FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4319294581> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4319294581 endingPage "1222" @default.
• W4319294581 startingPage "1204" @default.
• W4319294581 abstract "Abstract Background One of the most consistent findings reported in the paediatric cochlear implant (CI) literature is the heterogeneity of language performance observed more in grammatical morphology than in lexicon or pragmatics. As most of the corpus studies addressing these issues have been conducted in English, it is unclear whether their results can be generalized to other languages. In particular, little is known about languages known for their grammatical complexity, such as French. Aims The aim of this corpus study was to compare the productive use of function words (FWs) and some agreement features (AGRs) in children with CIs and children with typical development (TD) matched for mean length of utterance in words (MLU words ), a general index of grammatical complexity, and auditory experience, as measured by hearing age (HA) and chronological age (CA), respectively. Methods & Procedures Natural speech samples from 116 monolingual French‐speaking children, including 40 children with CIs followed longitudinally and 76 TD children, were collected. FWs and AGRs were analysed using a Part of Speech Tagger (POS‐T) from the Child Language Data Exchange System (CHILDES). Outcomes & Results The two groups differed by 3 years for HA and CA. No effect of family socio‐economic status (SES) was found in the CI group. Stepwise regression analyses showed that the two groups did not share the same predictors of MLU words : plurals and determiners predicted MLU words in children with CIs, at 2 and 3 years of HA, whereas feminine markers and subject‐pronouns were found to best predict MLU words in TD children at 2 and 3 years of CA. Structural equation models (SEMs), a combination of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and path analysis, yielded a different hierarchical structure of grammatical relations (GRs). Selective difficulties affecting verbal clitics and other pronominal forms were found specifically in the CI group (object‐pronouns, reflexive, relative and past participles). Dependency grammar analysis confirmed these contrasting developmental profiles in multiword utterances, such as preposition/nouns, subject/verbs, and verb/determiner/nouns. Conclusions & Implications Atypical grammatical patterns in children with CIs reflect a specific architecture of syntactic dependencies of FWs underpinning morphological complexity and syntactic connectivity. Clinical implications are discussed for assessment and intervention planning. What This Paper Adds What is already known on this subject The productive use of FWs has been identified as a particular area of weakness in children with CIs compared with TD children. In addition, heterogenous grammatical performance has often been found after 1–3 years of CI use, regardless of demographic factors such as age at implantation, duration of deafness or SES. What this paper adds to existing knowledge Assessing the early building of FWs and AGRs in children with CIs helps to understand the syntactic complexity and hierarchical structure of their language. Since most corpus studies on grammatical morphology have been conducted in English, it is not clear whether their difficulties can be generalized to other languages. The French language has a system of FWs and inflections that determine the morphophonological properties of nominal and verbal forms. Early grammar learning in children with CIs born with profound deafness were compared with the two groups of TD children matched both for duration of auditory experience (i.e., HA of CI children, CA of TD children) and for MLU words . We found a similar profile between groups at 2 years but not at 3 years for HA and CA. The two groups do not share the same predictors of MLU words : namely, plurals and determiners for CI children versus feminine markers and subject pronouns for TD children. They show a different syntactic organization of GRs. Children with CIs struggle with selective difficulties affecting verbal clitics and pronominal forms (object‐pronouns, reflexive, relative and past participles). Consistent with theories of morphophonological richness and syntactic connectivity, our results support the distributional learning hypothesis of language acquisition that infants and toddlers are sensitive to FWs and AGRs at an early age. Specific components of syntactic organization are disrupted in children with CIs. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This work has potential clinical implications because it unravels the limitations of morphophonological processing in children with CIs. Its results highlight a specific difficulty in learning FWs and AGRs in a verbal inflectional morphology context." @default.
• W4319294581 created "2023-02-07" @default.
• W4319294581 creator A5013744952 @default.
• W4319294581 creator A5076638084 @default.
• W4319294581 date "2023-02-06" @default.
• W4319294581 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4319294581 title "Early grammar‐building in French‐speaking deaf children with cochlear implants: A follow‐up corpus study" @default.
• W4319294581 cites W1141829690 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W134248847 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W1484892464 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W1893247670 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W1938056383 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W1966121413 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W1967189899 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W1972568108 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W1976810836 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W1977197476 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W1989444946 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W1990111101 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W1990410386 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W1999018419 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2010855331 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2010920614 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2034343233 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2036885831 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2037719230 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2039635334 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2040827572 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2041426735 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2041648638 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2042133030 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2045922682 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2064909871 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2068415541 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2069647194 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2072340516 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2078886159 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2089828603 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2099164611 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2099574426 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2106881547 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2109231726 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2122008345 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2128604110 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2128863839 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2136017703 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2161216389 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2163409996 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2168542932 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2169667652 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2176020334 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2251383686 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2504124483 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2593170678 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2783786043 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2789659884 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2907381080 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W2999450705 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W3122686492 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W4242656577 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W4251796350 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W603675326 @default.
• W4319294581 cites W949994527 @default.
• W4319294581 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12854" @default.
• W4319294581 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36740971" @default.
• W4319294581 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4319294581 type Work @default.
• W4319294581 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4319294581 countsByYear W43192945812023 @default.
• W4319294581 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4319294581 hasAuthorship W4319294581A5013744952 @default.
• W4319294581 hasAuthorship W4319294581A5076638084 @default.
• W4319294581 hasBestOaLocation W43192945811 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConcept C148934300 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConcept C26022165 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConcept C2778073708 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConcept C2778121359 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConcept C4768521 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConcept C95975521 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConceptScore W4319294581C138496976 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConceptScore W4319294581C138885662 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConceptScore W4319294581C148934300 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConceptScore W4319294581C15744967 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConceptScore W4319294581C161191863 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConceptScore W4319294581C26022165 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConceptScore W4319294581C2777855551 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConceptScore W4319294581C2778073708 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConceptScore W4319294581C2778121359 @default.
• W4319294581 hasConceptScore W4319294581C41008148 @default.

• next