Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4315697870> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 42 of
42
with 100 items per page.
- W4315697870 endingPage "229" @default.
- W4315697870 startingPage "217" @default.
- W4315697870 abstract "This paper explores the reasons for Frege’s silence about Bolzano whom he should have recognized as a predecessor and ally in the fight against subjectivist and psychological foundations of logic. As far as we know, Frege never quoted or mentioned Bolzano although Benno Kerry, Edmund Husserl, and Alwin Korselt recommended him to Frege. Frege had probably read at least the first part of the Paradoxes of the Infinite and maybe had a glimpse at the Theory of Science (Wissenschaftslehre) during his controversy with Korselt. Let us imagine Frege’s hidden diaries where he exposed his critical remarks on Bolzano. If Frege had been an attentive reader of the Wissenschaftslehre, what he was not, he should have noticed a number of passages where his own views coincide with those of Bolzano. Instead of this, he points out Bolzano’s mistakes and oddities. Above all, however, Frege wanted to stress the essential differences between his logic and that of Bolzano which concern: (1) analysis of the structure of propositions, (2) the necessity of a conceptual notation for the expression of logical laws, (3) Bolzano’s neglect of the role of logical constants (he has no truth functions), (4) his inadequate conception of variables, (5) the limited scope of his theory of arguments (Schlusslehre), (6) the confused relation of grounding (Abfolge), and (7) inadequacy of his theory of collections and of his concept of number. Moreover, already Husserl was puzzled about Bolzano’s definition of logic as a science of writing scientific textbooks. Another oddity consists in the fuzziness of the limits of logic. Eventually, his most important definitions, especially that of deducibility, are too complicated and impossible to formalize, compared with the simplicity of the Fregean rule of modus ponens. Can Bolzano answer to Frege’s criticism?" @default.
- W4315697870 created "2023-01-12" @default.
- W4315697870 creator A5014757325 @default.
- W4315697870 date "2022-01-01" @default.
- W4315697870 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W4315697870 title "Frege’s Silence About Bolzano" @default.
- W4315697870 cites W4213422036 @default.
- W4315697870 cites W4249525571 @default.
- W4315697870 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94452-0_11" @default.
- W4315697870 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4315697870 type Work @default.
- W4315697870 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4315697870 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
- W4315697870 hasAuthorship W4315697870A5014757325 @default.
- W4315697870 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
- W4315697870 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W4315697870 hasConcept C121375916 @default.
- W4315697870 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W4315697870 hasConcept C2781115785 @default.
- W4315697870 hasConceptScore W4315697870C107038049 @default.
- W4315697870 hasConceptScore W4315697870C111472728 @default.
- W4315697870 hasConceptScore W4315697870C121375916 @default.
- W4315697870 hasConceptScore W4315697870C138885662 @default.
- W4315697870 hasConceptScore W4315697870C2781115785 @default.
- W4315697870 hasLocation W43156978701 @default.
- W4315697870 hasOpenAccess W4315697870 @default.
- W4315697870 hasPrimaryLocation W43156978701 @default.
- W4315697870 hasRelatedWork W1987346758 @default.
- W4315697870 hasRelatedWork W2070051673 @default.
- W4315697870 hasRelatedWork W2070720935 @default.
- W4315697870 hasRelatedWork W2108611755 @default.
- W4315697870 hasRelatedWork W2132997838 @default.
- W4315697870 hasRelatedWork W2136263737 @default.
- W4315697870 hasRelatedWork W2182227470 @default.
- W4315697870 hasRelatedWork W2615415291 @default.
- W4315697870 hasRelatedWork W2911125927 @default.
- W4315697870 hasRelatedWork W3124129869 @default.
- W4315697870 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4315697870 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4315697870 workType "book-chapter" @default.