FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4317776837> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4317776837 endingPage "578" @default.
• W4317776837 startingPage "572" @default.
• W4317776837 abstract "Aim We describe the clinical settings and the factors predicting outcomes in open globe injuries with concurrent orbital fracturesMethods Retrospective, consecutive, non-comparative study. All eyes from January 2014 to January 2021 with concurrent open globe injuries with orbital fractures that underwent management were included. The clinical data of each patient who underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination was entered into a browser-based electronic medical records system (eyeSmart EMR) by uniformly trained ophthalmic personnel and supervised by an ophthalmologist using a standardized template. Favorable functional outcome was defined as the final best corrected visual acuity of >20/200 as per the World Health Organization (WHO) definitions of severe visual impairment and blindness. A favorable anatomic outcome was defined as preservation of the globe, absence of hypotony, attached retina, and absence of active inflammation at the last visit. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done to assess the effect of various demographic and clinical factors and the type of orbital fracture on the final anatomic and functional outcome.Results Ninety-one eyes of 91 patients were included in the study. Females accounted for 74/91 (81.3%) of the eyes. Modes of trauma was rupture in 67%, perforating in 5.5% and penetrating in 27.5% of the cases. Orbital rim involvement was seen in 79.1%. The most common isolated fracture seen was a medial wall (19.78%), which was followed by the orbital floor (15.38%). Favorable functional outcome was seen in 10 eyes (11%), while a favorable anatomic outcome was achieved in 45 (49.5%). Odds of a favorable functional outcome were 6.12 (95% CI 1.22 to 30.71), p = .02 for an open globe injury with orbital fracture in the absence of a concurrent retinal detachment. Odds of a favorable anatomic outcome were 55.55 (95% CI 2.43 to 1250), p = .01 when the injury did not involve zone 3, 9.94 (95% CI 2.05 to 48), p = .004 when concurrent retinal detachment was absent, 16.3 (95% CI 1.42 to 187.19), p = .02 when the orbital rim was intact and 7.83 (95% CI 1.09 to 56.19), p = .04 when only one orbital wall was involved.Conclusions Open globe injuries with concurrent orbital fractures result in a very poor functional outcome. Concurrent retinal detachment is a negative predictive factor. Associated fractures involving the orbital rim increase the risk of eyeball loss." @default.
• W4317776837 created "2023-01-24" @default.
• W4317776837 creator A5016165105 @default.
• W4317776837 creator A5017933515 @default.
• W4317776837 creator A5020268292 @default.
• W4317776837 creator A5052655827 @default.
• W4317776837 date "2023-01-22" @default.
• W4317776837 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W4317776837 title "Open Globe Injuries with Concurrent Orbital Fractures – Clinical Settings and Factors Predicting Outcomes" @default.
• W4317776837 cites W1971582364 @default.
• W4317776837 cites W2021983495 @default.
• W4317776837 cites W2023033528 @default.
• W4317776837 cites W2026826551 @default.
• W4317776837 cites W2065917661 @default.
• W4317776837 cites W2071157971 @default.
• W4317776837 cites W2073887023 @default.
• W4317776837 cites W2078792448 @default.
• W4317776837 cites W2089150403 @default.
• W4317776837 cites W2124347619 @default.
• W4317776837 cites W2138022137 @default.
• W4317776837 cites W2282109751 @default.
• W4317776837 cites W2600281679 @default.
• W4317776837 cites W2792264740 @default.
• W4317776837 cites W2982488543 @default.
• W4317776837 cites W2984523886 @default.
• W4317776837 cites W3007920274 @default.
• W4317776837 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2023.2169582" @default.
• W4317776837 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36683272" @default.
• W4317776837 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4317776837 type Work @default.
• W4317776837 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4317776837 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4317776837 hasAuthorship W4317776837A5016165105 @default.
• W4317776837 hasAuthorship W4317776837A5017933515 @default.
• W4317776837 hasAuthorship W4317776837A5020268292 @default.
• W4317776837 hasAuthorship W4317776837A5052655827 @default.
• W4317776837 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4317776837 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4317776837 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W4317776837 hasConcept C195910791 @default.
• W4317776837 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W4317776837 hasConcept C2910288779 @default.
• W4317776837 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4317776837 hasConceptScore W4317776837C126322002 @default.
• W4317776837 hasConceptScore W4317776837C141071460 @default.
• W4317776837 hasConceptScore W4317776837C151956035 @default.
• W4317776837 hasConceptScore W4317776837C195910791 @default.
• W4317776837 hasConceptScore W4317776837C2778257484 @default.
• W4317776837 hasConceptScore W4317776837C2910288779 @default.
• W4317776837 hasConceptScore W4317776837C71924100 @default.
• W4317776837 hasFunder F4320323449 @default.
• W4317776837 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W4317776837 hasLocation W43177768371 @default.
• W4317776837 hasLocation W43177768372 @default.
• W4317776837 hasOpenAccess W4317776837 @default.
• W4317776837 hasPrimaryLocation W43177768371 @default.
• W4317776837 hasRelatedWork W1596769710 @default.
• W4317776837 hasRelatedWork W2074635175 @default.
• W4317776837 hasRelatedWork W2092472427 @default.
• W4317776837 hasRelatedWork W2129863591 @default.
• W4317776837 hasRelatedWork W2140728211 @default.
• W4317776837 hasRelatedWork W2351279712 @default.
• W4317776837 hasRelatedWork W23855927 @default.
• W4317776837 hasRelatedWork W2923497059 @default.
• W4317776837 hasRelatedWork W2978363435 @default.
• W4317776837 hasRelatedWork W3217448422 @default.
• W4317776837 hasVolume "38" @default.
• W4317776837 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4317776837 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4317776837 workType "article" @default.