FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4320482262> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4320482262 abstract "Recent studies put under scrutiny the prevailing hand hygiene guidelines, which incorporate quantitative parameters regarding handrub volume and hand size. Understanding the criticality of complete (i.e., efficient) hand hygiene in healthcare, objectivization of hand hygiene related parameters are paramount, including the formulation of the ABHR. Complete coverage can be achieved with optimal Alcohol-Based Hand Rub (ABHR) provided. The literature is limited regarding ABHR formulation variances to antimicrobial efficiency and healthcare workers' preference, while public data on clinically relevant typical application differences is not available. This study was designed and performed to compare gel and liquid format ABHRs (the two most popular types in Europe) by measuring several parameters, including application time, spillage and coverage.Senior medical students were invited, and randomly assigned to receive pre-determined ABHR volumes (1.5 or 3 ml). All the 340 participants were given equal amounts of gel and liquid on two separate hand hygiene occasions, which occurred two weeks apart. During the hand hygiene events, by employing a digital, fully automated system paired with fluorescent-traced ABHRs, disinfectant hand coverage was objectively investigated. Furthermore, hand coverage in relation to the participants' hand sizes was also calculated. Additional data collection was performed regarding volume differences and their effect on application time, participants' volume awareness (consciousness) and disinfectant spillage during the hand hygiene events.The 1.5 ml ABHR volume (commonly applied in healthcare settings) is insufficient in either formulation, as the non-covered areas exceeded significant (5%+) of the total hand surface area. 3 ml, on the contrary, resulted in almost complete coverage (uncovered areas remained below 1.5%). Participants typically underestimated the volume which they needed to apply. While the liquid ABHR spreads better in the lower, 1.5 ml volume compared to the gel, the latter was easier handled at larger volume. Drying times were 30/32 s (gel and liquid formats, respectively) when 1.5 ml handrub was applied, and 40/42 s when 3 ml was used. As the evaporation rates of the ABHR used in the study are similar to those available on the market, one can presume that the results presented in the study apply for most WHO conform ABHRs.The results show that applying 1.5 ml volume was insufficient, as large part of the hand surface remained uncovered (7.0 ± 0.7% and 5.8 ± 1.0% of the hand surface in the case of gel and liquid, respectively) When 3 ml handrub was applied drying times were 40 and 42 s (gel and liquid, respectively), which is a very long time in daily clinical practice. It looks like we cannot find a volume that fits for everyone. Personalized, hand size based ABHR volumes may be the solution to find an optimal balance between maximize coverage and minimise spillage and drying time. 3 ml can be a good volume for those who have medium size hands. Large handed people should use more handrub to reach appropriate coverage, while small-handed ones may apply less to avoid massive spillage and not to take unrealistically long to dry." @default.
• W4320482262 created "2023-02-14" @default.
• W4320482262 creator A5026416793 @default.
• W4320482262 creator A5032816692 @default.
• W4320482262 creator A5040563296 @default.
• W4320482262 creator A5054736271 @default.
• W4320482262 creator A5063721274 @default.
• W4320482262 creator A5068708902 @default.
• W4320482262 creator A5088288432 @default.
• W4320482262 date "2023-02-13" @default.
• W4320482262 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4320482262 title "Evidence-based hand hygiene: Liquid or gel handrub, does it matter?" @default.
• W4320482262 cites W1674051885 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W1990698742 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2008314679 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2019755840 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2035942085 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2073047139 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2089166015 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2095328251 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2109874733 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2167764138 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2344824090 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2399199786 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2594011881 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2621169459 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2736297591 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2765087833 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2766256706 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2807368989 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2891633589 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2991455812 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W2998753706 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W3005057892 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W3006266596 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W3035083109 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W3121087436 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W3133957014 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W3169061343 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W4214770273 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W4285546826 @default.
• W4320482262 cites W4286716319 @default.
• W4320482262 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-023-01212-4" @default.
• W4320482262 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36782305" @default.
• W4320482262 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4320482262 type Work @default.
• W4320482262 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4320482262 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4320482262 hasAuthorship W4320482262A5026416793 @default.
• W4320482262 hasAuthorship W4320482262A5032816692 @default.
• W4320482262 hasAuthorship W4320482262A5040563296 @default.
• W4320482262 hasAuthorship W4320482262A5054736271 @default.
• W4320482262 hasAuthorship W4320482262A5063721274 @default.
• W4320482262 hasAuthorship W4320482262A5068708902 @default.
• W4320482262 hasAuthorship W4320482262A5088288432 @default.
• W4320482262 hasBestOaLocation W43204822621 @default.
• W4320482262 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4320482262 hasConcept C2781221799 @default.
• W4320482262 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W4320482262 hasConcept C547646559 @default.
• W4320482262 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4320482262 hasConceptScore W4320482262C142724271 @default.
• W4320482262 hasConceptScore W4320482262C2781221799 @default.
• W4320482262 hasConceptScore W4320482262C545542383 @default.
• W4320482262 hasConceptScore W4320482262C547646559 @default.
• W4320482262 hasConceptScore W4320482262C71924100 @default.
• W4320482262 hasFunder F4320321102 @default.
• W4320482262 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4320482262 hasLocation W43204822621 @default.
• W4320482262 hasLocation W43204822622 @default.
• W4320482262 hasLocation W43204822623 @default.
• W4320482262 hasLocation W43204822624 @default.
• W4320482262 hasOpenAccess W4320482262 @default.
• W4320482262 hasPrimaryLocation W43204822621 @default.
• W4320482262 hasRelatedWork W1999391079 @default.
• W4320482262 hasRelatedWork W2088165079 @default.
• W4320482262 hasRelatedWork W2089166015 @default.
• W4320482262 hasRelatedWork W2105179136 @default.
• W4320482262 hasRelatedWork W2352205424 @default.
• W4320482262 hasRelatedWork W2352449532 @default.
• W4320482262 hasRelatedWork W2357808604 @default.
• W4320482262 hasRelatedWork W2414486522 @default.
• W4320482262 hasRelatedWork W3213019720 @default.
• W4320482262 hasRelatedWork W4200529713 @default.
• W4320482262 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W4320482262 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4320482262 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4320482262 workType "article" @default.