FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4322006844> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4322006844 abstract "Subduction of an oceanic plate beneath either an oceanic, or a continental, overriding plate requires two main conditions to occur in a steady state: i) a high enough subduction rate (~5 cm/yr, Schellart in print); and ii) a weak (efficiently softened/lubricated) subduction channel (Gerya and Meilick, 2011). The first requirement prevents thermal diffusive re-equilibrium of the subducting slab within the asthenospheric ambient mantle, maintaining the slab cold and dense enough to provide the slab-pull subduction driving force. The second condition, is achieved with the contribution of a strong dehydration of the serpentinized oceanic plate, with resulting pervasive fluid circulation in the subduction channel significantly promoting its weakening, thus preventing strong coupling between the subducting and the overriding plate. Avoiding such a coupling has been shown to be key to maintain stable subduction, since it generally leads to a halt in the subduction process and to slab break-off (Duarte et al., 2015). Both these conditions are seemingly not favoured in a continental subduction scenario, since continental lithosphere is positively buoyant and much less, or not al all, serpentinized. Hence, the (geo)dynamics governing continental subduction is still not fully understood.We thus carried out a set of geodynamic numerical modelling experiments to further understand the first order geodynamic constraints governing continental subduction in the specific scenario that considers the subduction of a continental plate beneath an oceanic one, i.e., upon the arrival of a continental plate at an intra-oceanic subduction zone. The 2D numerical experiments were conceived and constructed using the Underworld code (Moresi et al., 2007), to better understand the influence on continental subduction efficiency, as well as on related synthetic ophiolite obduction, of considering either a scenario of dominant trench retreat (roll-back) or trench advance (roll forward) subduction regime. Roll-back subduction was prescribed in our models by fixing the trailing edge of the overriding plate, whereas roll-forward subduction was favoured (allowed) by leaving it free to move. Our experiments ensure dynamic self consistency in all cases. &#160;Our preliminary results show that, although synthetic obduction is possible to achieve in both situations, the overall first order (geo)dynamic differences implied by the two different simulated regimes, bear important consequences on the timing, overall kinematic configuration and local stress/strain distribution of the considered continental subduction-exhumation cycle in each case.AcknowledgmentsThis work was funded by the Portuguese Funda&#231;&#227;o para a Ci&#234;ncia e a Tecnologia (FCT) I.P./MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC) &#8211; UIDB/50019/2020- IDLReferencesDuarte, J.C., Schellart, W.P., Cruden, A.R., 2015. How weak is the subduction zone interface? Geophysical Research Letters 42, 2664&#8211;2673. doi:10.1002/2014GL062876.Gerya, T.V., Meilick, F., 2011. Geodynamic regimes of subduction under an active margin: effects of rheological weakening by fluids and melts. Journal of Metamorphic Geology 29, 7&#8211;31. doi:0.1111/j.1525-1314.2010.00904.x.Moresi, L., Quenette, S., Lemiale, V., M&#233;riaux, C., Appelbe, B., Muhlhaus, H.B., 2007. Computational approaches to studying non-linear dynamics of the crust and mantle. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 163, 69&#8211;82. doi:10.1016/j.pepi.2007.06.009.Schellart, W.P., in print. Subduction zones: A short review, in Dynamics of Plate Tectonics and Mantle Convection, Editor: Jo&#227;o Duarte, ISBN: 9780323857338." @default.
• W4322006844 created "2023-02-26" @default.
• W4322006844 creator A5016906745 @default.
• W4322006844 creator A5018307892 @default.
• W4322006844 creator A5052214921 @default.
• W4322006844 creator A5061436467 @default.
• W4322006844 creator A5061597577 @default.
• W4322006844 creator A5084295931 @default.
• W4322006844 date "2023-05-15" @default.
• W4322006844 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W4322006844 title "Geodynamic modelling of continental subduction beneath oceanic lithosphere" @default.
• W4322006844 doi "https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu23-7248" @default.
• W4322006844 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4322006844 type Work @default.
• W4322006844 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4322006844 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4322006844 hasAuthorship W4322006844A5016906745 @default.
• W4322006844 hasAuthorship W4322006844A5018307892 @default.
• W4322006844 hasAuthorship W4322006844A5052214921 @default.
• W4322006844 hasAuthorship W4322006844A5061436467 @default.
• W4322006844 hasAuthorship W4322006844A5061597577 @default.
• W4322006844 hasAuthorship W4322006844A5084295931 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConcept C113740112 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConcept C119477230 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConcept C141646446 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConcept C154200439 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConcept C164485859 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConcept C165205528 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConcept C16942324 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConcept C58097730 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConcept C64174561 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConcept C67236022 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConcept C77928131 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConcept C8058405 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConcept C90523207 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConceptScore W4322006844C113740112 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConceptScore W4322006844C119477230 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConceptScore W4322006844C127313418 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConceptScore W4322006844C141646446 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConceptScore W4322006844C154200439 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConceptScore W4322006844C164485859 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConceptScore W4322006844C165205528 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConceptScore W4322006844C16942324 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConceptScore W4322006844C58097730 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConceptScore W4322006844C64174561 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConceptScore W4322006844C67236022 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConceptScore W4322006844C77928131 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConceptScore W4322006844C8058405 @default.
• W4322006844 hasConceptScore W4322006844C90523207 @default.
• W4322006844 hasLocation W43220068441 @default.
• W4322006844 hasOpenAccess W4322006844 @default.
• W4322006844 hasPrimaryLocation W43220068441 @default.
• W4322006844 hasRelatedWork W1559859869 @default.
• W4322006844 hasRelatedWork W2071476701 @default.
• W4322006844 hasRelatedWork W2113134174 @default.
• W4322006844 hasRelatedWork W2166861495 @default.
• W4322006844 hasRelatedWork W2388717413 @default.
• W4322006844 hasRelatedWork W2914659861 @default.
• W4322006844 hasRelatedWork W4220797976 @default.
• W4322006844 hasRelatedWork W4281285752 @default.
• W4322006844 hasRelatedWork W4322210718 @default.
• W4322006844 hasRelatedWork W57076637 @default.
• W4322006844 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4322006844 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4322006844 workType "article" @default.