FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4315797923> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4315797923 endingPage "162.e9" @default.
• W4315797923 startingPage "162.e1" @default.
• W4315797923 abstract "Previous analyses have demonstrated the cost effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation for healthy nulliparous people. However, elective induction of labor is resource intensive, and optimal resource allocation requires a thorough understanding of which subgroups of patients will benefit most.This study aimed to determine whether induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation is more cost-effective in patients with favorable or unfavorable cervical examinations.We constructed 2 decision analysis models using TreeAge software: one modeling induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation vs expectant management for a group of nulliparous patients with unfavorable cervical examinations and the other modeling induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation vs expectant management for a group with favorable cervical examinations. Estimates of cost, probability, and health state utility were derived from the literature. Based on previous literature, we assumed that people with favorable cervical examinations would have a lower baseline rate of cesarean delivery and higher rates of spontaneous labor.In our base case analysis, induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation was cost-effective for patients with unfavorable cervical examinations, but not for patients with favorable cervical examinations. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year was 50-fold lower for people with unfavorable cervical examinations ($2150 vs $115,100). Induction of labor resulted in 3885 fewer cesarean deliveries and 58 fewer stillbirths per 100,000 patients for those with unfavorable examinations, whereas induction of labor resulted in 2293 fewer cesarean deliveries and 48 fewer stillbirths with labor induction for those with favorable cervical examinations. The results were sensitive to multiple inputs, including the likelihood of cesarean delivery, the cost of induction, the cost of vaginal or cesarean delivery, and the probability of spontaneous labor. In Monte Carlo analysis, the base case findings held true for 64.1% of modeled scenarios for patients with unfavorable cervixes and 55.4% of modeled scenarios for patients with favorable cervixes.With a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year, induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation may be cost-effective for patients with unfavorable cervical examinations, but not for patients with favorable cervical examinations. This result was driven by the likelihood of labor in patients with favorable cervical examinations, and the resultant avoidance of prolonged pregnancy and its complications, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and stillbirths. Health systems may wish to prioritize patients with unfavorable cervical examinations for elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation, which may be opposite to common practice." @default.
• W4315797923 created "2023-01-13" @default.
• W4315797923 creator A5033333892 @default.
• W4315797923 creator A5080905135 @default.
• W4315797923 creator A5082295794 @default.
• W4315797923 date "2023-08-01" @default.
• W4315797923 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W4315797923 title "Cost-effectiveness of induction of labor at 39 weeks vs expectant management by cervical examination" @default.
• W4315797923 cites W1495891523 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W1969335557 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W1979168281 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W1984482031 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W1996665495 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W1997979915 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2011000634 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2011998056 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2012337918 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2031092397 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2034456357 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2040589287 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2058056848 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2059605381 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2087429830 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2094486088 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2147142253 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2153893721 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2318239034 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2589164015 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2781510879 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2885001224 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2887854776 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2911317516 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2998344309 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W2999593232 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W3034957562 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W3035502724 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W3042033757 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W3193994659 @default.
• W4315797923 cites W4210677128 @default.
• W4315797923 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.010" @default.
• W4315797923 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36642340" @default.
• W4315797923 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4315797923 type Work @default.
• W4315797923 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4315797923 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4315797923 hasAuthorship W4315797923A5033333892 @default.
• W4315797923 hasAuthorship W4315797923A5080905135 @default.
• W4315797923 hasAuthorship W4315797923A5082295794 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConcept C2776176026 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConcept C2780802667 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConcept C3017551526 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConcept C3019815172 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConcept C46973012 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConceptScore W4315797923C126322002 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConceptScore W4315797923C131872663 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConceptScore W4315797923C2776176026 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConceptScore W4315797923C2779234561 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConceptScore W4315797923C2780802667 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConceptScore W4315797923C29456083 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConceptScore W4315797923C3017551526 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConceptScore W4315797923C3019815172 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConceptScore W4315797923C46973012 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConceptScore W4315797923C54355233 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConceptScore W4315797923C71924100 @default.
• W4315797923 hasConceptScore W4315797923C86803240 @default.
• W4315797923 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4315797923 hasLocation W43157979231 @default.
• W4315797923 hasLocation W43157979232 @default.
• W4315797923 hasOpenAccess W4315797923 @default.
• W4315797923 hasPrimaryLocation W43157979231 @default.
• W4315797923 hasRelatedWork W2000773232 @default.
• W4315797923 hasRelatedWork W2042015269 @default.
• W4315797923 hasRelatedWork W2183631511 @default.
• W4315797923 hasRelatedWork W2314859917 @default.
• W4315797923 hasRelatedWork W3008166894 @default.
• W4315797923 hasRelatedWork W3185221096 @default.
• W4315797923 hasRelatedWork W4224240671 @default.
• W4315797923 hasRelatedWork W4236794051 @default.
• W4315797923 hasRelatedWork W4237634015 @default.
• W4315797923 hasRelatedWork W2327171012 @default.
• W4315797923 hasVolume "229" @default.
• W4315797923 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4315797923 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4315797923 workType "article" @default.