023-01-12" @default.
• W4315696042 creator A5000997226 @default.
• W4315696042 creator A5011920300 @default.
• W4315696042 creator A5018044373 @default.
• W4315696042 creator A5057018535 @default.
• W4315696042 date "2022-04-30" @default.
• W4315696042 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4315696042 title "Video Caso Clínico: Síndrome del muñón del cístico, resección laparoscópica del remanente" @default.
• W4315696042 doi "https://doi.org/10.14410/2022.14.1.vc.11" @default.
• W4315696042 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4315696042 type Work @default.
• W4315696042 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4315696042 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4315696042 hasAuthorship W4315696042A5000997226 @default.
• W4315696042 hasAuthorship W4315696042A5011920300 @default.
• W4315696042 hasAuthorship W4315696042A5018044373 @default.
• W4315696042 hasAuthorship W4315696042A5057018535 @default.
• W4315696042 hasBestOaLocation W43156960421 @default.
• W4315696042 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4315696042 hasConcept C2776641081 @default.
• W4315696042 hasConcept C2777148285 @default.
• W4315696042 hasConcept C2777153553 @default.
• W4315696042 hasConcept C2779777945 @default.
• W4315696042 hasConcept C2780354107 @default.
• W4315696042 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W4315696042 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4315696042 hasConceptScore W4315696042C141071460 @default.
• W4315696042 hasConceptScore W4315696042C2776641081 @default.
• W4315696042 hasConceptScore W4315696042C2777148285 @default.
• W4315696042 hasConceptScore W4315696042C2777153553 @default.
• W4315696042 hasConceptScore W4315696042C2779777945 @default.
• W4315696042 hasConceptScore W4315696042C2780354107 @default.
• W4315696042 hasConceptScore W4315696042C61434518 @default.
• W4315696042 hasConceptScore W4315696042C71924100 @default.
• W4315696042 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4315696042 hasLocation W43156960421 @default.
• W4315696042 hasOpenAccess W4315696042 @default.
• W4315696042 hasPrimaryLocation W43156960421 @default.
• W4315696042 hasRelatedWork W2031089113 @default.
• W4315696042 hasRelatedWork W2129388697 @default.
• W4315696042 hasRelatedWork W2195080116 @default.
• W4315696042 hasRelatedWork W2359063267 @default.
• W4315696042 hasRelatedWork W2369038959 @default.
• W4315696042 hasRelatedWork W2413743942 @default.
• W4315696042 hasRelatedWork W2418317605 @default.
• W4315696042 hasRelatedWork W2991346739 @default.
• W4315696042 hasRelatedWork W3028965581 @default.
• W4315696042 hasRelatedWork W3203962646 @default.
• W4315696042 hasVolume "14" @default.
• W4315696042 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4315696042 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4315696042 workType "article" @default.