Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4321429287> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4321429287 endingPage "20" @default.
- W4321429287 startingPage "3" @default.
- W4321429287 abstract "There are great differences in heat sensitivity between different cell types and tissues. However, for an isoeffect induced in a specific cell type or tissue by heating for different durations at different temperatures varying from 43–44°C up to about 57°C, the duration of heating must be increased by a factor of about 2 (R value) when the temperature is decreased by 1°C. This same time–temperature relationship has been observed for heat inactivation of proteins, and changing only one amino acid out of 253 can shift the temperature for a given amount of protein denaturation from 46°C to either 43 or 49°C. For cytotoxic temperatures <43–44°C, R for mammalian cells and tissues is about 4–6. Many factors change the absolute heat sensitivity of mammalian cells by about 1°C, but these factors have little effect on Rs, although the transition in R at 43–44°C may be eliminated or shifted by about 1°C. R for heat radiosensitization are similar to those above for heat cytotoxicity, but Rs for heat chemosensitization are much smaller (usually about 1.1–1.2). In practically all of the clinical trials that have been conducted, heat and radiation have been separated by 30–60 min, for which the primary effect should be heat cytotoxicity and not heat radiosensitization. Data are presented showing the clinical application of the thermal isoeffect dose (TID) concept in which different heating protocols for different times at different temperatures are converted into equivalent minutes (equiv) min at 43°C (EM43). For several heat treatments in the clinic, the TIDs for each treatment can be added to give a cumulative equiv min at 43°C, namely, CEM43. This TID concept was applied by Oleson et al. in a retrospective analysis of clinical data, with the intent of using this approach prospectively to guide future clinical studies. Considerations of laboratory data and the large variations in temperature distributions observed in human tumors indicate that thermal tolerance, which has been observed for mammalian cells for both heat killing and heat radiosensitization, probably is not very important in the clinic. However, if thermal tolerance did occur in the clinical trials in which fractionation schemes were varied, it probably would not have been detected because with only the two–three-fold change in treatment time that occurs when comparing one versus two fractions per week, or three versus six total fractions, little difference would be expected in the response of the tumors since both thermal doses were extremely low on the dose-response curve. Data are shown which indicate that in order to test for thermal tolerance in the clinic and to have a successful phase III trial, the thermal dose should be increased about five-fold compared with what has been achieved in previous clinical trials. This increase in thermal dose could be achieved by increasing the temperature about 1.5°C (from 39.5 to 41.0°C in 90% of the tumor) or by increasing the total treatment time about five-fold. The estimate is that 90% of the tumor should receive a cumulative thermal dose (CEM43) of at least 25; this is abbreviated as a CEM43 T90 of 25. This value of 25 compares with 5 observed by Oleson et al. in their soft tissue sarcoma study. Arguments also are presented that thermal doses much higher than the CEM43 T90 induce the hyperthermic damage that causes the tumors to respond, and that the minimum CEM43 T90 of 25 only predicts which tumors that receive a certain minimal thermal dose in <90% of the regions of the tumors will respond. For example, in addition to a minimal CEM43 T90 of 25 a minimum CEM43 T50 of about 400 also may be required for a response. Finally, continuous heating for ∼2 days at about 41°C during either interstitial low dose-rate irradiation or fractionated high dose-rate irradiation, which we estimate could give a CEM43 of 75, should be considered in order to enhance heat radiosensitization of the tumor as well as heat cytotoxicity. In order to exploit the use of hyperthermia in the clinic, we need a better understanding of the biology and physiology of heat effects in tumors and various normal tissues. As an example of an approach for mechanistic studies, one specific study is described which demonstrates that damage to the centrosome of CHO cells heated during G1 causes irregular divisions that result in multinucleated cells that do not continue dividing to form colonies. This may or may not be relevant for heat damage in vivo. However, since normal tissues vary in thermal sensitivity by a factor of 10, similar approaches are needed to describe the fundamental lethal events that occur in the cells comprising the different tissues." @default.
- W4321429287 created "2023-02-22" @default.
- W4321429287 creator A5045098217 @default.
- W4321429287 date "2009-01-01" @default.
- W4321429287 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
- W4321429287 title "Arrhenius relationships from the molecule and cell to the clinic" @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1963674141 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1969082524 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1969502142 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1977564401 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1978338221 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1979924625 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1981889038 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1982664132 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1986476033 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1987812467 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1991565616 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1993082783 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1994921722 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1995435018 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1996710583 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1997401797 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W1997532555 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2000144812 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2002289078 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2002910462 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2002949130 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2011835180 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2018435418 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2020942783 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2024422046 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2025083544 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2027544808 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2034535203 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2039666639 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2041654611 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2043402257 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2043619586 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2046797616 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2056954807 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2061781513 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2063215574 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2064779120 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2070705753 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2071889003 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2076046480 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2079152919 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2081348514 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2084130306 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2096319741 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2098668699 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2099280836 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2100012915 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2103417102 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2103751856 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2119167835 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2128729627 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2138767106 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2145147037 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2157725469 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2161382930 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2201497578 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2317509384 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2328523909 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2330919639 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2331384915 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2334021884 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W2764404159 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W4250863071 @default.
- W4321429287 cites W4300018445 @default.
- W4321429287 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/02656730902747919" @default.
- W4321429287 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W4321429287 type Work @default.
- W4321429287 citedByCount "140" @default.
- W4321429287 countsByYear W43214292872012 @default.
- W4321429287 countsByYear W43214292872013 @default.
- W4321429287 countsByYear W43214292872014 @default.
- W4321429287 countsByYear W43214292872015 @default.
- W4321429287 countsByYear W43214292872016 @default.
- W4321429287 countsByYear W43214292872017 @default.
- W4321429287 countsByYear W43214292872018 @default.
- W4321429287 countsByYear W43214292872019 @default.
- W4321429287 countsByYear W43214292872020 @default.
- W4321429287 countsByYear W43214292872021 @default.
- W4321429287 countsByYear W43214292872022 @default.
- W4321429287 countsByYear W43214292872023 @default.
- W4321429287 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4321429287 hasAuthorship W4321429287A5045098217 @default.
- W4321429287 hasConcept C109316439 @default.
- W4321429287 hasConcept C12554922 @default.
- W4321429287 hasConcept C13965031 @default.
- W4321429287 hasConcept C153911025 @default.
- W4321429287 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
- W4321429287 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W4321429287 hasConcept C202751555 @default.
- W4321429287 hasConcept C2776923230 @default.
- W4321429287 hasConcept C32909587 @default.
- W4321429287 hasConcept C55493867 @default.