FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4320921423> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4320921423 endingPage "465" @default.
• W4320921423 startingPage "453" @default.
• W4320921423 abstract "Study objective To review closed reduction methods for anterior shoulder dislocation and perform the first comprehensive comparison of the individual methods in terms of success rate, pain, and reduction time. Methods We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials registered until December 31, 2020. We performed a pairwise and network meta-analysis using a Bayesian random-effects model. Two authors independently performed screening and risk-of-bias assessment. Results We found 14 studies with 1,189 patients. In a pairwise meta-analysis, no significant difference was found in the only comparable pair, namely, the Kocher method versus the Hippocratic method (success rate: odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53, 2.75: pain during reduction [visual analog scale]: standard mean difference, −0.33; 95% CI, −0.69, 0.02; reduction time [minutes]: mean difference, 0.19, 95% CI, −1.77, 2.15). In network meta-analysis, FARES (Fast, Reliable, and Safe) was the only method significantly less painful than the Kocher method (mean difference, −4.0; 95% credible interval, −7.6, −0.40). In the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) plot of success rate, FARES, and the Boss–Holzach–Matter/Davos method showed high values. For pain during reduction, FARES had the highest SUCRA value in the overall analysis. In the SUCRA plot of reduction time, modified external rotation and FARES had high values. The only complication was 1 case of fracture with the Kocher method. Conclusion Overall, Boss–Holzach–Matter/Davos, and FARES demonstrated the most favorable value for success rates, whereas both FARES and modified external rotation were more favorable in reduction times. FARES had the most favorable SUCRA for pain during reduction. Future work directly comparing techniques is needed to better understand the difference in reduction success and complications. To review closed reduction methods for anterior shoulder dislocation and perform the first comprehensive comparison of the individual methods in terms of success rate, pain, and reduction time. We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials registered until December 31, 2020. We performed a pairwise and network meta-analysis using a Bayesian random-effects model. Two authors independently performed screening and risk-of-bias assessment. We found 14 studies with 1,189 patients. In a pairwise meta-analysis, no significant difference was found in the only comparable pair, namely, the Kocher method versus the Hippocratic method (success rate: odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53, 2.75: pain during reduction [visual analog scale]: standard mean difference, −0.33; 95% CI, −0.69, 0.02; reduction time [minutes]: mean difference, 0.19, 95% CI, −1.77, 2.15). In network meta-analysis, FARES (Fast, Reliable, and Safe) was the only method significantly less painful than the Kocher method (mean difference, −4.0; 95% credible interval, −7.6, −0.40). In the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) plot of success rate, FARES, and the Boss–Holzach–Matter/Davos method showed high values. For pain during reduction, FARES had the highest SUCRA value in the overall analysis. In the SUCRA plot of reduction time, modified external rotation and FARES had high values. The only complication was 1 case of fracture with the Kocher method. Overall, Boss–Holzach–Matter/Davos, and FARES demonstrated the most favorable value for success rates, whereas both FARES and modified external rotation were more favorable in reduction times. FARES had the most favorable SUCRA for pain during reduction. Future work directly comparing techniques is needed to better understand the difference in reduction success and complications." @default.
• W4320921423 created "2023-02-16" @default.
• W4320921423 creator A5009676826 @default.
• W4320921423 creator A5013256855 @default.
• W4320921423 creator A5032865932 @default.
• W4320921423 creator A5043705434 @default.
• W4320921423 date "2023-04-01" @default.
• W4320921423 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W4320921423 title "A Systematic Review With Pairwise and Network Meta-analysis of Closed Reduction Methods for Anterior Shoulder Dislocation" @default.
• W4320921423 cites W1520521531 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W1967396648 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W1998053764 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2010699829 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2013935021 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2015129402 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2038240793 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2055183732 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2057765075 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2059916076 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2063009088 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2075768915 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2076219225 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2087759516 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2091808438 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2096390829 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2143528735 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2151769848 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2204029868 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2271420473 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2591842381 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2792641371 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2954183797 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2970684805 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W2999470993 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W3022903699 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W3040470215 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W3092493677 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W4243747196 @default.
• W4320921423 cites W1897198048 @default.
• W4320921423 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.10.020" @default.
• W4320921423 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36797133" @default.
• W4320921423 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4320921423 type Work @default.
• W4320921423 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4320921423 countsByYear W43209214232023 @default.
• W4320921423 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4320921423 hasAuthorship W4320921423A5009676826 @default.
• W4320921423 hasAuthorship W4320921423A5013256855 @default.
• W4320921423 hasAuthorship W4320921423A5032865932 @default.
• W4320921423 hasAuthorship W4320921423A5043705434 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConcept C194661718 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConceptScore W4320921423C126322002 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConceptScore W4320921423C141071460 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConceptScore W4320921423C156957248 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConceptScore W4320921423C168563851 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConceptScore W4320921423C17744445 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConceptScore W4320921423C194661718 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConceptScore W4320921423C199539241 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConceptScore W4320921423C2779473830 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConceptScore W4320921423C44249647 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConceptScore W4320921423C71924100 @default.
• W4320921423 hasConceptScore W4320921423C95190672 @default.
• W4320921423 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W4320921423 hasLocation W43209214231 @default.
• W4320921423 hasLocation W43209214232 @default.
• W4320921423 hasOpenAccess W4320921423 @default.
• W4320921423 hasPrimaryLocation W43209214231 @default.
• W4320921423 hasRelatedWork W2027893081 @default.
• W4320921423 hasRelatedWork W2047252483 @default.
• W4320921423 hasRelatedWork W2074274808 @default.
• W4320921423 hasRelatedWork W2286371484 @default.
• W4320921423 hasRelatedWork W2318119155 @default.
• W4320921423 hasRelatedWork W2531052508 @default.
• W4320921423 hasRelatedWork W2747332931 @default.
• W4320921423 hasRelatedWork W2943907239 @default.
• W4320921423 hasRelatedWork W2976179431 @default.
• W4320921423 hasRelatedWork W4291824836 @default.
• W4320921423 hasVolume "81" @default.
• W4320921423 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4320921423 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4320921423 workType "article" @default.