FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4321503208> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4321503208 endingPage "1713" @default.
• W4321503208 startingPage "1702" @default.
• W4321503208 abstract "Purpose To systematically review and report the mid- to long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after hip labral reconstruction. Methods A literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for clinical studies reporting mid- to long-term PROs at minimum 5-year follow-up after arthroscopic hip labral reconstruction. A quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index of Non-Randomized Studies grading system. Data collection included study characteristics, demographics, indications, radiographic metrics, perioperative findings, surgical technique, baseline and most recent PROs, and subsequent surgeries. Results Four studies met inclusion criteria, with 182 hips (age range, 27.9-38.7 years) undergoing labral reconstruction in primary and revision hip surgery with minimum 5-year follow-up. There were three Level III studies and one Level IV study, with an average Methodological Index of Non-Randomized Studies score of 16.6. All studies cited labral tissue characteristics as a factor for surgical indications, including the quality and/or size of the labrum. Three studies performed segmental labral reconstructions, whereas another study used a circumferential technique. Varying grafts were selected, including hamstring autograft/allograft, ligamentum teres autograft, iliotibial band autograft, and tensor fascia lata autograft. All studies demonstrated improved PROs from baseline to most recent follow-up, with 4 studies reporting modified Harris Hip Score values that increased from baseline (range, 58.9-66.8) to most recent follow-up (range, 80.1-86.3). After labral reconstruction, rates of revision arthroscopy ranged from 4.8% to 13.3% and conversion to total hip arthroplasty ranged from 1.6% to 27%. Conclusions Improved PROs were observed in all studies at minimum 5-year follow-up, suggesting that labral reconstruction can offer durable results beyond short-term follow-up. Although surgical indications for all studies included labral tissue characteristics, differing graft selection and surgical techniques were used across studies, limiting the ability to determine an optimal treatment approach. Level of Evidence Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies. To systematically review and report the mid- to long-term patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after hip labral reconstruction. A literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for clinical studies reporting mid- to long-term PROs at minimum 5-year follow-up after arthroscopic hip labral reconstruction. A quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index of Non-Randomized Studies grading system. Data collection included study characteristics, demographics, indications, radiographic metrics, perioperative findings, surgical technique, baseline and most recent PROs, and subsequent surgeries. Four studies met inclusion criteria, with 182 hips (age range, 27.9-38.7 years) undergoing labral reconstruction in primary and revision hip surgery with minimum 5-year follow-up. There were three Level III studies and one Level IV study, with an average Methodological Index of Non-Randomized Studies score of 16.6. All studies cited labral tissue characteristics as a factor for surgical indications, including the quality and/or size of the labrum. Three studies performed segmental labral reconstructions, whereas another study used a circumferential technique. Varying grafts were selected, including hamstring autograft/allograft, ligamentum teres autograft, iliotibial band autograft, and tensor fascia lata autograft. All studies demonstrated improved PROs from baseline to most recent follow-up, with 4 studies reporting modified Harris Hip Score values that increased from baseline (range, 58.9-66.8) to most recent follow-up (range, 80.1-86.3). After labral reconstruction, rates of revision arthroscopy ranged from 4.8% to 13.3% and conversion to total hip arthroplasty ranged from 1.6% to 27%. Improved PROs were observed in all studies at minimum 5-year follow-up, suggesting that labral reconstruction can offer durable results beyond short-term follow-up. Although surgical indications for all studies included labral tissue characteristics, differing graft selection and surgical techniques were used across studies, limiting the ability to determine an optimal treatment approach." @default.
• W4321503208 created "2023-02-23" @default.
• W4321503208 creator A5007019218 @default.
• W4321503208 creator A5010096831 @default.
• W4321503208 creator A5010494526 @default.
• W4321503208 creator A5042869209 @default.
• W4321503208 creator A5044269061 @default.
• W4321503208 creator A5048410340 @default.
• W4321503208 date "2023-07-01" @default.
• W4321503208 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4321503208 title "Durable Outcomes After Hip Labral Reconstruction at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up: A Systematic Review" @default.
• W4321503208 cites W1951690907 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W1968712577 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W2017044005 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W2058279796 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W2077837028 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W2259816546 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W2265452680 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W2416633803 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W2587014056 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W2919085119 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W2960586704 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W2981466046 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W3000482891 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W3008850497 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W3043481709 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W3047684598 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W3047740623 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W3084679922 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W3093443581 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W3094116974 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W3100822254 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W3155044790 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W3194292390 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W3198679229 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W3204778610 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W3209912072 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W4221135666 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W4224222555 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W4225137739 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W4285802780 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W4321503208 cites W4308313660 @default.
• W4321503208 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2023.02.015" @default.
• W4321503208 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36828155" @default.
• W4321503208 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4321503208 type Work @default.
• W4321503208 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4321503208 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4321503208 hasAuthorship W4321503208A5007019218 @default.
• W4321503208 hasAuthorship W4321503208A5010096831 @default.
• W4321503208 hasAuthorship W4321503208A5010494526 @default.
• W4321503208 hasAuthorship W4321503208A5042869209 @default.
• W4321503208 hasAuthorship W4321503208A5044269061 @default.
• W4321503208 hasAuthorship W4321503208A5048410340 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConcept C2775889985 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConcept C2776141760 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConcept C2779961238 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConcept C2780485590 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConcept C2780886866 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConceptScore W4321503208C126322002 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConceptScore W4321503208C141071460 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConceptScore W4321503208C168563851 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConceptScore W4321503208C2775889985 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConceptScore W4321503208C2776141760 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConceptScore W4321503208C2776478404 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConceptScore W4321503208C2779162959 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConceptScore W4321503208C2779961238 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConceptScore W4321503208C2780485590 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConceptScore W4321503208C2780886866 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConceptScore W4321503208C31174226 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConceptScore W4321503208C71924100 @default.
• W4321503208 hasConceptScore W4321503208C95190672 @default.
• W4321503208 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W4321503208 hasLocation W43215032081 @default.
• W4321503208 hasLocation W43215032082 @default.
• W4321503208 hasOpenAccess W4321503208 @default.
• W4321503208 hasPrimaryLocation W43215032081 @default.
• W4321503208 hasRelatedWork W2039600609 @default.
• W4321503208 hasRelatedWork W2068199595 @default.
• W4321503208 hasRelatedWork W2800189188 @default.
• W4321503208 hasRelatedWork W2898506631 @default.
• W4321503208 hasRelatedWork W2982654518 @default.
• W4321503208 hasRelatedWork W2995504075 @default.
• W4321503208 hasRelatedWork W4226254122 @default.
• W4321503208 hasRelatedWork W4285188122 @default.
• W4321503208 hasRelatedWork W2189173910 @default.
• W4321503208 hasRelatedWork W4221165344 @default.
• W4321503208 hasVolume "39" @default.
• W4321503208 isParatext "false" @default.

• next