Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4318164961> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4318164961 abstract "Background: There is growing awareness among orthopaedic clinicians that mental health directly impacts clinical musculoskeletal outcomes. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is increasingly used for mental health screening in this context, but proper interpretation of patient scores remains unclear. The purpose of the present study was to compare musculoskeletal patients’ PROMIS Depression and Anxiety scores with a board-certified clinical psychologist’s assessment of their depression and/or anxiety diagnoses, as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria. Methods: In this cross-sectional analysis, existing medical records were reviewed for 50 patients who presented to an interdisciplinary program within a tertiary care orthopaedic department for the treatment of ≥1 musculoskeletal condition. All patients completed PROMIS Depression and Anxiety measures and were evaluated by a board-certified clinical psychologist. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of PROMIS Depression and Anxiety scores as compared with the psychologist’s diagnosis of a DSM-5 depressive or anxiety disorder. Results: Twenty-eight patients (56%) were diagnosed by the psychologist with a DSM-5 depressive disorder, and 15 (30%) were diagnosed with a DSM-5 anxiety disorder. The ROC analysis for PROMIS Depression had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82. The optimal score cutoff to predict a diagnosis of a DSM-5 depressive disorder was ≥53 (sensitivity, 79% [95% CI, 63% to 94%]; specificity, 86% [72% to 100%]; positive predictive value [PPV], 88% [75% to 100%]; negative predictive value [NPV], 76% [59% to 93%]). The ROC analysis for PROMIS Anxiety had an AUC of 0.67. The optimal score cutoff to predict a diagnosis of a DSM-5 anxiety disorder was ≥59 (sensitivity, 60% [95% CI, 35% to 85%]; specificity, 74% [60% to 89%]; PPV, 50% [27% to 73%]; and NPV, 81% [68% to 95%]). Conclusions: Modestly elevated PROMIS Depression scores were suggestive of the presence of a DSM-5 depressive disorder, whereas elevations in PROMIS Anxiety scores seemed to have less association with DSM-5 anxiety disorders. Nevertheless, neither PROMIS measure demonstrated adequate discriminant ability to definitively identify patients who met DSM-5 criteria. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence." @default.
- W4318164961 created "2023-01-27" @default.
- W4318164961 creator A5015906475 @default.
- W4318164961 creator A5018086739 @default.
- W4318164961 creator A5022028438 @default.
- W4318164961 creator A5032540446 @default.
- W4318164961 creator A5061962375 @default.
- W4318164961 creator A5079443056 @default.
- W4318164961 creator A5091137340 @default.
- W4318164961 date "2023-01-01" @default.
- W4318164961 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
- W4318164961 title "Interpretation of PROMIS Depression and Anxiety Measures Compared with DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria in Musculoskeletal Patients" @default.
- W4318164961 cites W100634105 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W1761032317 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W1995215545 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2007701602 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2013812770 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2020616732 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2028746660 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2043705607 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2069518888 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2093274439 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2110495215 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2132322340 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2138871559 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2142149083 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2142262297 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2150408337 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2159516675 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2327719137 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2417574854 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2531661140 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2559773639 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2794218911 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2795942808 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2799713494 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2800509565 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2894886511 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2917876164 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2996217201 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W2998794298 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W3083932265 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W3152900673 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W3171747685 @default.
- W4318164961 cites W3209846052 @default.
- W4318164961 doi "https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.oa.22.00110" @default.
- W4318164961 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36698984" @default.
- W4318164961 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4318164961 type Work @default.
- W4318164961 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4318164961 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4318164961 hasAuthorship W4318164961A5015906475 @default.
- W4318164961 hasAuthorship W4318164961A5018086739 @default.
- W4318164961 hasAuthorship W4318164961A5022028438 @default.
- W4318164961 hasAuthorship W4318164961A5032540446 @default.
- W4318164961 hasAuthorship W4318164961A5061962375 @default.
- W4318164961 hasAuthorship W4318164961A5079443056 @default.
- W4318164961 hasAuthorship W4318164961A5091137340 @default.
- W4318164961 hasBestOaLocation W43181649611 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C2776867660 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C2780051608 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C2780733359 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C534262118 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C558461103 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C118552586 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C126322002 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C134362201 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C139719470 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C142724271 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C151730666 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C162324750 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C1862650 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C2776867660 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C2779343474 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C2780051608 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C2780733359 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C534262118 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C558461103 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C58471807 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C70410870 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C71924100 @default.
- W4318164961 hasConceptScore W4318164961C86803240 @default.
- W4318164961 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W4318164961 hasLocation W43181649611 @default.
- W4318164961 hasLocation W43181649612 @default.
- W4318164961 hasLocation W43181649613 @default.
- W4318164961 hasLocation W43181649614 @default.